Categories
Saved Web Pages

Ex-FBI who probed Trump-Russia links has ties to Moscow: Report

62448749-0-image-a-42_1663258550725.jpg

Published: 17:32 BST, 15 September 2022 | Updated: 18:03 BST, 15 September 2022

A senior FBI official who investigated Donald Trump‘s alleged links to Russia is now under the microscope for his own Moscow ties, a bombshell new report revealed on Thursday.

Charles McGonigal is the former counterintelligence chief at the FBI’s New York City field office.

He has not been charged with any crimes, Insider reports. 

But if McGonigal’s work with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska proves to have violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, he could face up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine at most.

Deripaska, a close ally of Vladimir Putin’s, was also a close contact of Trump 2016 campaign chair Paul Manafort and is thought to have played a leading role in the Kremlin’s efforts to interfere in that presidential race.

He and business tied to him were sanctioned by the Treasury Department for ‘malign activity’ and ‘attempting to subvert western democracies, and malicious cyber-activities.’

McGonigal’s links to Deripaska are reportedly at the heart of a grand jury subpoena that was issued in secret in November 2021.

It’s not clear if the investigation is still ongoing.

But the explosive Thursday report suggests McGonigal has had multiple contacts with an aide to Deripaska, including a referral to a law firm that ended up being a lucrative deal for a former Soviet official.

Charles McGonigal has been Special Agent in Charge of the Counterintelligence Division for the New York Field Office of the FBI since he was appointed to that position by James Comey in October 2016

That former official is Sergey Shestakov, who now lives in the US but is said to be the ex-chief of staff to the Soviet Union’s ambassador.

Shestakov reportedly disclosed in a filing that McGonigal was key to helping him ‘facilitate’ a meeting between Deripaska’s aide and a shady consulting company called Spectrum Risk Solutions.

McGonigal also introduced the Kremlin-linked billionaire’s assistant to a New York law firm that’s known for helping clients accused of ‘fraud and misconduct’ called Kobre & Kim.

It’s not clear what role Shestakov played in the referral but he claimed to have received $33,000 for it.

It’s also not clear if McGonigal’s work with Deripaska breaks any laws, though longtime intelligence community journalist Tim Weiner told Insider, ‘If McGonigal is mixed up in any way shape or form with Deripaska, that strikes me as unseemly, to put it politely.’

McGonigal had a hand in the early stages of the Trump-Russia investigation that became Crossfire Hurricane 

McGonigal is reportedly linked to Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, who is a close ally of Vladimir Putin (pictured)

McGonigal didn’t respond to Insider’s request for comment, while Kobre & Kim refused to provide a statement.

A senior FBI official suggested to the outlet that McGonigal’s probing by a grand jury is in itself extraordinary.

‘It’s very rare that former FBI people at all, and certainly former senior FBI people, wind up as grand-jury targets,’ they said.

McGonigal’s lengthy FBI resumé includes investigating Wikileaks and Chelsea Manning, as well as probing a Bill Clinton advisor for improper handling of classified National Archives records.

He was reportedly one of the first federal law enforcement officers to find out that a Trump 2016 campaign staffer bragged about Russians having damaging information on Hillary Clinton, which sparked the infamous Trump-Russia probe known as Crossfire Hurricane.

At the time, McGonigal headed the cybercrimes division at the FBI’s Washington HQ. 

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Charles McGonigal

McGonigal joined the FBI in 1996. His first assignment was New York City, where he worked Russian foreign counterintelligence and organized crime matters. During his tenure in New York, McGonigal worked on the TWA Flight 800 investigation, was assigned to the task force investigating Wen Ho Lee, investigated the 1998 terrorist bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, and investigated the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. Interesting/controversial list of investigations.

He was also assigned to Cleveland, Washington field office, HQs, and Baltimore. He was moved to FBI HQ to stand up a Cyber-Counterintelligence Coordination Section working in Bill Priesap’s area who headed the Counterintelligence area at HQ. McGonigal worked Counterintelligence and Cyber threats, specifically working and managing Espionage, Economic Espionage and Insider Threat investigations. In other words, McGonigal would have understood exactly what happened to the DNC server. When DNC claimed Russia had hacked the email system of the Democratic National Committee, McGonigal was serving as chief of the cybercrimes section at FBI headquarters in Washington. As a cyber expert he would have known a hack could not have extracted the data at the rate at which it was downloaded.

Interestingly, in 2010, McGonigal was in charge of the WikiLeaks Task Force at HQ FBI, the task force  identified Pfc. Bradley Manning as the leaker. Manning was later convicted for espionage related violations and pardoned by Obama. If you’re following along, McGonigal can find Manning but not the breach in the DNC? Or the foreign interference in the 2020 election?

By Jun 2016 he was transferred to the NYC field office and appears in a video forum: Foreign Influence Ops and Counterintelligence.

McGonigal, along with William Evanina (who is a career FBI and CIA guy (ODNI worked for Coates, NCSC)). McGonigal leads off the forum with the announcement that Director Comey had just been fired by Trump. He refers to Comey as “most loved leader” of FBI. He goes on to discuss how he works with foreign governments all over the globe. He says there are 150 agents focused on counter intelligence. One interesting comment was him saying resources are allocated based on threat. While that may sound benign to non government folks, inside the government it is well known that the threat is often embellished to increase the amount of resources available. The threat of white supremacy is a good example. He defines espionage as access to classified and sharing it w/o authority. He goes on to say that the FBI has sole jurisdiction in these matters.

William Evanina describes his duties as driving policy and interfacing with the White House and Congress; chairs NATO panel; 5 I’s panel chair once a month. He briefly talks about how often, early in his career, he heard about Russian propaganda; but that it had been driven home for him when they interfered in the 2016 election. “We know for a fact they did.” When someone asked if because Russia was involved in the 2016 election should we go back to paper voting, his response: there was quite a bit of spin in the media. He said emphatically that it was a fact “no voting machine was hacked during 2016 election.”

Evanina said there was an assessment of voting machines and that no voting machine hacked. He went further, stating even if someone wanted to hack a machine, the precincts were not connected to each other or the internet. He then makes the point that someone couldn’t get to all the machines; which we know makes little difference if you know what precincts makes the most impact. Then he falsely claims each state has different systems so no one could effectively hack them all.

McGonigal tells the audience “We don’t just run out and open investigations into someone without the appropriate predication.”  “We have all kinds of legal review processes” While this is technically correct, the real question is do they use the legal review processes? We know they do not use them every time; when they do use them they are not always truthful; and, in general, the fact that they have them means nothing.

With all of this as background material, we recently found out McGonigal was the subject of a grand jury. US attorneys secretly convened a grand jury that examined his conduct while assigned to the FBI field office in New York City (his last assignment). Specifically “McGonigal’s business dealings with a top aide to Oleg Deripaska, the billionaire Russian oligarch who was at the center of allegations that Russia colluded with the Trump campaign to interfere in the 2016 election.”

According to Business Insider “The subpoena, issued in November, requests records relating to McGonigal and a shadowy consulting firm called Spectrum Risk Solutions. A week after the subpoena was issued, a Soviet-born immigrant named Sergey Shestakov said in a separate filing that McGonigal had helped him “facilitate” an introduction between Spectrum and Deripaska’s aide. The filing also states that McGonigal helped introduce the aide to Kobre & Kim, a New York law firm that specializes in representing clients who are being investigated on suspicion of “fraud and misconduct.” Shestakov, who has been identified on TV panels as a former Soviet foreign ministry official and former chief of staff to the Soviet ambassador to the United Nations, reported receiving $33,000 for the referrals.”

McGonigal is not registered as a foreign agent. Therefore any work done on behalf of foreigners is a crime and punishable by the Foreign Agents Registration Act and carries a $250,000 fine and up to five years in prison. It just so happens Deripaska was found guilty by the Treasury Department in 2018 for acting as an agent for the Kremlin. The leaked grand jury document covers Apr 1, 2017 to present.

Business Insider states “According to the witness subpoena, prosecutors are also looking into whether McGonigal has ties to the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as any “payments or gifts” he was provided by the governments of Kosovo, Montenegro, and Albania.”

McGonigal has appeared at several forums, panels, and interviews to discuss counterintelligence. In 2020, after his alleged assistance to Deripaska’s aide, he appeared on a panel at the Atlantic Council, where he discussed the corruption of Russia’s security services. “You are seeing an erosion in any rule of law as it relates to the FSB,” he said. “It would be akin to having in the United States the FBI as a rogue element, operating at the behest of the highest bidder.” (You just can’t make this up)

“McGonigal’s profile on LinkedIn says he is the senior vice president of “global security and life safety” at Brookfield Properties, a multibillion-dollar real-estate company in New York. But that information, apparently, is inaccurate. “Charlie McGonigal is no longer with Brookfield,” Andrew Brent, Brookfield’s head of communications, told Insider. McGonigal left the company, he added, in early January — just as witnesses were scheduled to appear before the grand jury.”

During an interview with a Brazilian reporter in Jun 2018, Charles McGonigal tells the Brazilian reporter “Anything on line has inherent risk” when discussing electronic voting systems.” He goes on to say the “FBI doesn’t want to infringe on anyone’s rights”. He tells the reporter there are so many levels of scrutiny internal to the FBI, referring to individuals rights during investigations, that there is no way anyone’s rights are violated. He said the FBI is always mindful of the legal process.

(https://potomacofficersclub.com/speakers/charles-mcgonigal/)

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/charles-mcgonigal-named-special-agent-in-charge-of-the-counterintelligence-division-for-the-new-york-field-office

https://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-fbi-charles-mcgonigal-trump-russia-grand-jury-oleg-deripaska-2022-9

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Top FBI Agent Tied to Russia — and that’s not all

fb_default-92363a6f030fe6f8aa9f517166a1d

Share this article




Categories
Saved Web Pages

Report: US Senate asks to interview Israeli-Brit in connection with Russia probe

Screen-Shot-2018-08-01-at-8.27.03-PM-e15

CRM

Coronavirus latest

Israel statistics:

  • 6,718,317 Vaccinated: 1st dose
  • 4,666,165 cases
  • 6,154,311 Vaccinated: 2nd dose
  • 6,814 Active cases
  • 4,511,028 Vaccinated: 3rd dose
  • 77 Serious cases
  • 849,602 Vaccinated: 4th dose
  • 11,706 deaths
Global statistics:

  • 625,045,733 cases
  • 6,555,859 deaths
  • 604,876,979 recovered

Scroll to view more

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Walter Soriano: The covert operative for Russian and Israeli elite

soriano-featured-bw.png

In late 2013, Oleg Deripaska’s Basel Aero (part of his network of entities under the Basic Element parent company) was looking for ways to ensure that the Sochi airport would be kept safe during President Putin’s prized Olympic Games. In a previously unreported episode, the joint Deripaska-Sberbank LLC that controls the Sochi International Airport turned not to Russian security experts, but rather to a UK-Israeli man with ties to the Netanyahu government and who has recently come under scrutiny by the Senate Intelligence Committee – Walter Soriano.

A small-claims court dispute in Krasnador, Russia revealed the details about Soriano’s work for the Sochi Olympics. If it were not for this dispute – over 800,000 rubles or approximately $12,500 for an Israeli operating without a work permit – these details about Soriano’s work for Russia may have never seen the light of day.

Buried within details about the companies involved and Russian case law were four paragraphs about the work that Soriano’s USG Security Limited did for the Deripaska-Sberbank LLC. “The first stage: from 12/23/2013 to 02/02/2014,” the court wrote, citing a contract signed by the Russian LLC and Soriano’s USG Security, “a study of the existing situation, training of personnel of the aviation security service and airport security technology. Stage two from 02/03/2014 to 03/18/2014 direct control at the facility and consulting assistance during the preparation and holding of the Olympic Games.

Thus it appears, based on the contract cited in official Russian court filings, that Soriano’s USG Security had “direct control” of the Sochi International Airport during Putin’s crown jewel – the Olympic Games. The entire relevant section of the court filing is translated below:

[P]ersonnel training services were carried out under a consulting services agreement dated December 26, 2013, concluded by the company [Sochi International Airport] and USG Security Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the company).

From the content of the contract dated December 26, 2013 it follows that in accordance with clause 3.4 of the contract services will be provided in two stages. The first stage: from 12/23/2013 to 02/02/2014 – a study of the existing situation, training of personnel of the aviation security service and airport security technology. Stage two from 02/03/2014 to 03/18/2014 direct control at the facility and consulting assistance during the preparation and holding of the Olympic Games.

In clause 3.9 of the contract, the airport is required to provide the company with all the necessary data in written, oral and other form, to provide employees of the company with access to the premises and equipment, to receive for the company, its employees and representatives all necessary permits and other documentation (including visas, permits to work), provide them with housing and transportation.

Clause 12 of Appendix No. 2 to the contract dated December 26, 2013 stipulates that the airport should ensure the receipt of work permits and / or equivalent permits in order to create safe and legally stipulated work conditions for the USG work group.

Forensic News spoke with a number of Russia experts who expressed surprise that Soriano and USG Security were put in charge of such an important task for Russia.

This is a quite an unusual situation with a foreigner like Soriano in Sochi,” Ilya Zaslavskiy, head of Underminers.info, a research project on post-Soviet kleptocracy in the West, told Forensic News. “It suggests that Soriano and his firm possessed some knowledge and/or technology to survey other foreigners and/or Russians that the Russian state could not get otherwise.”

It also suggests very close links of Soriano with the Russian state and Deripaska as they don’t let random people in such sensitive spheres,” Zaslavskiy said.

Anders Aslund, a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and author of Russia’s Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy, told Forensic News that there was a massive payoff to those close to Putin surrounding the Sochi Olympics. He also suggested that Soriano may have had the Kremlin’s blessing, given the importance of the Olympics.

Opposition analysts Boris Nemtsov and Leonid Martyniuk found that $25 billion was overpaid to friends or cronies of President Vladimir Putin. Deripaska belongs to this circle. That someone is entitled to be a major security contractor in this circle suggests very close contacts to the Kremlin and Russian security services.

Nemtsov was assassinated in 2015, with Western leaders largely blaming Putin’s government. His body was found riddled with bullets just steps from the Kremlin. Five Chechens were convicted of his murder.

Mitchell Orenstein, Professor of Russian and East European Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, saw a potentially legitimate reason for Soriano’s USG Security being hired for Sochi: “On the one hand, it looks pretty straightforward.  Soriano has a security company.  He is hired to provide aviation security for the Sochi Olympics. Perhaps they wanted to hire a Western firm because they were likely to achieve the security goal without angering all the international clientele.

However Orenstein concluded with the same overarching opinion as Zaslavskiy and Aslund: Soriano must have a close relationship with Deripaska and the Russian state: “Of course, it is well known that the Sochi contracts all went to friends, who often asked for kickbacks. So, at the very least, it does show a business relationship of some closeness to Deripaska and Sberbank.”

A friend of Professor Orenstein’s who has worked in Russia and who spoke to Forensic News on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the topic, raised serious concerns about Soriano’s involvement in Sochi.

Generally speaking, airport security during the Olympics is an extremely sensitive issue, in particular, since Russia is always under the threat of terrorist attacks that grew exponentially before the games. So, it sounds like the Kremlin very much trusted USG Security.”

The person also expressed concerns about possible kickbacks, similar to the concerns of Aslund and Orenstein, to consultants during the Olympics, saying, “‘consulting’ is a standard way to hide kickbacks and other corrupt payments.”

Senate interest

In April 2019, as previously reported by Politico, the Senate Intelligence Committee sent a letter to Soriano’s USG Security office in London, requesting an interview and documents relating to any communications with various figures associated with their investigation. Now, for the first time, the entire list of persons/entities can be revealed. They are:

  • Oleg Deripaska
  • Victor Boyarkin
  • Georgy Oganov
  • Konstantin Kilimnik
  • Paul Manafort
  • Erik Prince
  • Darren Blanton
  • Michael Flynn
  • Steve Bannon
  • David Bossie
  • Psy Group aka Invop Ltd aka IOCO ltd (Joel Zamel + Royi Burstein)
  • Wikistrat
  • Black Cube
  • George Birnbaum
  • Aron Shaviv
  • Orbis Business Intelligence (Christoper Steele + Christopher Burrows)

A source familiar with the Senate Intelligence probe wouldn’t comment on most of those involved and/or how they might relate to Soriano, with the obvious exception of Oleg Deripaska. The Committee also did not comment when asked if Soriano had complied with the request.

With regards to George Birnbaum, the source said, the Committee is interested in a pair of Washington, DC companies incorporated in January 2016, weeks before Birnbaum pitched the Trump campaign on Psy Group.

The two companies, JRP LLC and Questia Opinions LLC, were dissolved in April 2017. Records show that the address listed for both entities, 228 S Washington St Ste 115, is shared with numerous PACs, including some headed by David Bossie, who was on the list sent by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

In an email to Forensic News, Birnbaum expressed surprise that he would be included in the Soriano inquiry: “to my recollection I have never met, corresponded or had any contact with anyone by that name in my life. I have no idea why my name would be included in the request.”

Rachel Cohen, a spokesman for the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that the Committee does not comment on witness engagements.

Other Russian clients

Soriano’s USG Security had other high-profile Russian clients apart from Deripaska. According to a sworn affidavit in Israeli court by journalist Raviv Drucker (whom Soriano is suing for libel), USG Security has also worked for Roman Abramovich and Dmitry Rybolovlev. This was first reported in English by Seth Hettena.

Drucker has a storied history of investigative journalism that has resulted in police investigations and awards, including a 2008 OMETZ award (Citizens for Good Governance and Social Justice) and a 2012 Transparency International award. Recently, Drucker’s reporting led to Israeli police opening an investigation into potential bribery of the Netanyahu family by an Australian billionaire.

Abramovich and his ex-wife Dasha Zhukova were once very close to Jared and Ivanka Kushner. Rybolovlev purchased a Florida mansion from Donald Trump in 2008 for $95,000,000, a sharp increase from the $40,000,000 Trump had spent on the property just three years prior. Rybolovlev never lived in the house.

From the Israeli journalist Drucker’s affidavit (translated):

USG’s clients were many and varied, including well-known capitalists, such as Mr. Roman Abramovich in his legal dispute against Mr. Boris Berezovsky…Dmitry Rybolovlev in the course of the legal dispute he waged against the art collector Yves Bouvier.

The Rybolovlev connection is further affirmed by a French journalist Marc LePlongeon who obtained correspondences between Soriano and Rybolovlev’s attorney Tetiana Bersheda (both were charged in 2018 in Monaco in a corruption probe).

According to documents obtained by LePlongeon, Rybolovlev hired Soriano in mid 2016 to investigate a former coach and player of his soccer club, AS Monaco. Soriano had a company called Football Universe Limited from 2008-2011, alongside footballer Claudio Canniga, who was one of the two other directors in the company. In 2010, Walter Soriano spoke on behalf of soccer star Diego Maradona. Maradona’s lawyer, Timothy Drukker, was the third director of the company.

As Drucker stated in court,

Some of the services offered by the USG were sometimes carried out using sub-contractors and through operations such as sophisticated tracking, data collection and data acquisition through various technological means, such as hacking, eavesdropping, and more.

The newly revealed Russian contacts and Senate Intelligence list for Soriano adds to a growing mystery about his connections with power brokers all around the world.

Forensic News is entirely reader-funded.

Donate today.

Ties to Netanyahu

Soriano’s ties to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu run deep and appear to only have been severed after Soriano was publicly named in 2017.

Israeli investigative journalist Ravi Drucker, in the course of his investigation, was able to obtain email correspondences between Soriano and Ari Harow, then Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Bureau Chief. In the messages, Harow and Soriano discuss the scheduling of an upcoming Soriano-Netanyahu meeting.

In 2017, Israeli authorities, who are investigating Netanyahu for various crimes, recommended indicting Harow for bribery, breach of trust, fraud and money laundering. Months later, Harow signed a plea deal with the authorities and turned on Netanyahu. Harow was subsequently convicted of only fraud and breach of trust.

After the police commissioner in Israel stated that private investigators collected information on the police forces investigating Netanyahu, Israeli media named Soriano as the culprit.

The reporting about Soriano in 2018 led to Netanyahu himself posting a Facebook status saying in part, “I haven’t met or talked to Soriano in eight years.

Soriano’s connections to Netanyahu don’t end with Harow. Isaac Molho, a close confidant of Netanyahu’s, had a share in Soriano’s aforementioned Universe Security Group, according to business documents.

Another document, first published by Drucker, shows that Molho received almost $200,000 in finder’s fees for a contract Molho facilitated with the Mexican company Altos Hornos de Mexico (AHMSA). AHMSA is the largest integrated steel plant in Mexico. It is unclear what kind of work Universe Security Group did for the company.

Molho himself was wrapped up in the Netanyahu corruption scandal and was interviewed by police five times, but has thus far escaped charges. Molho has represented Netanyahu since 1996 in various political, legal, and personal matters.

Molho is married to Netanyahu’s cousin, and according to a Haaretz profile his “tendency to be discreet and avoid the press is said to be one of the qualities the prime minister appreciates most in him.”

In explosive testimony in July 2019, a former subcontractor of Soriano’s who was hired to provide security at the AHMSA testified that Soriano claimed that Netanyahu was a “partner” in Universe Security Group. “Because of this relationship with Netanyahu,” Soriano allegedly told the subcontractor in 2006, “his door is open to me.

I remember that I expressed surprise that a senior elected public official is allegedly his partner in a financial project (Univsere Security Group). But Soriano reiterated, perhaps to impress me – Mr. Netanyahu is a partner in the venture.

The testimony continued, “Mr Soriano said – in the clearest terms- that he orchestrated a meeting between AA [Alonso Ancira, the Chairman/controlling owner of AHMSA] and Netanyahu when Netanyahu was still the Finance Minister (about a year before).

Both Soriano and Netanyahu, who was the opposition leader of the Likud party at the time of the AHMSA project, vigorously deny the claims that they were ever business partners.

Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister of Israel, tweeted about the claim that Soriano and Netanyahu were business partners, but Soriano’s attorney immediately threatened a lawsuit. Barak later deleted the tweet but did not apologize.

What cannot be denied, however, is that Netanyahu’s longtime confidant Isaac Molho received at least hundreds of thousands of dollars from Soriano’s business.

In a groundbreaking 2010 report in Israeli media and picked up by US outlets such as the New York Times and Politico, a partially handwritten list of potential Netanyahu donors was leaked. From Politico, the document was “a list, marked up with now-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handwriting, of prospective donors to his 2007 campaign — a remarkable leak…”

“The 1s indicate those whom Bibi thought likeliest to give, 2s a bit less likely, and so on. The top of the list includes big Republican donors Sheldon Adelson and Ron Lauder; Rupert Murdoch is marked a 2.”

As Forensic News pored over the list in preparation for this article, one name jumped out: Walter Soriano.

With a “1” by his name, Soriano was deemed very likely to be a big donor to the Netanyahu campaign. Charles Kushner, Jared’s father, was also listed as a “1” along with Trump business partner Tamir Sapir and former RNC finance chair Steve Wynn. Donald Trump was listed as a “3.”

In 2018, the Trump administration paid Molho’s law firm $150,000 the same month that the US Embassy was moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The law firm stated that it advised the US Consulate on “matters concerning mostly planning and building of the diplomatic compounds in Jerusalem and Israeli labor law for some 20 years.”

Both the Trump administration and the Netanyahu administration deny that the payment had anything to do with the move from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

(Hover over the chart, or click if on a mobile device, to see an explanation for each location)

UK business ventures

In the UK, Soriano has been active in the real estate market for years. Currently, Soriano is the director of seven active companies in the UK, four of which are devoted to real estate. Three of those real estate companies have combined assets of around $12 million, but also have debts just under that amount (the fourth company is yet to file public accounting records). Records also indicate that a dissolved company controlled by Soriano took out mortgages on two properties from OneSavings Bank totaling around $1.2 million.

Soriano’s largest active real estate company, WS London Management, appears to have once been active in leasing and selling real estate. The company’s website, which is no longer active, listed seven properties as part of its portfolio as recently as 2014, according to an Internet archive. One of those properties was sold in 2015 to a Panama shell company, for £1.55 million. There seems to be no active website for WS London Management, and the company could not be reached for comment.

Overall, Soriano has been involved in 12 British companies since 1981. The long list displays some bizarre patterns. For example, Soriano registered companies under the names Tov 7, Tov 77, and Tov 777 (“tov” is Hebrew for “good”). Soriano also registered Cross Roads Properties and Cross Roads Properties 2. Nearly all of Soriano’s registered companies list the same London address.

Two of Soriano’s active British companies list Orly Weinberger as a current or former co-director. Weinberger, a former lawyer, is also the director of a London-based property investment firm. In two other ventures, Soriano partnered with Simon Bird, a 76 year-old English historian. Bird and his partner, Winston Churchill’s great-granddaughter in-law, sold their Dorset mansion in 2014 to the Lord Mayor of London for £3 million. Soriano also partnered with the lawyer Shlomo Rechtschaffen, the Executive Director of British Friends of Bar-Ilan University (BFBIU), a non-profit devoted to promoting the Israeli university in the UK. He once appeared with Haim Tomer, an ex-Mossad official, at a 2017 event hosted by BFBIU.

Far left: Ex-Mossad top official Haim Tomer.Second from right: Israeli Ambassador Mark RegevFar right: Shlomo Rechtschaffen

Source: Times of Israel

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Secret List of Documents Seized From Mar-a-Lago Released Online

Trump-GettyImages-1243314153-1200x756.jp

A secret list detailing some of the documents seized from former President Donald Trump was released online overnight, even though a judge ordered the list to remain under seal.

The five-page list included specific descriptions of documents sized from Mar-a-Lago in August that the government has set aside as potentially being protected by privilege. According to the list, the documents include an internal analysis on the commutation of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, an unsigned letter from attorneys to former special counsel Robert Mueller, a Senate clemency request for “RN,” a medical letter, and tax forms.

Also included was a confidential settlement agreement between the Professional Golfers’ Association and Trump Golf, a settlement agreement in another case, documents from an agreement involving the Trump Media Group, and a signed letter from a Trump campaign legal adviser to the Joe Biden campaign.

The list was contained in two exhibits filed in court in August by the Department of Justice. The exhibits were attached to a document that updated the court on the status of the review of potentially privileged material. Government lawyers filed the document and the exhibits under seal.

The main document was unsealed on Oct. 3 on orders from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointee overseeing the case.

But Cannon explicitly said the attachments were to remain sealed “for purposes of protecting claims of attorney-client privilege.”

Bloomberg reporter Zoe Tillman obtained the list from the court docket and published it online. The exhibits “appeared to be inadvertently publicly docketed for a time,” Tillman said.

The exhibits are back under seal as of Oct. 5, The Epoch Times has confirmed.

The case is being handled in the U.S. District Court in Fort Pierce, Florida.

Yvette Alexander, the deputy in charge of the court, told The Epoch Times that she would look into what happened.

“I need to determine who unsealed it,” she said.

Attorneys for Trump did not respond to a request for comment.

Neither the Department of Justice nor Trump wanted the exhibits unsealed, according to an earlier filing.

“The United States is not seeking to unseal Exhibit A or B or otherwise unseal attorney-client privileged information,” U.S. lawyers said in that motion.

Trump lawyers opposed unsealing any of the three documents, including the main document.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

The Truth About Communism: What Every Person Needs to Know

Karl_Marx_crp.jpg

Commentary

In the special series “The Dark Origins of Communism,” Joshua Philipp, an investigative journalist for The Epoch Times, offers a chilling and eye-opening history of the origins of communism and the horrifying results that followed. The informative program on EpochTV walks viewers through the ideological principles on which communism, Marxism, and socialism are founded and examines how it is necessary for communist messaging to create division and strife in society to achieve its desired goal.

Communism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers a Nightmare

Communism pursues an imagined future utopia by creating a dystopia. Karl Marx, the father of Marxism, believed that struggle led to social evolution. His communist system thus tried to incite struggle to hasten progress—a process that required fomenting economic, social, and moral collapse.

This is seen in the sheer horror that communism has brought to every area of the world it has touched. In the last 100 years, communist regimes have claimed over 100 million to 150 million lives in their pursuit of “progress.” Communism has created societies where power is held by a small group that enslaves entire nations and where killing, reeducation-through-labor camps, censorship, and slavery become part of everyday life.

Communism’s appetite for never-ending destruction and bloodlust is evident in all of its subsequent systems. Although the names of communist organizations change with modern times, history consistently shows us the truth about communism: that although it promises heaven on earth, it instead delivers a living hell. And chaos and horror follow whenever religion, morals, and respect for society are destroyed. Lastly, it shows us that “enlightened” ideas that seek to strip humans of rights endowed by God and replace them with government authority lead solely to oppression and death.

Abolish Religion and Morals

A key goal of communism is to erase pre-existing morals in a society. For this to be done, the government must replace them with their own code of ethics, which is to obey the communist party at the expense of humanity. Under the communist system of dialectical materialism, everything in the universe amounts to “matter in motion,” meaning that individuals are nothing more than a clump of physical cells. The souls, emotions, mental health, and well-being of human beings are not part of the communist equation.

The thought process that communist systems instill in people is inverted. On the surface, communism claims to empower the people so they can be happy. Instead, it disempowers them so they can be subjugated. This is why communism aggressively seeks to destroy spirituality. They must do this because spirituality itself poses a threat to communism. Even the notion of a soul threatens communism because a soul carries an inner moral compass that is uniquely yours. If a person’s moral compass contradicts what communism dictates, that is a threat. Communism does not want people to have convictions. Instead, it wants them to follow orders. Communists lead society to believe that morality, faith, and ethics are wrong, but famine, oppression, and struggle are right—when they serve the party.

Therefore, communism arises after all morals, traditions, beliefs, institutions, hierarchy, and values have been destroyed. Communism convinces people that it intends to bring them happiness, but this happiness can only be achieved after a segment of society is either suppressed or eradicated. Therefore, it provides conditional happiness at the expense of one’s morals.

Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn said, “The failings of human consciousness, deprived of its divine dimension, have been a determining factor in all the major crimes of this century.” When faith is destroyed and the foundations of morality are overturned, the government becomes the highest power and the basis of morality.

Destabilize Society Through Division and Strife

The EpochTV series explains that since communists believe progress can only be attained through struggle, they try to fast-track “progress” by engineering struggle. Their formula for doing so is quite simple. Marxist theoretician Georgi Valentinovich Plekhanov wrote in “Dialectic and Logic” in 1928 that the communist dialectic follows three laws: to identify, to contradict, and to “exclude the middle.”

First, they “identify” an issue in society. Then, they “contradict” it by sharpening that issue into two antagonistic extremes. The chosen issue is then polarized and distributed to the media—via state mouthpieces—in a campaign designed to create division and cause struggle. In this campaign, the goal is to “exclude the middle,” meaning there is no tolerance for moderates. In the Soviet Union, Vladimir Lenin categorized all people into two groups: those who supported the communist revolution and those who did not. And those who did not were marked for destruction.

Communists favor extremes, intentionally discounting the often wide variety of moderate viewpoints because they do not serve the communist narrative. Traditional dialectics aim to help people understand truths by exchanging varying ideas and looking at both sides of an issue. Karl Marx’s concept of dialectical materialism, which is at the heart of modern communism, does the opposite. It looks at various topics in society and identifies their polar opposites. It then makes those opposites the communist viewpoint and pushes these viewpoints as being absolute and unquestionable.

Total Control Over Society

In an ideal communist state, the government controls everything—public and private. While modern-day socialists want to divorce themselves from the failed institutions of Nazism and fascism, the truth is that they adopt many of the same interventionist policies and underlying ideas. For socialism to be effective, it must destabilize the existing social order via chaos and violence. It does this by intentionally propping up “crises” and class enemies to blame so that people will be fed up enough to settle for a “new” system—which socialists will ensure is their system.

Religion establishes morals and values that are higher than government. The Constitution of the United States establishes rights that come from God, not the government. Because of these beliefs, both have become the enemies of any tyrant looking to expand power over a society. This EpochTV series shows how every real-world example of communism proves that although communism claims to be “for the people,” that lie only serves to justify its plan of building an all-powerful authoritarian state.

Watch “The Dark Origins of Communism” on Epoch Cinema here.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Trump asks Supreme Court to intervene in Mar-a-Lago fight

Trump_Legal_Troubles_60663.jpg-c2dcc_c0-

Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the legal fight over classified documents seized from his Mar-a-Lago residence.

In a 296-page filing, Mr. Trump‘s legal team asked Justice Clarence Thomas to issue an emergency order that would restore a so-called special master’s authority to review roughly 100 documents found at Mar-a-Lago with classified markings.

Justice Thomas is the judge who receives Supreme Court emergency requests out of Florida. Although it is unclear if he will act alone or refer the petition to the full court.

If granted, it would bolster Mr. Trump‘s effort to keep those documents out of the hands of investigators examining whether he criminally mishandled government materials.

A three-judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals last month ruled that the special master, a retired judge who is tasked with determining which documents are protected by attorney-client and executive privilege, could only review a limited set of seized materials.

In filings with the high court, Mr. Trump‘s lawyers argued that the 11th Circuit’s ruling violated legal precedents.

“This unwarranted stay should be vacated as it impairs substantially the ongoing time-sensitive work of the special master,” they wrote. “Moreover, any limit on the comprehensive and transparent review of materials seized in the extraordinary raid of a president’s home erodes public confidence in our system of justice.”

Mr. Trump’s team also said that the 11th Circuit didn’t have the authority to restrict U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie, who was appointed as a special master, from reviewing the documents.

“The Eleventh Circuit granted a stay of the Special Master Order, effectively compromising the integrity of the well-established policy against piecemeal review without justification,” they wrote.

In last month’s ruling, the three-judge panel, which included two judges nominated by Mr. Trump and one by President Obama, rejected Mr. Trump’s claims that classified documents seized from Mar-a-Lago may belong to him rather than the government.

The appellate court also allowed the Justice Department to access the seized documents for its criminal probe of Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump asked the Supreme Court to ensure the special master will review those documents, but did not request the court restore the hold that blocked the Justice Department from accessing the documents during its investigation.

His legal team disputed the Justice Department’s claims that including the documents in the special master review could put the U.S.’ sensitive security secrets at risk.

“The government argued on appeal without explanation that showing the purportedly classified documents to Judge Dearie would harm national security,” they wrote, adding that the position “cannot be reconciled” with the Justice Department saying it could show those documents to a grand jury or potential witnesses during interviews.

Mr. Trump would need five justices to agree with him to get an emergency order. Although the court has a 6-3 conservative majority, including three justices Mr. Trump appointed, he has had a spotty record before the nation’s highest court.

In 2021 the Supreme Court turned away Mr. Trump’s legal challenge to overturn the results of the previous year’s presidential election. The high court also rejected Mr. Trump’s efforts to shield his financial records from Congress. In January, the court denied Mr. Trump’s attempt to stop White House documents from being turned over to the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

• Jeff Mordock can be reached at jmordock@washingtontimes.com.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Talk of ‘Civil War,’ Ignited by Mar-a-Lago Search, Is Flaring Online

00pol-civilwar-Mar-a-Lago03-facebookJumb

  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

    Give this articleGive this articleGive this article
Trump supporters outside Mar-a-Lago after the F.B.I.’s search in August. More Americans are anticipating, or even welcoming, the possibility of sustained political violence, researchers studying extremism say.

Trump supporters outside Mar-a-Lago after the F.B.I.’s search in August. More Americans are anticipating, or even welcoming, the possibility of sustained political violence, researchers studying extremism say.Credit…Marco Bello/Reuters

By Ken Bensinger and Sheera Frenkel

  • Oct. 5, 2022, 5:00 a.m. ET

Soon after the F.B.I. searched Donald J. Trump’s home in Florida for classified documents, online researchers zeroed in on a worrying trend.

Posts on Twitter that mentioned “civil war” had soared nearly 3,000 percent in just a few hours as Mr. Trump’s supporters blasted the action as a provocation. Similar spikes followed, including on Facebook, Reddit, Telegram, Parler, Gab and Truth Social, Mr. Trump’s social media platform. Mentions of the phrase more than doubled on radio programs and podcasts, as measured by Critical Mention, a media-tracking firm.

Posts mentioning “civil war” jumped again a few weeks later, after President Biden branded Mr. Trump and “MAGA Republicans” a threat to “the very foundations of our republic” in a speech on democracy in Philadelphia.

Now experts are bracing for renewed discussions of civil war, as the Nov. 8 midterm elections approach and political talk grows more urgent and heated.

More than a century and a half after the actual Civil War, the deadliest war in U.S. history, “civil war” references have become increasingly commonplace on the right. While in many cases the term is used only loosely — shorthand for the nation’s intensifying partisan divisions — observers note that the phrase, for some, is far more than a metaphor.

Polling, social media studies and a rise in threats suggest that a growing number of Americans are anticipating, or even welcoming, the possibility of sustained political violence, researchers studying extremism say. What was once the subject of serious discussion only on the political periphery has migrated closer to the mainstream.

But while that trend is clear, there is far less agreement among experts about what it means.

Some elements of the far right view it literally: a call for an organized battle for control of the government. Others envision something akin to a drawn-out insurgency, punctuated with eruptions of political violence, such as the attack on the F.B.I.’s Cincinnati field office in August. A third group describes the country as entering a “cold” civil war, manifested by intractable polarization and mistrust, rather than a “hot” war with conflict.

After Donald Trump lost the 2020 election, his supporters demonstrated at the Michigan Capitol in Lansing.Credit…John Moore/Getty Images

“The question is what does ‘civil war’ look like and what does it mean,” said Elizabeth Neumann, assistant secretary for counterterrorism at the Homeland Security Department under Mr. Trump. “I did not anticipate, nor did anyone else as far as I know, how rapidly the violence would escalate.”

Ms. Neumann now works for Moonshot, a private security company that tracks extremism online. Moonshot found a 51 percent increase in “civil war” references on the most active pages on 4Chan, the fringe online message board, in the week after Mr. Biden’s Sept. 1 speech.

But talk of political violence is not relegated to anonymous online forums.

At a Trump rally in Michigan on Saturday night, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, said that “Democrats want Republicans dead,” adding that “Joe Biden has declared every freedom-loving American an enemy of the state.” At a recent fund-raiser, Michael T. Flynn, who briefly served as Mr. Trump’s national security adviser, said that governors had the power to declare war and that “we’re probably going to see that.”

On Monday, federal prosecutors showed a jury in Washington an encrypted message that Stewart Rhodes, founder of the Oath Keepers armed extremist group, had sent his lieutenants two days after the 2020 presidential election: “We aren’t getting through this without a civil war.”

Experts say the steady patter of bellicose talk has helped normalize the expectation of political violence.

In late August, a poll of 1,500 adults by YouGov and The Economist found that 54 percent of respondents who identified as “strong Republicans” believed a civil war was at least somewhat likely in the next decade. Only about a third of all respondents felt such an event was unlikely. A similar survey conducted by the same groups two years ago found nearly three in five people feeling that a “civil war-like fracture in the U.S.” was either somewhat or very unlikely.

“What you’re seeing is a narrative that was limited to the fringe going into the mainstream,” said Robert Pape, a political science professor at the University of Chicago and founder of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats.

The institute’s researchers tracked tweets mentioning civil war before and after Mr. Trump announced the search on Mar-a-Lago. In the five preceding days, they logged an average of roughly 500 tweets an hour. That jumped to 6,000 in the first hour after Mr. Trump published a post on Truth Social on the afternoon of Aug. 8, saying “these are dark times for our Nation.” The pace peaked at 15,000 tweets an hour later that evening. A week later, it was still six times higher than the baseline, and the phrase was once again trending on Twitter at month’s end.

Extremist groups have been agitating for some sort of government overthrow for years and, Mr. Pape said, the most radical views — often driven by white supremacy or religious fundamentalism — remain marginal, advanced by no more than 50,000 people nationwide.

But a far larger group, he said, are the people who have been influenced by Mr. Trump’s complaints about the “Washington swamp” and “deep state” forces working against him and his allies.

Trump supporters in Phoenix, too, protested after his election loss.Credit…Adriana Zehbrauskas for The New York Times

Those notions, stirred in a smoldering crucible with QAnon conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine views and election denialism, have fueled a growing hostility toward the federal government and rising talk about states’ rights.

“Did you know that a governor can declare war?” Mr. Flynn said at the fund-raiser on Sept. 18, for Mark Finchem, a Republican running for secretary of state in Arizona. “And we’re going to probably, we are probably going to see that.”

Neither Mr. Flynn nor Mr. Finchem responded to a request for comment about the inaccurate remarks. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war and, in fact, specifically bars states from engaging in war “unless actually invaded.”

However far-fetched, such ideas are often amplified by a proliferating set of social media channels such as the right-wing platform Gab and Mr. Trump’s Truth Social.

Social media platforms are rife with groups and boards dedicated to discussions of civil war. One, on Gab, describes itself as a place for “action reports,” “combat vids” and reports of killed in action in “the civil war that is also looking to be a 2nd American Revolution.”

In August, a single tweet stating “I think civil war has just been declared” managed to reach over 17 million profiles despite coming from an account with under 14,000 followers, according to Cybara, an Israeli firm that monitors misinformation.

“Ideas go into echo chambers and it’s the only voice that’s heard; there are no voices of dissent,” said Kurt Braddock, an American University professor who studies how terrorist groups radicalize and recruit.

Mr. Braddock said he did not believe these posts indicated any planning for a war. But he worries about what academics call “stochastic terrorism” — seemingly random acts of violence that are, in fact, provoked by “coded language, dog whistles and other subtext” in statements by public figures.

A rally in Holland, Mich., in 2021 at a restaurant that had defied state pandemic measures.Credit…Emily Rose Bennett for The New York Times

Mr. Trump is adept at making such statements, said Mr. Braddock, citing Mr. Trump’s April 2020 tweet reading “Liberate Michigan!” Less than two weeks later, mobs of heavily armed protesters occupied the state capitol in East Lansing. He also pointed to Mr. Trump’s speech before the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, when he encouraged thousands of supporters to march to the U.S. Capitol and, later in the same remarks told them, “if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

“The statements Trump makes are not overt calls to action, but when you have a huge and devoted following, the chances that one or more people are activated by that are high,” Mr. Braddock said.

A spokesman for Mr. Trump did not respond to requests for comment.

Mr. Trump used the term “civil war” in 2019, when he declared in a tweet that “it will cause a Civil War-like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal” if he was removed from office. Last month, Mr. Trump said there would be “problems in this country the likes of which perhaps we’ve never seen before” if he was indicted over his handling of the classified documents that were the target of the F.B.I. search.

Other Republicans have used language suggesting the country is on the brink. Ms. Greene wrote in August that the Mar-a-Lago search reflected the “type of things that happen in countries during civil war,” in posts to her nearly 900,000 combined followers on Facebook and Telegram. Senator Rick Scott of Florida likened the F.B.I. to the Gestapo, the secret police in Nazi Germany, saying “this cannot be our country.”

Late last month, Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican, told The Texas Tribune he believed immigration legislation was unlikely in part because of a “political civil war.” He has made similar comments before, including a November 2021 call for Texas to secede if Democrats “destroy the country.”

Nick Dyer, a spokesman for Ms. Greene, said that she was “vehemently opposed to political violence” and that her civil war comments were about Democrats, who “are acting like a regime launching a war on their opposition.”

McKinley Lewis, communications director for Mr. Scott, said he had “ZERO tolerance for violence of any kind” but added that he “continues to demand answers” related to the F.B.I.’s Mar-a-Lago search.

Republicans have often argued that their language is political rhetoric and blamed Democrats for twisting it to stoke divisions. It’s Democrats and the left, they said, who are courting violence by labeling Mr. Trump’s supporters adherents of what Mr. Biden has called “semi-fascism.”

In response to a query about Mr. Cruz’s comments, Maria Jeffrey Reynolds, a spokeswoman for the senator, said Mr. Cruz placed blame on President Biden, claiming that he has “driven a wedge down the middle of our country.”

After President Biden delivered his speech on democracy, Brian Gibby, a freelance data entry specialist in Charlotte, N.C., wrote in a Substack post that he believed “the Second Civil War began” with the president’s remarks.

“I have never seen a more divisive, hate-filled speech from an American president,” Mr. Gibby wrote.

President Biden described Mr. Trump and his loyalists as a threat to “the very foundations of our republic” in a speech on democracy in Philadelphia.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

Asked by The New York Times to explain his views, Mr. Gibby said he believed Mr. Biden was “escalating a hot conflict in America.” He worries something will happen around the November elections that will be “akin to Jan. 6, but much more violent,” where armed protest groups from both sides of the political spectrum come to blows.

“Plan ahead, stock up, stay safe, get out of cities if you can,” he wrote.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Suspension of Whistleblower FBI Agent Illegal: Kash Patel

kash-patel-with-mic-1200x800.jpg

The suspension of an FBI agent who raised concerns about bureau policies not being followed is illegal, according to former congressional investigator Kash Patel.

FBI agent Steve Friend came forward in September to assert that the FBI was violating policies by assigning cases to field offices around the country but actually having the cases managed by officials based in Washington. He said his concerns were ignored by supervisors. Friend was later suspended pending an investigation.

“What happened was actually illegal,” Patel, a former national security adviser for the House Intelligence Committee, said on the latest episode of his EpochTV show, “Kash’s Corner.”

“His badge and gun, the means that FBI agents actually perform their duties in the field, were taken from him. And this is after Director Chris Wray went up to Congress and testified … under oath whether whistleblowers would be retaliated against, and he said no under oath. So he has just committed another offense under the law and lied to Congress because we have non-irrefutable proof that basically [Friend] is no longer able to work.”

Patel referenced the Whistleblower Protection Act, which protects government employees who disclose information if the employee “reasonably believes evidences” that an activity constituting “a violation of any law, rules, or regulations; or gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety” is occurring. The law also bars retaliation against whistleblowers.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) have said that Friend engaged in protected whistleblower activity. They told Wray in a recent missive that the response to Friend’s whistleblowing isn’t acceptable.

“The FBI should never suspend security clearances as a form of punishment or to retaliate against patriotic whistleblowers for stepping forward to report potential wrongdoing,” they said.

Epoch Times Photo FBI special agent Steve Friend in a file image. (Courtesy of Steve Friend)

An FBI spokesperson told The Epoch Times previously that bureau workers who don’t perform their jobs “are held accountable through an objective administrative process” and that workers who report evidence of wrongdoing through a protected disclosure “are protected from retaliation.”

Patel noted that more than a dozen whistleblowers have approached Republican members of Congress, including Friend, with information and that Republican Party members have vowed to probe the agency if they flip control of the House of Representatives or the Senate in the upcoming midterm elections.

That would give Republican committee chairs subpoena power. Top Republicans have already been notifying FBI personnel to preserve records and other documents in preparation.

“We saw the power of congressional subpoenas … and how it was rightly applied when we did Russiagate,” said Patel, who helped uncover key information about the counterintelligence investigation on Democrat-funded information alleging links between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia. “And so you can haul in the documents and publicize them. And you can see if they hid the documents after members of Congress told them not to, then you can subpoena them in person and put them in the seat, not for a day, but for a week or a month if [that’s what] it takes.”

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE