Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

ALS patients contend with $158K price tag on new drug

WASHINGTON (AP) — For two years, Becky Mourey pushed the Food and Drug Administration to approve an experimental drug for her Lou Gehrig’s disease.

She went to members of Congress and health regulators to make the case for Relyvrio, until patient-advocates finally prevailed.

In September, Relyvrio became only the third drug approved in the U.S. for ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, an incurable neurodegenerative disease that is usually fatal within five years. But patients and physicians who celebrated Relyvrio’s approval several months ago are now contending with the obstacles posed by the U.S. health care system.

Their odyssey is an object lesson in the soaring cost of specialty drugs and the byzantine systems that insurers have created to try and control them.

Patients with insurance coverage say the $158,000 per year price tag set by drugmaker Amylyx Pharmaceutical is fueling insurance delays or denials, and sometimes exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses.

Mourey’s insurer initially refused to cover Relyvrio, but reversed itself seven weeks later after online pressure— including social media posts by Mourey and other ALS advocates.

“Amylyx priced it way too high,” said Mourey, 58, a former music teacher, who now communicates using a vision-controlled speech computer. “They could cut the price in half and still make a hefty profit.”

Even when Relyvrio is covered, some patients see themselves shouldering co-payments between $1,000 and $4,000 per month.

Unlike those patients, the Moureys have been exempt from copays due to a combination of company-managed Medicare and Medicaid coverage.

Some ALS patients are covered by private plans, while others receive government coverage through programs like Medicare.

In both cases, patients and their doctors can face onerous requirements to document their condition before insurers will pay for an expensive new treatment. Additionally, many insurers require patients to pay a percentage of their pharmacy costs. With many drugmakers now charging upwards of $100,000 for drugs approved for hard-to-treat illnesses, even a 5% copay can become unaffordable. The trend has increasingly made the drug industry deeply unpopular in the U.S.

Drugmakers say their prices reflect the years of costly clinical trials needed to win FDA approval.

Amylyx said the delays in coverage for Relyvrio are normal because many insurers are still writing their policies for the drug. The company also highlighted its multiple programs to help patients with costs, including providing the drug for free to the uninsured and covering copays for those who qualify for assistance.

The issues surrounding Relyvrio’s price highlight industry practices that have long been blamed for driving up U.S. health costs: drugmakers can patent new combinations of old ingredients and then charge whatever price the market will bear.

Insurers have responded with extra review hurdles. Those delays weigh heavily on patients with ALS which is measured in the monthly loss of functions like walking, speaking and swallowing.

“It’s just stressful and aggravating to get these multiple denial letters,” said Jim Mourey, who cares for his wife full time at their home in Hopkinton, Massachusetts.

Relyvrio is a powder-based formulation that combines two older ingredients: a prescription drug for liver disorders and a supplement used in traditional Chinese medicine that’s available on Amazon.com for about $1 per day’s supply.

Insurers typically won’t pay for ALS patients to receive the prescription ingredient, because it’s not approved for their disease. But some patients have gotten their plans to cover it or have found lower-price versions — for less than $600 a month— at specialty pharmacies. That’s led some patients to skip the new drug entirely by obtaining its two ingredients separately.

Analysts expect Relyvrio to generate $450 million in annual sales for Amylyx by 2024. It’s the company’s first product.

One group that analyzes drug pricing said a fair price for Relyvrio would be between $9,100 and $30,700 per year. The drug showed some effectiveness in slowing the progression of ALS, based on patient questionnaires. Amylyx is conducting a larger study to answer lingering questions about its effectiveness, including whether it extends survival.

Layne Oliff, 63, hasn’t yet decided whether to seek coverage from his Medicare plan. Under the federal program, he would likely owe $7,400 in copays for Relyvrio before reaching his out-of-pocket maximum. That’s on top of monthly administration fees of over $600.

But if he pays cash, Oliff says he can buy the prescription ingredient in the drug for $550 per month, or $6,600 per year, from a specialty pharmacy. He can get the supplement online for about $30 a month.

“You’re talking about a drug that’s not a cure, though it has helped slow the progression” said Oliff, who trained as a pharmacist. “But I don’t want to leave my wife someday in a financial hole; I’m not going to spend all my money on this drug.”

Amylyx has set up a program to cover the copay costs for patients with private insurance. But that financial assistance cannot be used for federal plans like Medicare and the Veterans Administration, which cover many ALS patients. After initially restricting coverage, the VA recently broadened its eligibility.

Other insurers are initially rejecting coverage or requiring multiple rounds of documentation from doctors.

“When someone’s lifespan is measured in months, making people go through these multiple rounds of review is just cruel,” said Neil Thakur of the ALS Association. The group invested in Amylyx’s early research and stands to recoup that investment.

Dr. Terry Heiman-Patterson, a neurologist at Temple University, says it’s taken about four to six hours of phone calls with insurers to get each new patient on Relyvrio.

Heiman-Patterson warns her patients to expect weeks of back-and-forth before getting the drug.

“This is the process we’re going to have to go through and I don’t know what your copay is going to be in the end,’” she says.

Some patients who are already taking a do-it-yourself approach to the treatment see little reason to change.

Sarah Nauser, a former police officer, says her insurance has covered the prescription ingredient in Relyvrio — sodium phenylbutyrate — for a $10 copay since 2020.

“After seeing all the difficulties that people are having, I’m not going to mess with what’s working,” said Nauser, 34, who credits the combination with slowing her disease and helping her to maintain her ability to walk, talk and feed herself.

The co-founders of Cambridge, Massachusetts.-based Amylyx theorize that the two chemicals in their drug work together to shield cells from premature death. But there’s little agreement among scientists about how the drug works, or even which ingredient is responsible for its benefit.

A small European study of the supplement contained in Relyvrio showed a larger effect on slowing ALS than Amylyx’s study. And researchers there are conducting a larger, 300-patient study of the ingredient.

“That study could be hugely important in telling us whether this one ingredient–which is very inexpensive– is actually effective,” said Diana Zuckerman of the non-profit National Center for Health Research, which analyzes medical research.

___

Follow Matthew Perrone on Twitter: @AP_FDAwriter

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Amid ongoing controversies, Elon Musk polls his followers: ‘Should I step down as head of Twitter?’

Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, is pushing for a harder-driving culture at the company.Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, is pushing for a harder-driving culture at the company.

Carina Johansen/Getty Images

  • Elon Musk on Sunday polled his followers, asking if he should step down as the head of Twitter.
  • “I will abide by the results,” Musk wrote, and shortly after posting, the poll was in favor of him leaving.
  • Twitter has faced ongoing controversy since the billionaire’s acquisition in October.

Amid ongoing controversies and concerns from advertisers, Elon Musk on Sunday asked his followers if he should step down as the head of Twitter.

“Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll,” Musk wrote.

 

—Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 18, 2022

It is unclear who might replace Musk or when he might step down, should he resign as head of the company.

Within 30 minutes of posting, the poll had received more than two million votes with the results slightly favoring Musk stepping down. At the time of publication, 56.7% of respondents voted ‘yes’ to Musk’s question.

In a separate tweet after creating the poll, Musk posted: “As the saying goes, be careful what you wish, as you might get it.”

Since taking over the social platform, Musk has made multiple policy decisions via the results of user polls — including whether to unsuspend the account of former President Donald Trump and other users banned under the previous leadership, and reinstate accounts of journalists who he said “doxxed” him by reporting on the location of his private jet.

Twitter has faced continued criticism, rising hate speech, an exodus of influential users and advertisers, and threats of international sanctions since Musk completed the $44 billion acquisition in October.

Musk and representatives for Twitter did not immediately respond to Insider’s requests for comment.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Amazon helped rescue the Ukrainian government and economy using suitcase-sized hard drives brought in over the Polish border: ‘You can’t take out the cloud with a cruise missile’

Amazon Prime package is seen at the main railway station in Krakow, Poland on March 8, 2022. (Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)Amazon Prime package is seen at the main railway station in Krakow, Poland on March 8, 2022.

Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images

  • Amazon has been supporting Ukraine since the country was invaded by Russia in February.
  • In one initiative, Amazon sent suitcase-sized computer drives to back up critical data to the cloud.
  • 10 million gigabytes of Ukrainian government and economic data have been saved so far. 

Since being invaded by Russia in February, Amazon has become an unlikely hero to the Ukrainian people, donating medical supplies, food, toys, and a $75 million investment in developing cloud-based backups of essential government data, according to a statement by the company.

Using suitcase-sized solid-state hard drives, called Snowball Edge units — delivered to Ukraine through the Polish border — Amazon has helped back up critical infrastructure and economic information beginning the day Russia launched its invasion. 

“This is the most technologically advanced war in human history,” The Los Angeles Times reported Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s 31-year-old vice prime minister and minister of digital transformation, said, adding that Amazon Web Services’ “leadership made a decision that saved the Ukrainian government and economy.”

More than 10 million gigabytes of Ukrainian government and economic data has been saved so far, including data from “27 Ukrainian ministries, 18 Ukrainian universities, the largest remote learning K–12 school (serving hundreds of thousands of displaced children), and dozens of other private sector companies,” according to a statement from Amazon.

On February 24, the day Russia invaded Ukraine, Liam Maxwell, Amazon Web Services’ director of government transformation, met with Ukrainian Ambassador Vadym Prystaiko to discuss how the company could assist Ukraine. The pair quickly came up with a plan for saving the country’s most essential data.

While it is unclear if Amazon has assisted other countries with such data transfers previously, Maxwell told The Los Angeles Times reported several East Asian countries have since inquired about out-of-the-country cloud backups of their government’s data.

On November 29, Fedorov and Maxwell signed a memo agreeing to continue the partnership into 2023. 

“AWS made one of the biggest contributions to Ukraine’s victory by providing the Ukrainian government with access and resources for migrating to the cloud and securing critical information,” Fedorov said at the signing. 

In July, Amazon was awarded the Ukrainian peace prize for its work assisting the invaded country in backing up essential files to the cloud. While much of the data is transferred to the cloud through secure networks, the Snowball Edge units, still loaded with terabytes of critical information, are then shipped back to Amazon for safekeeping and to complete the data transfer. 

“It’s a tense moment around the baggage carousel,” The Los Angeles Times reported Maxwell said. “Here’s government in a box, literally.”

With the valuable drives safely stored and data uploaded, critical information regarding Ukraine’s economy, tax and banking systems, and property records are prevented from theft and intentional damage from the Russian invasion.

“You can’t take out the cloud with a cruise missile,” The Los Angeles Times reported Maxwell said.

Additional companies, including FedEx, The Clorox Company, and Microsoft, have also assisted the war effort in Ukraine, either through direct financial donations or offering specific services, and suspending business in Russia. The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship has reported more than 50 companies that have followed suit. 

Representatives for Amazon and the office of President Zelenskyy did not immediately respond to Insider’s requests for comment.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

“I don“t trust it:“ Vaccine hesitancy lingers even as China COVID cases surge

2022-12-19T00:06:07Z

A resident receives a nasal spray COVID-19 booster vaccine in Beijing, China December 17, 2022 in this still image obtained from a video. REUTERS TV/via REUTERS

Headhunter Candice knows the COVID-19 infections engulfing Beijing and much of China will soon hit her home of Shenzhen city, but she would rather face it without a vaccine booster, saying she fears potential side effects more than the virus.

The 28-year-old took two doses of Sinovac’s CoronaVac last year, hoping it would make travel easier, but she has since grown more sceptical, citing stories from friends about health impacts, as well as similar health warnings on social media.

“I don’t trust it,” she said, speaking on the condition that only her first name be used. Candice said she has refused to participate in recent vaccination drives organised by her local community.

Candice is part of a group that demonstrates how vaccine hesitancy still runs deep in mainland China, academics say, which poses a growing headache for Beijing as it tries to persuade more to get vaccinated in the face of a spike in infections after the lifting of strict anti-COVID measures.

Officially, China’s vaccination rate is above 90%, but the rate for boostered adults drops to 57.9%, and to 42.3% for people aged 80 and above, according to government data, prompting warnings that the country could see over 1.5 million deaths after lifting curbs such as lockdowns and mass testing that held most virus spread at bay. read more

In September, an article by a publication under the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledged coverage of older adults was poor, and that the absence of local doctors in vaccine drives, poor medical understanding and a lack of insurance for potential side effects all dampened enthusiasm.

“It’s a very special case in China because people felt very safe for a long time,” said Stephanie Jean-Tsang, an assistant professor at Hong Kong Baptist University who specialises in messaging around health.

“People need to realise what the risks are and how beneficial the vaccines are – it took time for Hong Kong citizens and the elderly to realise this as well.”

Authorities have not made vaccination mandatory amid signs that the public would push back against any such move. Last week China said it would start to offer a second booster – or fourth shot – for high-risk groups and people over 60 years old.

Overseas-developed vaccines are unavailable in mainland China to the general public, which has relied on inactivated shots by Sinopharm, Sinovac’s Coronavac and other domestically developed options for its vaccine rollout and which the medical community has found to be safe. It has also yet to introduce its own version of an mRNA vaccine.

While China’s medical community in general doesn’t doubt the safety of China’s vaccines, questions remain over their efficacy compared to foreign-made mRNA counterparts, said Kelly Lei, a doctor in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen.

In late November, the hashtag ‘Sinovac vaccine counterfeit’ surged to five million views on the Twitter-like Weibo platform, with many posts discussing lumps and hair loss allegedly caused by the locally made vaccine.

“At least a half of doctors and educated people wanted to get the mRNA ones and refused to get the Chinese ones,” Lei said.

“After a while, people see no hope and also they are kind of forced to get the Chinese ones, so they had to accept it. Some doctors talked to me, and said it’s useless anyway, why waste the money.”

Lei said many of her friends are looking to visit the neighbouring Chinese territory of Macau, where mainlanders can receive mRNA vaccines.

Demand has surged in recent weeks, visitors to Macau say, with the online booking platform for vaccination showing no bookings available until Jan. 21.

But after jettisoning some of the world’s toughest anti-COVID curbs last week, China is now experiencing a wave of infections across the country, prompting some unable to travel to Macau or abroad to opt for the Chinese vaccines in desperation.

“In Guangzhou…things have started to get wild. They at least want something for some protection,” Lei said.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

36 treated for injuries after turbulence on Hawaii flight

(NewsNation) — At least 36 people were treated for injuries at an airport in Honolulu after a Hawaiian Airlines flight coming from Phoenix, Arizona, experienced severe turbulence about 30 minutes outside of Honolulu, NewsNation affiliate KHON reports.

The Honolulu Emergency Medical Services and American Medical Response said they responded to a mass casualty emergency at the Daniel K. Inouye International Airport at around 11:06 a.m. Sunday.

According to reports, paramedics and EMTs treated 36 patients on the scene, and of those, 20 patients, ranging from adults to a 14-month-old, were transported to multiple hospitals for serious head injuries, loss of consciousness, cuts and bruises.

At least 11 people are in serious condition with nine listed in stable condition.

This is a developing story. Updates will be posted here.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Musk launches poll asking if he should step down from Twitter

2022-12-18T23:35:45Z

A 3D printed Twitter logo is seen in front of a displayed photo of Elon Musk in this illustration taken October 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

Elon Musk launched a poll on Sunday asking: “Should I step down as head of Twitter?

He added, “I will abide by the results of this poll.”

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Won’t be long now…

19121c5c768fb6ee35d5576afe2d9a7f?s=100&d

Help support Palmer Report! Our articles are all 100% free to read, with no forced subscriptions and nothing hidden behind paywalls. If you value our content, you’re welcome to pay for it:

Pay $5 to Palmer Report:

Pay $25 to Palmer Report:

Pay $75 to Palmer Report:



It won’t be long now. There is a treasure trove that awaits us all. These are the criminal charges that the January 6 committee will be voting on to refer to the department of justice. Monday is the day that will happen. And the buzz is that there just might be more than one criminal referral against Donald Trump.

Politico is saying that, in fact, there are three criminal charges the committee will urge the Department of justice to consider. One of those is obstruction of an official proceeding. Another is conspiracy to defraud the United States Government. And the third is sedition.

It is being said that the January 6 report — long awaited will say that “Trump did not need an express agreement with rioters” to be guilty of sedition — but rather, “simply needed to provide aid or comfort.”

“Aid or comfort.” It is those three words that jump out at me. Can anyone really doubt that Trump provided “Aid or comfort?” He spurred them on. He planted the idea oh so lovingly in their little heads. He invented them. He said, on social media, to come forth. That it would be “wild.” He invited them, and his words caressed the anger centers in their brains.

He created his soldiers for battle. He tinkered with their minds, sowing the seeds of hate in their brains, filling them with deranged fury. And then he left them. But they didn’t appear to care. They did what he seemed to want them to do. In the spirit of Charles Manson, Trump turned them into his personal weapons of mass destruction, eagerly willing to love, honor, and always to obey.


And then, once the hate had manifested through the Capitol walls, he did nothing. He did nothing for hours except reportedly watching the goings-on on television. Perhaps he nibbled a cheeseburger. One thing he DIDN’T do was stop the madness. It seemed to please him.

And what has he done since? He’s talked about potential pardons for the terrorists. He’s commiserated with them. And he’s shown sympathy for them. Yes, he aided AND abetted and gave comfort. He created, birthed and designed the terror AND the terrorists, all from the comfort of the White House. A referral for insurrection? There is more than enough evidence for that.

Save Palmer Report! Our articles are all 100% free to read, with no forced subscriptions and nothing hidden behind paywalls. If you value our content, you’re welcome to pay for it:

Pay $5 to Palmer Report:

Pay $25 to Palmer Report:

Pay $75 to Palmer Report:

Write for the Palmer Report Community Section.

Help support Palmer Report! Our articles are all 100% free to read, with no forced subscriptions and nothing hidden behind paywalls. If you value our content, you’re welcome to pay for it:

Pay $5 to Palmer Report:

Pay $25 to Palmer Report:

Pay $75 to Palmer Report:

The post Won’t be long now… appeared first on Palmer Report.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

World Cup final ends just in time for Fox’s NFL coverage

Kylian Mbappé and Lionel Messi provided more drama leading up to Sunday’s early NFL games on Fox than Howie Long and Terry Bradshaw.

Sunday’s World Cup final in Qatar between Argentina and France went to extra time and penalty kicks, bumping Fox’s “NFL Sunday” pregame show off the air. The fútbol ended just in time for Americans to catch kickoff for the football at 1 p.m. EST.

Argentina’s Gonzalo Montiel knocked in the decisive penalty kick at 12:55 p.m. That gave Fox a couple of minutes to capture Argentina’s celebration and allowed commentators some time to provide thoughts before the network switched to NFL.

At the beginning of extra time, Fox said via social media that the trophy ceremony would air on FS1. A graphic on Fox immediately after the match ended also told viewers to switch to FS1.

Had the game finished in regulation, Fox’s plan was to air the trophy ceremony before going to NFL pregame coverage at 12:30 p.m.

Some soccer fans were not happy with the trophy presentation being booted to a Fox sister channel.

The possibility of the World Cup colliding with kickoffs of NFL games did prompt some funny exchanges on social media.

Some NFL teams caught a little bit of World Cup fever. One of the video boards at MetLife Stadium showed the penalty kicks as the New York Jets and Detroit Lions were taking the field. The penalty kicks were also aired in Houston before the Texans took on the Kansas City Chiefs.

Ratings for Sunday’s final are expected to be released Sunday and should be higher than the 12.51 million viewers Fox averaged for the 2018 final between France and Croatia.

___

AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl and https://twitter.com/AP_NFL

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Ministers near global deal at landmark U.N. nature talks

2022-12-18T22:31:47Z

People take part in a march during COP15, the two-week U.N. Biodiversity summit in Montreal, Quebec, Canada December 10, 2022. REUTERS/Christinne Muschi/File Photo

Negotiators at a U.N. summit to protect nature were closing in on a new global deal on Sunday that could see 30% of the world’s land and seas protected by 2030, with hundreds of billions of dollars directed toward conserving wild places and species.

China, the president of the COP15 conference in Montreal, released a proposed text on Sunday morning that ministers welcomed, with some reservations.

“Another potential round of work needs to be done so we can align the resources and the ambition,” said Colombia Environment Minister Susana Muhamad. “But I’m very optimistic that, as the main goals have been landed and there is no, in general, opposition to these goals, we have made a very important step forward.”

Policymakers hope an ambitious deal can spur nature conservation in the same way that an international pact in Paris in 2015 helped mobilize efforts to limit planet-warming carbon emissions.

The draft, based on the last two weeks of talks, sets a crucial financial target of $200 billion per year for conservation initiatives, though it demands less from wealthy countries than some developing states had wanted.

It lays out support for protecting 30% of land and waters by 2030, a landmark goal informally known as 30-by-30, and suggests restoring 30% of degraded lands.

“We were surprised that (the text) is actually capturing most of the things we want to go for,” a delegate from a European country told Reuters. On restoration, he noted the text went with a more ambitious target of 30%, instead of 20%, which “is really good and ambitious and necessary.”

Businesses should also be asked to assess and disclose how they affect and are affected by nature loss, but the current document does not make such reporting mandatory.

EU Commissioner Virginijus Sinkevicius told reporters during a break that negotiators were “on the right track to finalise” a deal, but he highlighted shortcomings on numerical targets and expressed concern about an increase in funding from developed countries.

Ministers and government officials from nearly 200 countries need to come to a consensus on 23 proposed targets by midnight on Monday (0500 GMT on Tuesday).

While optimistic, environmental campaigners worry the technical wording of the 30-by-30 target might not adequately address ocean conservation.

The target mentions protecting at least 30% of terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas.

However, it does not clarify whether this means 30% of land and separately 30% of oceans, said Brian O’Donnell, director of the non-profit Campaign for Nature, adding that China needs to quickly clarify its intent.

“The target should split land and sea to make sure 30% applies to them respectively,” said Li Shuo, senior global policy advisor at Greenpeace East Asia.

The draft recommends allocating $200 billion per year from all sources, including the public and private sectors, for conservation initiatives – a target seen as critical for the successful implementation of any deal.

Developing countries were pushing for half of that – $100 billion per year – to flow from wealthy countries to poorer nations. However, the text mentions only that $20 billion to $30 billion per year comes from developed countries by 2030.

“Probably we will have to reach an agreement between $30 billion and $100 billion,” Colombia’s Muhamad told reporters.

The draft also notes that the money could come voluntarily from any country – a nod to developed nations’ desire that countries with large economies, such as China, also contribute funds.

Having China and Arab countries joining would be “a huge step forward,” Sinkevicius said.

Asked whether China should be considered a developing country, as still defined by the World Bank, he said, “I think we should not stick to 1992 descriptions but see the reality on the ground, and it’s very different from 1992.”

One of the greatest points of contention among delegates has been whether a new fund should be established for that money, improving on an existing structure. On Wednesday morning, developing country negotiators walked out of a financing meeting in protest. The draft deal does not mention setting up a separate facility.

The text suggests harmful subsidies should be reduced by at least $500 billion per year by the end of the decade end, but does not specify whether they should be eliminated, phased out or reformed.

Other proposals include directing policymakers to “encourage and enable” businesses to monitor, assess and disclose how they affect and are affected by biodiversity, but not making these processes mandatory.

Tony Goldner, who heads a group working on a framework for companies to manage and disclose economic risks related to nature, said a number of countries and financial firms would move toward mandatory disclosure anyway.

“At an institutional level, the train has left the station in any case because financial institutions are increasingly aware that nature risk is sitting on their balance sheets.”

Lastly, risks from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals would be reduced by at least half, but the text does not address slashing their overall use.

“At the end of the day this is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss,” Sinkevicius said.

Read more:

GRAPHIC-Disappearing plants jeopardize a green future

GRAPHIC-From flickering fireflies to lowly dung beetles, insects are vanishing

GRAPHIC-How daredevil drones find nearly extinct plants hiding in cliffs

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

North Korea confirms “important“ spy satellite test for April launch

2022-12-18T22:43:33Z

A woman walks past a TV broadcasting a news report on North Korea firing a ballistic missile off its east coast, in Seoul, South Korea, December 18, 2022. REUTERS/ Heo Ran

North Korea’s state media KCNA said on Monday the country conducted an “important, final phase” test on Sunday for the development of a spy satellite, which it seeks to complete by April 2023.

The report was released a day after the South Korean and Japanese militaries reported the isolated North’s launch of two intermediate-range ballistic missiles towards its east coast.

Pyongyang’s National Aerospace Development Administration (NADA) conducted the test at its Sohae satellite launching station in the northwest to review its capability of satellite imaging, data transmission and ground control systems, according to KCNA.

A vehicle carrying a mock satellite, which also included multiple cameras, image transmitters and receivers, a control device and a storage battery, was fired at the “lofted angle” of 500 km (311 miles).

“We confirmed important technical indicators such as camera operating technology in the space environment, data processing and transmission ability of the communication devices, tracking and control accuracy of the ground control system,” a NADA spokesperson said in the KCNA dispatch.

The spokesperson called the test a “final gateway process of launching a reconnaissance satellite” which will be completed by April.

North Korea has conducted an unprecedented number of missile tests this year, including an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) designed to reach the U.S. mainland, in defiance of international sanctions.

On Friday, the North tested a high-thrust solid-fuel engine which experts said would facilitate quicker and more mobile launch of ballistic missiles, as it seeks to develop a new strategic weapon and speed up its nuclear and missile programmes.

Pyongyang has tested satellite systems during several rocket launches, and leader Kim Jong Un has said its pursuit of a spy satellite is meant to provide real-time information on military actions by the United States and its allies.

South Korea’s presidential office strongly condemned the North’s latest launch, saying its continued provocations and nuclear and missile development would only endanger its own regime.

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE