Categories
Saved Web Pages

Wanda Vázquez es arrestada por el FBI en su residencia

INJIG6QHTVBMHHJAZFJP7HWJXU.jpg

Wanda Vázquez Garced.Wanda Vázquez Garced. (Xavier Araújo Berríos)

El Negociado federal de Investigaciones (FBI, en inglés) arrestó esta madrugada a la exgobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced en su residencia, confirmaron varias fuentes de El Nuevo Día.

El arresto de Vázquez Garced se produce a poco más de dos meses desde que el grupo de abogados de la también ex secretaria de Justicia anticipó que podía ser acusada a nivel federal por supuesto fraude electoral.

Aunque no reveló nombre alguno, la portavoz de dicha agencia en Puerto Rico, Limary Cruz Rubio, indicó a este diario que son tres los arrestos por corrupción que se están ejecutando esta madrugada.

“No te puedo dar nombres de los acusados, ni te puedo hablar de específicos, porque todavía no hemos concluido los arrestos y esta acusación está sellada hasta que se efectúen los arrestos. De manera que, entonces, estoy limitada en lo que te puedo decir. Pero sí son tres órdenes de arresto por corrupción”, detalló la portavoz.

A las 11:00 a.m. se ofrecerá una conferencia de prensa en las oficinas de la Fiscalía Federal en Hato Rey.

Anteriormente, se había reportado que Vázquez Garced entregó su celular a las autoridades federales y, aunque no negó ni confirmó este dato, dijo, en aquel momento, que estaba dispuesta a colaborar con cualquier investigación.

La exmandataria, junto a sus abogados, habían anticipado una acusación federal el pasado 12 de mayo.

“Las investigaciones aquí nadie sabe por dónde van. Yo sí le puedo decir al pueblo de Puerto Rico que yo no he cometido ningún delito, que yo no he incurrido en ninguna conducta ilegal ni incorrecta”, afirmó, en ese momento, Vázquez Garced en entrevista con Telenoticias.

Mantente conectado a elnuevodia.com para la ampliación de esta historia.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Former Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vazquez under investigation for campaign financing corruption scheme

Former-Governor-Wanda-Vazquez-at-a-press

Wanda Vazquez, former governor of Puerto Rico, is currently being investigated for her involvement in illegal financing during her political campaign for governor in 2020. She is a member of the New Progressive Party which advocates for Puerto Rican statehood and is also affiliated with the Republican Party. There is suspicion that Vazquez accepted financial support from a foreign donor, Julio M. Herrera Velutini. 

Velutini is the president and owner of Bancrédito International Bank and Trust and is a Venezuelan national, which makes his donations illegal. These allegations are being taken seriously by the United States government as well as the people of Puerto Rico. The FBI is looking into this situation and investigating Vazquez as well as other members of her campaign, and they are likely to face criminal charges soon. 

Officials are also investigating Velutini. He allegedly left Venezuela in the midst of the Venezuelan government investigating him and issuing an arrest warrant for him. This warrant was issued due to his suspicious bank transactions. Velutini admitted to meeting with Vazquez in a professional setting where they discussed her aspirations to run in the gubernatorial elections in 2020, but he denied providing any financial support to her or her campaign. Both Vazquez and Velutini have continued to maintain this stance and are represented by their lawyers in the legal dispute. Vazquez was previously involved in a corruption scheme in July 2020 and was subject to an intense investigation. She was being accused of mismanaging resources and relief supplies for Puerto Ricans after they had suffered from an earthquake. When former Justice Secretary Dennise Longo brought up the case, she was fired. Vazquez has maintained her stance that Longo was not fired as a response to those actions, but rather that Vazquez asked her to resign due to her interference in a federal issue. 

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Former Governor Wanda Vazquez Is Arrested By The FBI At Her Residence

Former-Governor-Wanda-Vazquez-is-arreste

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI, in English) arrested the former governor this morning Wanda Vazquez Garcedo At his residence, multiple sources confirmed the new day,

Vazquez Garcid’s arrest comes just two months after he was indicted at the federal level for alleged election fraud by a group of lawyers for the former Justice Secretary.

Although she did not reveal any names, the agency’s spokeswoman in Puerto Rico, Limari Cruz Rubiotold this newspaper that three arrests were being made this morning on corruption charges.

“I can’t give you the names of the defendants, nor can I tell you specifically, because we haven’t concluded the arrests yet and this indictment is sealed until the arrests are made. So, what I can tell you. I am limited in that but yes Has three arrest warrants for corruption”, elaborated the spokesperson.

At 11:00 a press conference will be offered at the offices of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office in Hat Rei.

Previously, it was reported that Vázquez Garcid had handed over his cell phone to federal authorities and although he did not deny or confirm this information, he said at the time that he was ready to cooperate with any investigation. .

The former president, along with his lawyers, feared a federal charge on May 12.

“The investigation here no one knows where they are going. I can tell the people of Puerto Rico that I have not committed any crime, that I have not engaged in any illegal or wrongful conduct,” Vázquez Garcid said at the time in an interview with Telenoticias.

Stay tuned to elnuevodia.com to expand this story.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Alert: Official: Former Puerto Rico governor Wanda Vázquez arrested on corruption charges

opengraph_default.jpg

Aug. 4, 2022Updated: Aug. 4, 2022 4:37 a.m.

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — Official: Former Puerto Rico governor Wanda Vázquez arrested on corruption charges.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Patriarch Kirill is a pagan, “Russian World” is a heresy – europeantimes.news

Author: Epiphanius Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine

The idea of the “Russian World” is a heresy, and Moscow Patriarch Kirill has adopted a pagan and anti-Orthodox imperialist and nationalist ideology, which is why he must be condemned by the Orthodox world and removed from his post. This is what Epiphanius, Metropolitan of Kyiv and All Ukraine and Primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, called for in a letter to Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew dated July 28. (The full text of the letter – below here.)

The first reaction of Vakhtang Kipshidze, deputy spokesman of the Moscow Patriarchate, was that this appeal came from something that is not even a church, but a schismatic structure whose claims should not be taken seriously. (The Orthodox Church of Ukraine was established in December 2018, and a month later Patriarch Bartholomew gave it a tomos granting autocephaly. The Russian Orthodox Church did not recognize this decision – note ed.) The OCU is trying to please the Ukrainian authorities and participate in the campaign against the entire Russian people, including against the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, he added.

The Moscow Patriarch then said that the claim of “malicious people” that the Russian Orthodox Church exists only for Russians, for Muscovites, does not correspond to reality. The explanation was that it is in more than 60 countries around the world and for him the Orthodox, wherever they live, are part of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Cyril made the comment in the “Christ the Savior” church in Moscow at a meeting with children from Ukraine – from the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics and from Kharkiv Oblast. For him, this meeting was “a great joy”, “because everything affecting Donbas, Luhansk region, Kharkiv region – where people are suffering today – worries me a lot and hurts my heart, because all the Orthodox people who live there – these are children of the Moscow Patriarchate”.

After Vladimir Putin’s attack on Ukraine, the patriarch touched on the topic several times in his sermons. According to him, the peoples of Russia and Ukraine are one whole, which external forces tried to separate, and Russia has never attacked other countries, but “only defends its borders”.

Kirill has been sanctioned by Canada and Great Britain, and the intervention of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán prevented the European Union from doing the same at Lithuania’s proposal.

Here is the letter that the Ukrainian Metropolitan sent to Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew.

Your Holiness,

In accordance with the decision of the Council of Bishops of May 24 of this year I call on you to initiate examination and condemnation on a pan-Orthodox level of the activities of the Moscow Patriarch Kirill Gundyaev and the ethnophyletic and racist doctrine of the “Russian World” preached by him.

On February 24, 2022, the Russian Federation insidiously, without an official declaration of war, launched a full-scale military aggression against Ukraine. The war launched by Russia in the center of Europe as early as February 2014 is being waged with the aim of destroying Ukrainian statehood and striking with extreme cruelty. A true genocide is being committed against the Ukrainian people before the eyes of the whole world. The aggressor is destroying peaceful Ukrainian cities, shelling hospitals and schools, raping and torturing women and minors, killing and maiming children. Among those killed by the Russian troops are the clergy of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, religious teachers from other faiths. About 200 religious buildings, mostly Orthodox churches, were completely or partially destroyed as a result of the Russian shelling.

Russia is a country that has linked its identity with Orthodoxy for centuries. But in recent decades, the Christian faith in Russia has been subjected to paganism – insidiously replaced by a civil religion that rests on the Orthodox tradition, but is alien to the spirit of the Gospel and the content of the Orthodox faith of the Holy Fathers. Many Russian soldiers who invaded our country identify with Orthodoxy. But the deeds done by the invaders testify to them as criminals who have lost their living connection with Christ and His Church.

Each murdered child, each raped woman, each destroyed residential building and temple is not only a war crime, but also an act of denying Christ, as a result of which the criminal finds himself outside the fertile fence of the Church. But the moral responsibility for the committed crimes is borne not only by the direct perpetrators, but also by their ideological inspirers – Moscow Patriarch Kirill and like-minded hierarchs, who for decades propagated, and now blessed, the ethnophyletic and racist doctrine of the “Russian World”.

Many of the elections for the patriarchal chair of Metropolitan Kirill (2009) connect certain hopes for the revival of church life. But today, when twelve and a half years have passed since Cyril occupied the Moscow see, it is obvious that the announced reforms did not take place and the only real achievements of the 16th Moscow patriarch were the concentration of power in the hands of one man with a complete degradation of the real church council and complete dependence of the Church on the Russian state.

Metropolitan, and later Patriarch Kirill, was never a standard for professing the Orthodox faith. Some theological statements of Bishop Cyril – for example, the identification of the Third Hypostasis of the Holy Trinity with the “Divine energy eternally originating from God the Father” – even caused controversy and temptations among the clergy of the Russian Church. Cyril’s almost complete indifference to theological problems kept him from completely falling into the realm of heresy. The situation changed when the hierarch, whose attention had long been focused on geopolitical problems, decided to participate in the creation of the doctrine of the “Russian World” – a nationalist ethnophyletic theory of the special role of the Russian nation and state in the world and in the Church.

On Orthodox Sunday, March 15 this year, the Declaration on the “Russian World” was promulgated, which was initially signed by more than 340 Orthodox theologians from around the world, whose number has now increased to a thousand. As noted in this Declaration, the “Russian World” is an unorthodox heretical doctrine, close to the teaching of ethnophiletism, condemned at the Council of Constantinople in 1872. “We reject the heresy of the “Russian World” and the shameful actions of the Russian authorities in allowing the war against Ukraine, caused by this vile doctrine, which has no justification – for the complicity of the Russian Orthodox Church, as actions deeply non-Orthodox, non-Christian,” noted the Orthodox theologians who signed the Declaration. Similar assessments were expressed in another public document – Open Address to the Heads of the Orthodox Churches.

While sharing most of the statements contained in the above Appeals, we also wish to draw Your Holiness’ attention to another heretical aspect of the “Russian World” doctrine that significantly distorts Orthodox anthropology. It is about denying the rights of peoples to historical self-determination or historical fatalism inherent in the doctrine of the “Russian world” in the interpretation of Patriarch Kirill. According to the latter’s mythological historical concept, Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians supposedly belong to the common civilization of the “Russian World” and as such have no moral right to further historical self-determination. Their choice, made in the past, supposedly obligates them to be a part of the Russian world or the Russian state for the rest of their lives.

The denial of the freedom of entire peoples is combined in the worldview of Patriarch Kirill and his like-minded people with a racist theory in spirit, according to which Russia and the “Russian world” are something fundamentally better and higher than other nations, and Russia’s historical neighbors – Ukrainians and Belarusians – have the right to exist and have a future only as part of the Russian reality. Within this racist concept, which divides peoples and states into “real” and “artificial”, it is also quite logical in principle to deny the right of the people of Ukraine to full canonical church independence (autocephaly) and statehood.

At the same time, it is important to understand that the ideology of the modern Russian Orthodox Church poses a threat not only to Ukraine, but also to the entire Orthodox world. “Just as Russia invaded Ukraine, so the Moscow Patriarchate, headed by Patriarch Kirill, became an invader in the Orthodox Church, for example in Africa, causing division and discord,” noted the Orthodox theologians in the aforementioned Declaration.

It is important to realize the connection between the doctrine of the “Russian World” and the specific church decisions initiated by Patriarch Kirill in recent years – from the severance of Eucharistic communion with the Ecumenical Patriarchate (October 15, 2018) to the creation of the “Patriarchal Exarchy of Africa” . Armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine (2022). At least since October 2018, all actions of Patriarch Kirill have been subordinated to a specific political goal. He seeks to radically increase the presence of the Russian Orthodox Church outside of Russia, to weaken the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Greek-speaking local churches as much as possible, and thus impose on the Orthodox world the hegemony and dictates of the Moscow Patriarch.

In the current situation, it is extremely important that the Catholic Church responds properly to the challenges arising from pagan Russian Orthodoxy. As the Gospel testifies, “every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit” (Matthew 7:18). Acting according to this principle commanded by our Savior, the Church must collectively recognize that the tree that today bears the “fruits of war” is poisonous, that is, condemn the doctrine of the “Russian world” as heretical.

We call on Your Holiness and the Superiors of the Local Orthodox Churches to also look into the activities of Patriarch Cyril as soon as possible, related to his opposition to the Ecumenical Patriarchate and many Local Orthodox Churches, and if this activity is recognized as containing signs of schism, to bring the Patriarch to justice to canonical responsibility.

In view of the above, we ask Your Holiness and His Beatitude the Heads of the Local Orthodox Churches to canonically qualify several decisions of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church, adopted in 2018 – 2021, which, in our opinion, do not correspond to the principles of Orthodox ecclesiology:

• a decision to interrupt (unilaterally) the Eucharistic communion with the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the Patriarchate of Alexandria, the Church of Cyprus and the Church of Greece;

• the decision to create – contrary to the canonical tradition and the sixth rule of the First Ecumenical Council – the church structures of the Moscow Patriarchate on the canonical territory of the ancient Patriarchate of Alexandria.

On behalf of the bishops of our Church and the numerous victims of Russia’s war against Ukraine, which the Patriarch of Moscow openly and unequivocally publicly approves and supports, we appeal to Your Holiness and the Heads of the Local Orthodox Churches with a request:

• to condemn the doctrine of the “Russian World” and recognize it as heretical;

• to qualify the actions of Patriarch Kirill in the canonical territory of the Patriarchate of Alexandria as schismatic;

• to deprive Kiril Gundyaev of the right to occupy the Moscow Patriarchate.

With sincere brotherly love in Christ, we ask Your Holiness and His Beatitude the Heads of the Local Orthodox Churches to continue offering their prayers for the suffering people of Ukraine and to grant the request expressed in this letter – objectively, in accordance with the teachings and sacred canons of the Church, to examine the activities of the current heads of the Russian Church.

On behalf of the Synod of Bishops of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine

Epiphanius

Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine

Primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine

Photo: Metropolitan Epiphany during the service in Istanbul in January 2019 at the recognition of a Ukrainian church that is not subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate © president.gov.ua

Categories
Saved Web Pages

ID Theft, Fraud, Prison: The Wild Life of a Bishop Robbed at the Pulpit

00nyc-bishop10-facebookJumbo.jpg

Bishop Lamor Whitehead, who was robbed during a service at his church, returned on Sunday to deliver a sermon.

Bishop Lamor Whitehead, who was robbed during a service at his church, returned on Sunday to deliver a sermon.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

The police said Bishop Lamor Whitehead was robbed of a fortune in jewelry, the crime caught on camera. But the focus soon turned to him and his past run-ins with the law.

Bishop Lamor Whitehead, who was robbed during a service at his church, returned on Sunday to deliver a sermon.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

Michael Wilson
  • Aug. 4, 2022, 5:00 a.m. ET

Inside his makeshift church in Brooklyn, seated in a chair that looked more like a throne and dressed in a slim-cut, banana-yellow suit by Gucci, Bishop Lamor Whitehead prepared to deliver the sermon his followers had been waiting a long week to hear.

It had been seven days since the obscure little congregation, Leaders of Tomorrow International Ministries, was robbed by three armed and masked men during a service on July 24, the heist caught on a livestream video. The robbers relieved Bishop Whitehead and his wife of many chains, rings, watches and other jewelry — the total value of which is in dispute, but is estimated to be as high as $1 million — and escaped outside on Remsen Avenue.

Bishop Whitehead rose.

“The devil didn’t want me back in this pulpit,” he said solemnly. “God said, ‘You can’t take his life. You can touch his material things. But you can’t touch his soul.’”

Then he re-enacted the robbery. Twice.

ImageBishop Whitehead re-enacted the robbery during his service on Sunday.

Bishop Whitehead re-enacted the robbery during his service on Sunday.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

In the wake of the brazen heist, attention has focused on Bishop Whitehead, a friend of Mayor Eric Adams with a felony identity theft conviction in his past. Why, some wondered, would a preacher with a tiny congregation have a small fortune in jewelry on his person? And his immediate reaction during the robbery, as if practiced, has led to questions about whether he knew the robbers were coming — a suggestion he dismissed as ludicrous.

“It’s being said because people can’t believe that this happened,” he said. Asked about whether the jewelry was insured, he dismissed the question as “legal.”

The robbery was just the beginning of a very bad week for Bishop Whitehead. When two pastors from Atlanta, speaking on the livestream talk show “Larry Reid Live,” laughed at his church’s slapdash design, he joined the show as it was in progress and flew into a rage, mocking a female pastor’s weight and using an anti-gay slur.

At the same time, troubles from his past were coming to the surface, including the time he spent in prison and the lawsuits he faced in New York accusing him of walking off with large amounts of money from people he knew. Court records from New Jersey show that Bishop Whitehead owes more than $400,000 in judgments to a construction company that built his house and the credit union that financed his Mercedes-Benz and Range Rover — revelations that he has dismissed as victim-shaming, even racist.

In the wake of the robbery, Bishop Whitehead faced questions about his history and his flashy style, but the congregation at his church expressed support.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times
The bishop’s congregation meets in a humble space above a Haitian restaurant in Brooklyn.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times
Bishop Whitehead held a news conference outside the church last week, but declined to answer questions about his own legal history.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

“I’m a miracle — I’m not supposed to be here today,” he said from the altar on Sunday. “Everybody wants to talk about what the tabloids are talking about and forget about the miracle.”

In interviews, Bishop Whitehead simultaneously declined to discuss his past legal troubles and invited renewed scrutiny. “The reason people can’t figure me out is because they’re trying to figure me out the wrong way,” he said. “What you see is what you’ll get.”

In Brooklyn, Bishop Whitehead’s roots run deep.

On the night of June 14, 1978, police officers stopped a motorist for having a suspended license. He protested, a table of fruit was overturned and as more officers arrived, a big man with a gun on his hip approached. His name was Arthur Miller, the driver’s brother and a respected businessman in the neighborhood, leading job fairs and founding community groups.

Mr. Miller had been trying to defuse the situation, but the officers zeroed in on the gun — legally owned and licensed. One put Mr. Miller in a chokehold. He collapsed, according to news accounts at the time, foaming at the mouth when officers loaded him into a squad car. His legs were sticking out a window when it pulled away, and he was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital. His death led to protests and a march to City Hall.

Mr. Miller left several children. The youngest, with his mother’s last name, was a baby: Lamor Miller Whitehead.

“Growing up as a young man on the mean streets of Brooklyn was not easy,” the bishop would write on his church’s website years later. “Being raised in a single-parent home, without a father, and expected to survive in a world that was designed for him to fail in.”

He did not fail. He attended Eastern New Mexico University, where he studied accounting and videography, and returned to Brooklyn, where he went to work as a mortgage broker in Manhattan.

But soon after, Mr. Whitehead would set his life on a much different course.

In 2005, a woman called the Suffolk County Police Department and said someone had bought a motorcycle in Brooklyn in her name, using all her personal information.

A few days later, an officer pulled over a man driving the same motorcycle at a traffic stop. The driver was 27-year-old Lamor Whitehead.

What followed was a lengthy investigation that uncovered what the police described as a sprawling identity theft and fraud operation set up and run by one person: Mr. Whitehead, whose girlfriend had access to customers’ credit reports through her job at a Long Island car dealership.

Using personal data he pulled from her computer — she kept her login information on a piece of paper at home — Mr. Whitehead stole the identities of at least a dozen people. He took out loans in their names and bought cars and motorcycles, according to his indictment in Suffolk County in 2006.

“He was living the high life,” a Suffolk County detective said at the time.

Preparation for a trial took months. In the interim, rather than lay low and work on his case, Mr. Whitehead pulled off more frauds, court records indicate.

He was still working as a mortgage broker out of an office in the Empire State Building around 2005, when a symphony conductor named Maximo Bragado-Darman and his son, Julio Bragado-Young, entered his office and hired him to help them close on a brownstone in Harlem. The deal was completed.

Later, Mr. Whitehead reached out to the elder client privately with a business proposal. If you loan me $200,000, Mr. Whitehead explained, I can pay you back in a month, along with an extra $25,000, according to a lawsuit that followed.

The conductor, trusting the young man who had smoothly executed the Harlem deal, took out a line of credit on his home, gave him the money and kept it a secret from his family, planning on surprising them with good news when the windfall came in, his son said.

Instead, he was forced to share bad news: Mr. Whitehead was not going to pay him back.

“It was almost guaranteed he was going to make money on this,” Mr. Bragado-Young said, referring to his father. Of Mr. Whitehead, he said: “He’s a disgusting human being. You can quote me on that.”

For Mr. Whitehead, a steady four-year run of fraud came crashing down. He filed for bankruptcy in 2006, citing as income the $10,000 a month he was earning as a mortgage broker.

The real hammer came down in 2008 — Mr. Whitehead’s trial date had finally arrived for the identity theft charges. Prosecutors spent several days laying out their case, linking Mr. Whitehead to the crimes through phone records and the evidence found in his house and car. He was convicted of 17 counts, mostly identity theft, and sentenced to 10 to 30 years in prison.

When a lawsuit brought by the symphony conductor was filed that fall, Mr. Whitehead was served his copy in Sing Sing Correctional Facility. The lawsuit led to a judgment for the conductor of $306,000.

Five years later, in July 2013, Mr. Whitehead was released with a glowing behavioral record. And as soon as weeks later, the Leaders of Tomorrow Ministries was born, “with the support of 43 people who believed and met in his home for Bible study,” according to his biography online.

“I have a calling and I had to do what I had to do,” he said in an interview this week. “As soon as I came home, it was on.”

Services on Sunday were sparsely attended.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

Mr. Whitehead became Bishop Whitehead, and he has proved himself to be a gripping orator with what appears to be a deep knowledge of his worn Bible and an ability to summon chapter and verse with ease. He can place his audience in a state of rapt silence one moment and loud singing and clapping the next.

“The bishop’s very relatable,” said Chantelle Vickers, 38, a member of the church and a pastor-elect. “He’s from the streets of Brooklyn. He’s not like other pastors.”

She heard the widespread criticism of all the jewelry the “bling bishop” was wearing when he was robbed. “Rappers, singers, the way they attract people, that’s what he’s doing,” she said. “People want to know how you got all that. Once you get here, you see he is teaching God.”

This philosophy, broadly known as the prosperity gospel, arose within African American religious traditions and emphasized the material benefits of maintaining a relationship with God, said the Rev. Dr. David Latimore, director of the Betsey Stockton Center for Black Church Studies at Princeton Theological Seminary.

It’s natural that someone preaching that God provides material wealth would himself bear evidence of that, he said. And yet, to him, Bishop Whitehead’s abundance seemed excessive. “While this is not the only example of displays of affluence within churches as a part of this approach to preaching, I want to argue that this is an extreme example,” he said.

At the end of his lengthy sermons, Bishop Whitehead picks up a stack of empty envelopes and invites worshipers to “sow” with donations, starting at $1,000 or $500. When there are no takers, the suggested amounts decline. At a recent service, the first envelopes left his hand when he arrived at $150. It’s unclear, of course, how much a person actually places in the envelope.

With only 25 or so people at services on Sunday, attendance was lower than normal — understandable a week after an armed robbery. But even with a crowd twice that size, it seems unlikely that donations would be high enough to pay for a fraction of the jewelry that was stolen.

Bishop Whitehead appears to have a deep knowledge of scripture, summoning chapter and verse with ease. Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times
Espousing what is known as the prosperity gospel, Bishop Whitehead preaches that God will provide abundance for those who give to the church.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times
Members of the bishop’s church have defended him against criticism, and said his flashy style helps bring people to the congregation.Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

He has said he does not make money in his role as bishop, and it is unclear how he earns a living. But court filings suggest it does not seem to be working very well.

In 2019, Bishop Whitehead stopped making his monthly payments on a Mercedes-Benz and a Range Rover in New Jersey, according to a lawsuit that ended with a $68,000 judgment against him.

That same year, he wrote a $164,000 check to the company that built his home in Paramus, N.J. It bounced, according to a lawsuit.

In 2020, when a woman who had recently visited the church was recovering from surgery, Bishop Whitehead offered to help her buy a new home. The woman, Pauline Anderson, sent him $90,000 that she had withdrawn from her retirement account, according to a lawsuit.

“I am a man of integrity and you will not lose,” he texted her. She asked for her money back, but he said it was too late — it had already been invested.

At the same time, according to the lawsuit, Bishop Whitehead was in contract to buy a palatial, $4.4 million house in Saddle River, N.J., with a pool, a gym and a wine cellar.

In church on Sunday, Bishop Whitehead dismissed Ms. Anderson from the pulpit as a liar: “That’s what the enemy wants you to believe.”

Later, when asked about his income streams in an interview, Bishop Whitehead was vague. “I’m in real estate investment and a pastor,” he said. “I don’t like digging into all that other stuff.”

He continued: “Everybody sues people, from here on out. It is what it is,” he said. “My church was robbed. I was robbed. I’m the victim.”

His lawyer, Brenden Kombol, said he met Bishop Whitehead a few months ago, and only learned of the ongoing litigation in the press last week.

He offered one nugget of information regarding the stolen jewelry: “I’ve been told that they were at least partially insured,” he said.

Mayor Adams has long called the bishop a friend. “The bishop lost his dad — Arthur Miller was his name — during a police incident,” he said last week. “I have always maintained relationships with people who have gone through traumatic experiences.” At the same time, he rejected the bishop’s call that preachers be armed in church.

The robbery remains under investigation. Whatever its outcome, one thing is certain, as Bishop Whitehead told his flock on Sunday morning.

“Now the world knows our name,” he said. “It don’t get no bigger than that.”

Hurubie Meko, Tracey Tully and Michael Rothfeld contributed reporting. Susan C. Beachy and Kirsten Noyes contributed research.

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE