Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

I ordered the same thing in person and online at Chipotle and found no significant difference in size despite some customers’ claims

ChipotleChipotle

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

  • Chipotle customers frequently accuse the chain of making mobile orders smaller than those bought in-person.
  • I tested this claim by placing the same order through the app and in line at a local restaurant.
  • I found that mobile orders are about the same, or even larger than other orders in one case.
People have been complaining about the size of their burritos seemingly as long as Chipotle has been popular.Chipotle Burrito

Hollis Johnson

NFL player JJ Watt reignited the conversation in December by tweeting a photo of his order, saying “Burritos have been getting smaller…”.

—JJ Watt (@JJWatt) December 11, 2022

 

Many of the unhappy customers claim that their orders are smaller when they order online, and don’t get to watch the employee assemble their burrito or bowl.Chipotle Mobile Order 6

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

Source: Insider

I decided to put this theory to the test by making my own mobile order.Chipotle mobile order vs in-store order

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

I then went inside and ordered the exact same burrito and bowl in person, from the same Chipotle location.Chipotle mobile order vs in-store order

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

To be thorough, I ordered two of the same barbacoa bowl, and two of the same chicken burrito with double meat.Chipotle bowls side by side

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

The burritos each had double chicken, white rice, black beans, medium salsa, sour cream, cheese, and lettuce, which cost $8.45 apiece.Chipotle mobile order burrito in foil

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

They looked about the same size to me.Chipotle burrito in foil

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

For a more impartial measurement, I broke out my food scale.Chipotle burrito on scale

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

The in-store order was slightly heavier, but only by five grams.Chipotle burrito on scale

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

For perspective, that’s a difference in heft of about two pennies.penny stock

jodiecoston/Getty Images

Source: The Measure of Things

I also compared the two bowls, which had barbacoa, white rice, fajita, black beans, mild salsa, sour cream, and lettuce.Chipotle bowls side by side

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

To my eye, the in-person bowl seemed slightly more filled, but I once again wanted to use a more accurate measurement.Chipotle bowl

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

The mobile order bowl came out to 810 grams.Chipotle bowl on scale

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

The in-person order was actually 763 grams, a difference of nearly 50 grams.Chipotle bowl on scale

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

That’s equivalent to about one-half of a stick of butter.Butter

Kellis/Shutterstock

Source: Measuring stuff

The mobile order looked smaller at first glance, but it ended up containing more meat and rice, while the other bowl was heavier on lettuce and vegetables.Chipotle bowl

Mary Meisenzahl/Insider

Based on my experiment, I feel confident that there is no internal Chipotle conspiricy to make mobile orders smaller.Chipotle

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

Customers shifted to online ordering during the pandemic, allowing Chipotle to be able to gather more precise data about ingredient costs and customer orders.Chipotle portions

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

This led to workers being “more consistent on portioning,” and eliminating potential variations between orders, CFO Jack Hartung said in a 2021 earnings call.Chipotle portions

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

Source: Insider

Chipotle says customers don’t receive smaller portions for ordering online. “Guests of Chipotle have the opportunity to completely customize their meal in restaurants by vocalizing their desired portions, or digitally selecting extra, light, normal or on the side when choosing from the list of real ingredients,” Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Laurie Schalow told Insider in 2021.Chipotle Kitchen

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

In other words, workers might have given you extra portions from time to time pre-2020, but Chipotle has cracked down on consistency across the board.Chipotle

Hollis Johnson

I have no plans to stop mobile ordering at Chipotle because I always felt like I got the same amount of food but can skip waiting in line — and now I have the experience to prove it.A Chipotle pick-up station.A Chipotle pick-up station.

Anna Keeve

Do you have a story to share about a retail or restaurant chain? Email this reporter at mmeisenzahl@businessinsider.com.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

The US should break up monopolies – not punish working Americans for rising prices | Robert Reich

The Fed is putting people out of work to reduce workers’ bargaining power and reduce inflation. They’ve got it all wrong

Job growth and wages are slowing. Employers added 223,000 jobs in December, the labor department reported on Friday – lower than the average in recent months.

Average hourly wages rose by 4.6% in December, according to Friday’s report. That’s a slowdown from 4.8% in November.

Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His new book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com

Continue reading…

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Remembering Vivienne Westwood, Queen of Punk Fashion Design, Friend of Ukraine

b61bf4cc330c641e18b53a3b23895467.jpg?w=1

The legendary British design icon, who transformed the way we view fashion, despised the war in Ukraine.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

#FBI FBI #DOD DOD: Displayed on a bed next to the victims, the leather sheath of this fighting knife should be seen as the symbol (envelope) & the message, addressed directly to the USMC & US Military, and is the reference to their involvement in Ukraine War. kabar usmc knife GS

#FBI FBI #DOD DOD:

Displayed on a bed next to the victims, the leather sheath of this fighting knife should be seen as the symbol (envelope) & the message, addressed directly to the USMC & US Military, and is the reference to their involvement in Ukraine War.

kabar usmc knife GS

Fl8bxk-aEAEQMG6.png:large

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Kishida highlights security concerns on trip to Europe, US

TOKYO (AP) — Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida begins a weeklong trip Monday to strengthen military ties with Europe and Britain and bring into focus the Japan-U.S. alliance at a summit in Washington, as Japan breaks from its postwar restraint to take on more offensive roles with an eye toward China.

Kishida’s talks with U.S. President Joe Biden on Friday will highlight his five-nation tour that also takes him to France, Italy, Britain and Canada — some of Group of Seven nations Japan has stepped up defense ties with in recent years. His first stop is Paris on Monday evening.

Kishida said his summit with Biden will underscore the strength of the Japan-U.S. alliance and how the two countries can work more closely under Japan’s new security and defense strategies.

Japan in December adopted key security and defense reforms, including a counterstrike capability that makes a break from the country’s exclusively self-defense-only postwar principle. Japan says the current deployment of missile interceptors is insufficient to defend it from rapid weapons advancement in China and North Korea.

Kishida said he will explain to Biden the new strategy, under which Japan is also reinforcing defenses on its southwestern islands close to Taiwan, including Yonaguni and Ishigaki, where new bases are being constructed.

“Will will discuss further strengthening of the Japan-U.S. alliance, and how we work together to achieve a fee and open Indo-Pacific,” Kishida told a NHK national television talk show Sunday, referring to a vision of national and economic security cooperation the two countries promote to counter China’s growing military and economic influence.

Under the new strategies, Japan plans to start deploying in 2026 long-range cruise missiles that can reach potential targets in China, nearly double its defense budget within five years to a NATO standard of about 2% of GDP from the current 1%, and improve cyberspace and intelligence capabilities.

The idea is to do as much as possible in a short time as some experts see growing risks that Chinese President Xi Jingpin may take action against self-ruled Taiwan, which Beijing claims as part of its territory.

Japan’s new strategy has been well received by the Biden administration and some members of the Congress. Experts say it would also widen cooperation with their main regional partners Australia and possibly South Korea.

“This is an opportunity to rethink and update the structure and the mechanisms of the alliance to reflect a much more capable partner that’s coming,” said Christopher Johnstone, senior adviser and Japan chair for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

He said, however, that Japan’s focus on the strike capability and budget is a welcome but “a daunting agenda” that will require a lot of cooperation with the United States.

Paving the way for the summit, Japanese Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada and Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi will fly to Washington to meet their American counterparts, Lloyd Austin and Antony Blinken, on Wednesday, followed by separate defense ministers’ talks Thursday.

The Biden administration, which also adopted its security strategy in October, expects Japan to assist in the supply and storage of fuel and munitions in case of a Taiwan emergency, experts say. Japan and the United States are also reportedly considering establishing a joint command.

During the talks at the White House, the two leaders are also expected to discuss China, North Korea’s nuclear and missile development as well as Russia’s war on Ukraine, Japanese officials said.

Cooperation in the area of supply chain and economic security will be also on the table. Last week, Japanese Economy and Industry Minister Yasutoshi Nishimura and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo disussed in Washington the importance to work together to promote and protect critical and emerging technologies, including semiconductors, and export controls to address competitiveness and security concerns.

During his trip, Kishida will seek to further strengthen bilateral military ties with four other countries, Japanese officials say.

Japan’s joint development and production of its F-X next generation fighter jet with Britain and Italy for a planned deployment in 2035 will be a top agenda item during his visits in Rome and London on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Japan and Britain have also been discussing a Reciprocal Access Agreement that would remove obstacles to holding joint military exercises in either country. Besides the Japan-U.S. security treaty that allows U.S. troops to station in Japan, Tokyo has a similar agreement only with Australia, and Britain would be second.

During his talks with French President Emmanuel Macron, Kishida is expected to share concern over China’s growing activity in the South Pacific and confirm stepping up joint military exercise between the two sides.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Reagan’s Gardener Diplomat

In the 1960s, George Shultz chaired a task force on unemployment for the Johnson administration. The group presented what Shultz thought were good ideas, but the ideas didn’t gain traction. Johnson drew him aside and explained why. “George, if you have a good idea, and it’s your idea, it’s not going to go very far. But if it becomes my idea, it just might go somewhere. Do I make myself clear?”

Shultz never forgot the lesson. As secretary of state under Ronald Reagan, he opposed the Strategic Defense Initiative as technically infeasible and strategically destabilizing. So did Richard Burt, one of Shultz’s aides. Burt grew annoyed that Shultz didn’t protest more loudly when Reagan pressed forward on SDI. “Rick, I’ve got to remind you of something you know,” Shultz responded. “We work for the president of the United States. The president of the United States wants to do this. If you don’t want to do it, you don’t have to work for the president of the United States. But as long as you are working for the president of the United States, you are going to support this policy. Is that clear?”

Philip Taubman was a reporter specializing in national security affairs when Shultz was secretary of state; later they were colleagues at Stanford University. Taubman’s new book is a life-and-times, per the subtitle, yet it focuses on the six-and-a-half years Shultz spent as head of Reagan’s State Department. And even within that narrow window, Taubman prioritizes the evolving relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Shultz wasn’t Reagan’s first choice for secretary of state. Shultz had ample experience in government, having been secretary of labor and secretary of the Treasury for Richard Nixon. Under Nixon, Shultz picked up some other tips on the workings of Washington. “You haven’t been in this town very long, have you, Mr. Secretary,” Senator Russell Long of Louisiana remarked. “Well, I ought to tell you, there’s two types of people in Washington: the fuckers and the fuckees. And I don’t presume to be the latter.”

Shultz developed a reputation for reliability. While others—Henry Kissinger, most conspicuously—basked in the auras of their own brilliance, Shultz eschewed the spotlight. “He was a problem solver, not a zealous ideologue,” Taubman writes. “He combined policy expertise with an instinctively inclusive and effective feel for managing large organizations; he was unflappable; and he worked with a quiet competence and steadiness.”

In other words, he was just what Reagan was looking for when Alexander Haig imploded as secretary of state in 1982. Reagan had won the presidency by assailing détente with the Soviet Union and promising to take the offensive in the Cold War. His first appointees to national security posts were mostly hardliners. This approach suited Reagan’s purpose: to regain the initiative in the Cold War and put pressure on Moscow. But Reagan’s longer game was to find a way out from under the cloud of nuclear war that had hung over humanity since the 1940s.

Reagan hadn’t shared this vision with the hardliners in his administration, at least not so as to catch their attention. The appointment of the pragmatic Shultz was a shot across the hardliners’ bow. And they interpreted it as such.

Caspar Weinberger, the secretary of defense, and William Casey, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, caused trouble for Shultz from the start. Weinberger had worked for Shultz at the Bechtel Group, an international engineering firm, in the 1970s; Shultz thought Weinberger bore resentments from that time. “I know Cap well. He spends half an hour talking to refute arguments that haven’t been made,” he observed. “The hardest thing is that I used to be his boss, and at the conclusion of any discussion, I would say, ‘Cap, this is the way it is going to be done.’” Weinberger had hated that, and at every opportunity he let Shultz know he couldn’t do it any more.

Casey was a law unto himself, running covert wars in Central America and Central Asia out of his hip pocket. One reason no one could tell what Casey was up to was that no one could understand what he was saying. In Washington’s world of orators, Casey mumbled, by design. After a while it was simply too much trouble for his interlocutors to keep asking him to repeat himself, and they gave up. “I was almost afraid to have him come for lunch because he would say things and I wouldn’t understand what he was saying and maybe he’d think I agreed with him,” Shultz recalled. “People said he was the one guy in Washington who didn’t need a secure phone.”

Shultz stuck to his task despite the obstruction. He believed in a personal approach to foreign policy. He called it his “diplomatic gardening,” and it centered on developing relationships with his counterparts in other countries. “If you plant a garden and ignore it for six months, it’s taken over by weeds,” he said. “But if you keep at it, month after month, then it grows. In diplomacy, the same thing is true.”

His most important counterpart was Eduard Shevardnadze, the last—as it turned out—foreign minister of the Soviet Union. Unlike Soviet diplomats before him, Shevardnadze “came across as a real human being,” Shultz said. “Ronald Reagan started telling jokes to Eduard Shevardnadze—jokes about Communists—and Shevardnadze laughed. What a change!”

The most significant relationship of that era was the one between Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. The timing couldn’t have been better. Reagan had just been reelected when Gorbachev became the general secretary of the Soviet Communist Party. Reagan was hoping to pivot from the arms buildup of his first term to a build-down in his second. In Reagan’s mind, SDI, which threatened to take the arms race into outer space, had the ultimate purpose of rendering nuclear weapons obsolete.

Gorbachev was distrustful of SDI, but he had his own reasons for wanting to discuss arms control, namely the need to reorganize and reinvigorate the Soviet economy. Eventually Reagan and Gorbachev found their way to Iceland where they spoke sincerely—and emotionally—about the possibility of eliminating all nuclear weapons. They came close to an agreement, but Gorbachev wouldn’t countenance America’s SDI and Reagan wouldn’t give it up. At the critical moment, Reagan slipped a note to Shultz: “Am I wrong?” Shultz leaned close and whispered, “No, you are right.”

In fact, Shultz didn’t think Reagan was right. He still thought SDI a boondoggle. Afterwards, he wondered if he might have contributed more to the negotiation, which had foundered on whether SDI research would be allowed beyond the laboratory. “What exactly do you mean by laboratory?” he mused. “Is space a laboratory? When you say the word ‘laboratory,’ you think of a little room and people in white coats. But maybe we could have found out how to define laboratory in a way that would have been acceptable, but I didn’t think of that and we didn’t do that.”

Taubman admired Shultz, who died in 2021 at the age of 100. But he takes issue with some of Shultz’s decisions. Taubman faults Shultz for not doing more to stop secret sales of American weapons to Iran, the transactions at the heart of what became the Iran-contra scandal. And in the brief epilogue to the book, Taubman relates how Shultz, among many others, fell for Elizabeth Holmes and the snake oil she was selling under the Theranos blood-testing label. “I’m over 90 years old,” Shultz told his grandson, whom he had helped get a job at Theranos and who was beginning to have doubts about Holmes. “I’ve seen a lot in my time. I’ve been right almost every time, and I know I’m right about this.”

On the whole, though, Taubman makes a persuasive case that Shultz was one of the most distinguished American officials of the last half century. He agrees with Henry Kissinger, who had thought Shultz out of his depth when he took the job of secretary of state in 1982, but who changed his mind. “If I could choose one American to whom I would entrust the nation’s fate in a crisis,” Kissinger said, “it would be George Shultz.”

In the Nation’s Service: The Life and Times of George P. Shultz

by Philip Taubman

Stanford University Press, 456 pp., $35

H.W. Brands is the author of Reagan: The Life and other books on American history and foreign policy.

The post Reagan’s Gardener Diplomat appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

The Middle Kingdom’s Media Blitz

Newly elected speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy made an announcement last month with important consequences for American foreign policy. His colleague Mike Gallagher, a Marine Corps veteran and Ph.D., will lead a select committee “to expose and fight against the Chinese Communist Party’s cyber, trade, and military threats against America.” To understand some of the thorniest components of this challenge, Joshua Kurlantzick’s new book, Beijing’s Global Media Offensive, is a must-read.

Kurlantzick covers Southeast Asia for the Council on Foreign Relations, but, as he points out, that corner of the world is only one of the places where China is trying to shape the media environment to its advantage. Southeast Asia, Taiwan, Australia, and New Zealand are often “Beijing’s initial laboratory,” but China is “expanding its soft and sharp power strategies to many other parts of the world.” China has become a master of “sharp power,” which is using covert or hidden means to manipulate people and bury negative stories, sometimes even before they are written. Soft power attracts, sharp power distracts.

Starting in the 1990s, China’s communist leadership believed that China “was failing, in a world dominated by Western private media outlets and Western governments’ state media outlets, to get its preferred narratives across.” Accordingly, it tried to charm other countries by offering foreign journalists junkets and cushy fellowships, opening Confucius Institutes in universities around the world, and exporting Chinese state-controlled media. By one estimate, China devoted $10 billion annually to soft power by 2015.

Unfortunately for them, it did not work. To be sure, Xinhua, a newswire service that charges less than Reuters or the Associated Press, has been very successful. Kurlantzick warns that “newswire stories often establish initial details about a story and frame the coverage of it,” so “Xinhua will increasingly define many outlet’s news agendas.” But China’s increasingly aggressive behavior toward its neighbors has alienated public opinion in many countries. For example, Pew found that 63 percent of Filipinos viewed China favorably in 2002, but by 2014 that had dropped to 38 percent. COVID drove China’s approval rating down sharply elsewhere. China’s soft power offensive failed as miserably as Russia’s attack on Kiev last year.

Unfortunately for us, China has other tools. Kurlantzick calls Australia and New Zealand the “canaries” of China’s sharp power strategy. Business leaders there who were friendly to China took over Chinese-language news media, manipulated ethnic Chinese voters, funded research institutions that might otherwise ask probing questions about China, and lined the pockets of influential retired political leaders. This worked for a time, but as journalists like John Garnaut exposed China’s ill deeds, it sparked a backlash. Australia has stood firm under a torrent of Chinese threats and insults over the past few years, and New Zealand is quietly cutting out China’s infiltrations.

China’s sharp power offensive has been fiercer, and the backlash even stronger, in Taiwan. China is a latecomer to the disinformation game, but it experiments constantly on Taiwanese society. In one case, the shame from a deluge of false stories drove a Taiwanese official to commit suicide. Chinese propagandists tried to unseat President Tsai Ing-wen in the 2020 election, but popular anger at China’s heavy-handedness carried Tsai to a huge victory.

Although China has not made itself lovable, it is still exporting its model for controlling information. Kurlantzick shows that Chinese firms are taking an increasing share of the “pipes” through which information flows around the world: Huawei erects 5G internet and lays underseas internet cables, and StarTimes’s satellite TV coverage offers access to Chinese state media—and requires consumers to pay extra for Western media—in the developing world. Countries in the Global South are copying China’s model of a closed, tightly controlled internet, and many are backing China’s attempts to seize control of organizations, such as the International Telecommunications Union, that set global technology standards.

Since Xi Jinping’s disastrous mishandling of the COVID outbreak and self-defeating “wolf warrior” diplomacy has turned public opinion in much of the world against China, it would be tempting to downplay China’s attempts to manipulate media. This would be a mistake: China has successfully intimidated American news organizations and academics for decades, its propagandists learn from their mistakes, and its capabilities are growing.

Over the past few decades, acquiring and processing information has become an increasingly important part of economic activity, and it is not surprising that adversarial governments are increasingly interested in exploring other ways to gain power from information. Back in 2000, Bill Clinton blithely stated “there’s no question China has been trying to crack down on the Internet. Good luck! That’s sort of like trying to nail Jell-O to the wall.” Since then, China has demonstrated that hammering hard enough can make a lot of that Jell-O stick.

Beijing’s Global Media Offensive: China’s Uneven Campaign to Influence Asia and the World

by Joshua Kurlantzick

Oxford University Press, 560 pp., $29.95

Mike Watson is the associate director of Hudson Institute’s Center for the Future of Liberal Society.

The post The Middle Kingdom’s Media Blitz appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

California storm leaves over 560,000 homes without power, more rough weather ahead

2023-01-08T10:13:34Z

Capitola Wharf damaged by heavy storm waves is seen in Santa Cruz, California, U.S., January 5, 2023, in this screen grab obtained from a social media video. Kelly Pound/via REUTERS

Torrential downpours and damaging winds left hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses without power in California early on Sunday as the area braced for the next onslaught of severe weather.

More than 560,000 homes were reported to be still without power in California as of 0506 ET (1006 GMT), according to data from PowerOutage.us.

At least six people have died in the severe weather since New Year’s weekend, including a toddler killed by a fallen redwood tree crushing a mobile home in northern California.

Forecasters have meanwhile warned yet another “atmospheric river” of dense, moist tropical air will clobber California on Monday with rain and mountain snow.

An NWS weather alert on Saturday warned that the cumulative effect of successive heavy rain storms since late December could bring rivers to record high levels and cause flooding across much of Central California.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Security Affairs newsletter Round 401 by Pierluigi Paganini

newsletter.png?fit=645%2C446&ssl=1

A new round of the weekly SecurityAffairs newsletter arrived! Every week the best security articles from Security Affairs free for you in your email box.

If you want to also receive for free the newsletter with the international press subscribe here.

Chick-fil-A launched an investigation into “suspicious activity”
IcedID malware campaign targets Zoom users
Hive Ransomware gang leaked 550 GB stolen from Consulate Health Care
Saint Gheorghe Recovery Hospital in Romania suffered a ransomware attack
Microsoft details techniques of Mac ransomware
Rackspace: Play Ransomware gang used a previously unknown exploit to access its Hosted Exchange email environment
Bitdefender released a free decryptor for the MegaCortex ransomware
Threat actors stole Slack private source code repositories
How hackers might be exploiting ChatGPT
Zoho urges fixing a critical SQL Injection flaw in ManageEngine
Irish Data Protection Commission fined Meta $414 Million
Data of 235 million Twitter users leaked online
Critical flaws found in Ferrari, Mercedes, BMW, Porsche, and other carmakers
Database of the Cricketsocial.com platform left open online
Fortinet fixed multiple command injection bugs in FortiADC and FortiTester
New shc Linux Malware used to deploy CoinMiner
US. rail and locomotive company Wabtec hit with Lockbit ransomware
Synology fixes multiple critical vulnerabilities in its routers
Canadian Copper Mountain Mining Corporation (CMMC) shut down the mill after a ransomware attack
BitRAT campaign relies on stolen sensitive bank data as a lure
Does Volvo Cars suffer a new data breach?
Ransomware attacks hit 105 US local governments in 2022
SecurityAffairs Top 10 cybersecurity posts of 2022
PyTorch compromised to demonstrate dependency confusion attack on Python environments
Pro-Russia cyberattacks aim at destabilizing Poland, security agency warns
Google will pay $29.5M to settle two lawsuits over its location tracking practices
Lockbit apologized for the attack on the SickKids pediatric hospital and releases a free decryptor

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, newsletter)

The post Security Affairs newsletter Round 401 by Pierluigi Paganini appeared first on Security Affairs.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

These teachers think ChatGPT can help them spend less time on writing reports – and more time with their students

Teacher and Schoolgirl Exchanging High-Five in ClassroomTeachers may be able to use ChatGPT to save time grading papers and writing reports.

Getty Images

  • Schools fear students will use AI to cheat, but some teachers think it’s an asset for educators.
  • Tools such as ChatGPT could help teachers reduce the workload of grading and writing reports.
  • ChatGPT is “going to save teachers a lot of work,” said middle school director Zak Cohen.

Teachers are tired. They’re still dealing with the educational fallout after the pandemic shuttered many schools and they say they’re working long hours to help students catch up.

Zak Cohen, a middle school director based in Louisville, Kentucky, told Insider: “As a teacher, I am stretched thinner than I have ever been.”

However, he’s feeling positive about the future — partly because of tools such as artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT. “This is going to save teachers a lot of work,” he said.

He thinks ChatGPT could help teachers spend less time on tasks including grading papers, writing reports, and responding to emails, and spend more time actually teaching students.

He’s already advising his staff to use ChatGPT to streamline the process of compiling students’ annual reports by writing “templates” and using AI to fill in students’ names and notable achievements.

“My teachers have to write about 200 narrative reports every year,” said Cohen, which takes each one about 30 hours. 

He also thinks ChatGPT could help answer students’ questions and let help teachers “avoid getting bogged down in the infinite loop of late-night email exchanges.”

When it comes to grading — one of the most arduous yet dull tasks for teachers — AI promises “almost instantaneous feedback.” Cohen says this can help them better “understand which assignments are the most challenging” and quickly identify focus areas for further classwork. 

One day ChatGPT might even be able to handle “angry emails” from parents, he adds. 

Ultimately, Cohen told Insider, “ChatGPT has the potential to support teachers’ sanity and protect the sanctity of their time.”

Stephen Lockyer, who’s spent more than two decades as a primary teacher in the UK, echoes Cohen’s optimism.

In recent months, Locker told Insider he’s used a variety of AI tools to support his work.

He turned to controversial image-generator DALL-E, for example, to generate “enigmatic” learning aids. For a recent history class, he used the tool to create modern-day mugshots of King Henry VIII’s six wives.

He also shares Cohen’s hope that ChatGPT could cut out some of teachers’ boring backend work. “There’s an awful lot of paperwork involved in teaching,” Lockyer said. “I want to work as smart as possible, not as hard as possible.”

He recently used ChatGPT to generate lesson plans for a project on volcanoes. Lockyer thinks these plans, which took “less than a minute” to generate, would offer a “gigantic jumping-off point” that could eventually save hours of teachers’ time. 

—Stephen Lockyer (@mrlockyer) December 31, 2022

Lockyer also trialed the tool to automatically produce practical tasks and handouts for his students — including short questions about reading assignments designed to test comprehension.

Not everyone is as convinced about as Lockyer and Cohen, however. Some fear that the rise in artificial intelligence could make cheating easier — and New York City’s education department has already banned access to ChatGPT on all its networks and devices, Chalkbeat New York reported.

But Lockyer thinks educational leaders should “experiment a little bit” with ChatGPT to look for its positive potential. Used smartly, he thinks it could “get rid of the senseless grind” and allow teachers to spend more time with their students.

Read the original article on Business Insider
WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE