Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

George Santos gets two committee assignments

The House GOP Steering Committee on Tuesday recommended that embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) sit on the House Small Business Committee and House Science, Space and Technology Committee, according to sources familiar with the assignments.

Santos’s assignment to the panels comes after multiple members of his own party have called on him to resign over his admitted fabrications about his work history and education, questions about his campaign finances, misleading claims of Jewish heritage and reported charges in Brazil related to checkbook fraud (which Santos has denied), among other issues.

The recommendation from the House GOP Steering Committee, a panel of around 30 members of House leadership and elected regional representatives, will have to be approved by the full House Republican Conference. The conference typically approves the steering panel’s recommendation.

Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas) is the newly-assigned chairman of the Small Business Committee, which has jurisdiction over the Small Business Administration and implemented the Paycheck Protection Program loan program authorized in response to COVID-19.  

“I don’t condone what he said, what he’s done. I don’t think anybody does. But that’s not my role. He was elected. He represents a million people,” Williams said of Santos on Tuesday, CNN reported.

Rep. Frank Lucas (R-Okla.) is chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, which has jurisdiction over energy, astronautical, marine and other research areas, as well as agencies like the National Weather Service.

A spokesperson for the panel declined comment.

Before his resume fabrications were revealed, Santos told NY1 in November that he hoped to sit on the House Financial Services Committee, “based on my 14-year background in capital markets,” and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, “based on my, I guess, multicultural background as a human being.”

“I think those would be natural fits, and those are also where my passions lie,” Santos said at the time.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has declined to call on Santos to resign, and said the freshman lawmaker would sit on committees.

“I try to stick by the Constitution. The voters elected him to serve. If there is a concern, and he has to go through the Ethics, let him move through that,” McCarthy told reporters last week, referring to the House Ethics Committee.

“He is going to have to build the trust here, and he’s going to have the opportunity to try to do that,” McCarthy said.

Santos is under investigation in New York, but has not been charged with any crime in the U.S. Lawmakers in the past have continued to serve in Congress and on committees until they were found guilty of a crime.

Updated at 6:26 p.m.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Ukraine closer to receiving modern Western battle tanks, more Patriots

2023-01-18T00:53:47Z

Ukraine has taken a step closer to winning approval for German-made modern battle tanks to confront invading Russian forces and has secured a pledge of more Patriot defence missiles as its allies appear ready to rally for the next phase of the war.

Ukraine has relied primarily on Soviet-era T-72 tank variants. Germany’s Leopard 2 tank, operated by armies in about 20 countries, is regarded as one of the West’s best. The tank weighs more than 60 tons, has a 120mm smoothbore gun and can hit targets at a distance of up to five km.

Ukraine says the tanks would give its troops the mobile firepower to drive Russian troops out in decisive battles. Germany has been the West’s biggest holdout on pledging tanks but a Cabinet minister said on Tuesday the issue would be the first to be decided by new defence minister Boris Pistorius.

He will host U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Thursday ahead of a meeting on Friday of dozens of defence ministers at Ramstein air base in Germany.

Western countries have provided a steady supply of weapons to Ukraine since Russia invaded last Feb. 24 in what it calls a “special military operation” to protect its security because its neighbour grew increasingly close to the West.

Ukraine and its allies accuse Moscow of an unprovoked war to grab territory and to erase the independence of a fellow ex-Soviet republic.

The allies must intensify their military support to Ukraine to help them break a hardening of the front lines and avoid a prolonged battle of attrition, Britain’s foreign minister, James Cleverly, said on a visit to Washington on Tuesday.

“What we see when you have these kind of brutal, attritional conflicts is this huge loss of life. And that cannot be what any of us want to see – which is why we think that now is the right time to intensify our support for Ukraine,” Cleverly told a small group of reporters.

Also in Washington, Prime Minister Mark Rutte of the Netherlands told U.S. President Joe Biden of Dutch plans to offer the U.S.-made Patriot missile defence system to Ukraine, working together with Germany amid a barrage of missile attacks from Russia.

Last month, Washington announced additional military aid for Ukraine, including the transfer of a Patriot system, considered one of the most advanced U.S. air defence systems that offers protection against aircraft, cruise and ballistic missiles.

The civilian death toll from a missile that struck an apartment block in the central city of Dnipro on Saturday rose to 45, including six children, among them an 11-month-old boy, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said in his Tuesday night video address.

“It is now merely a matter of time before we drive the occupants from our land, before justice returns, and before the sentences for Russian murderers are announced,” Zelenskiy said.

Ukrainian authorities called off the search for survivors in Dnipro on Tuesday.

Zelenskiy is to speak on Wednesday to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Meanwhile, the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Tuesday evening said Ukrainian and Russian forces exchanged fire on the eastern frontline, where neither side has advanced much in recent months.

Russian forces launched four missile strikes, including two on civilian targets in the city of Kramatorsk in Donetsk region, west of the two focal points of fighting, the towns of Bakhmut and Avdiivka, the military’s report said.

Russian forces also launched 13 air raids and 23 shelling attacks from multiple rocket launchers, it said.

Reuters was not able to verify battlefield reports.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is due to visit St Petersburg on Wednesday, the 80th anniversary of the day Soviet forces managed to open a narrow land corridor to the city – then known as Leningrad – and break a Nazi blockade that had lasted since September 1941.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told a domestic news agency that there was no truth to rumours Putin would announce changes to the war effort such as a general mobilisation.

Related Galleries:

Ukrainian servicemen prepare a Polish self-propelled howitzer Krab to fire toward Russian positions, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, on a frontline in Donetsk region, Ukraine January 17, 2023. REUTERS/Oleksandr Ratushniak

Ukrainian servicemen fire a Polish self-propelled howitzer Krab toward Russian positions, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, on a frontline in Donetsk region, Ukraine January 17, 2023. REUTERS/Oleksandr Ratushniak

Emergency personnel work at the site where an apartment block was heavily damaged by a Russian missile strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Dnipro, Ukraine January 16, 2023. REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne

Emergency personnel work among debris at the site where a building was heavily damaged in recent shelling in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in Donetsk, Russian-controlled Ukraine, January 16, 2023. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko

A view of the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant, amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, near Yuzhnoukrainsk, Ukraine January 16, 2023. REUTERS/Nacho Doce
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Republican state officials question proxy advisers ISS, Glass Lewis over ESG

2023-01-18T00:24:54Z

Republican attorneys general from 21 U.S. states on Tuesday wrote to proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, asking whether the companies’ voting recommendations on such issues as climate and boardroom diversity violated duties to clients.

“Evidence regarding climate change advocacy and goals suggests potential violations of your contractual obligations and legal duties,” the attorneys from states including Texas and Utah said in their letter.

They asked both firms by the end of January to answer questions such as how they determined “appropriate” emissions targets.

Neither ISS nor Glass Lewis immediately commented. Both firms have faced criticism in the past for the widely followed recommendations they offer investors on how to cast ballots at corporate annual meetings.

But their recommendations remain popular among investors.

Traditionally, most of the criticism has come from corporate executives.

But, as with Tuesday’s letter, Republicans have stepped up their criticism of firms that incorporate environmental, social or governance (ESG) goals into their business. Republican critics argue the companies should focus more on investment returns.

At the same time, companies and top asset management firms face pressure from various Democratic state officials to pay more attention to such issues as climate change and workforce diversity, which have also drawn growing interest from investors.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the ESG efforts of BlackRock Inc (BLK.N), the world’s biggest asset manager, saying the focus could impact investor returns.

BlackRock Chief Executive Larry Fink said on Tuesday his company had lost around $4 billion in assets under management as a result of a political backlash against ESG investing in the United States. read more

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

How Europe can help Ukraine defeat Russia and win the peace in 2023

Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has thrust the country to the very top of Europe’s strategic agenda. At the same time, Ukrainian membership of both the European Union and NATO remain distant goals. It is therefore vital for the European community to explore other opportunities to strengthen support for Ukraine in 2023. These efforts should involve a combination of intensification and innovation.

One of the simplest and quickest ways of increasing support for Ukraine is through the utilization of already operational treaties, programs, and formats that make it possible to enhance the country’s resilience. These include the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which goes beyond any of the agreements signed with Central and Eastern European countries in the 1990s.

Intensification of cooperation within the framework of the Association Agreement will further Ukraine’s EU integration in line with the summer 2022 decision to award the country official EU candidate status. It also presents a number of comparatively uncomplicated opportunities to help Ukraine deal with the immediate issues created by ongoing Russian aggression.

Deepening cooperation with NATO within existing partnership frameworks such as the Enhanced Opportunity Program (EOP) and the NATO-Ukraine Commission is also possible. Meanwhile, the Ukraine Defense Consultative Group, which is informally known as the Ramstein Format, makes it relatively easy to increase weapons supplies to Ukraine and speed up the defeat of Vladimir Putin’s invasion. The most urgent objective in this regard is the delivery of Leopard tanks.

Subscribe to UkraineAlert

As the world watches the Russian invasion of Ukraine unfold, UkraineAlert delivers the best Atlantic Council expert insight and analysis on Ukraine twice a week directly to your inbox.

2015-08-20T120000Z_1614809784_GF10000177

  • Name

    First

    Last

  • Email*
  • Phone
    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Some existing programs and policies require significant modification in order to account for the dramatically deteriorating circumstances in Ukraine as the full-scale Russian invasion of the country approaches the one-year mark. One obvious step would be the extension and hardening of current Western sanctions against Russia. This intensification of the sanctions regime could seek to widen the circle of targeted state actors and private individuals within Russia while also aiming to impose sanctions measures on a wider range of non-Russian companies that provide Moscow with services and technologies critical to the war effort.

The European Union could look to adopt and introduce a staged EU accession procedure for Ukraine in the coming months that would build on last summer’s confirmation of candidate status. This would involve Ukraine’s gradual inclusion into various sub-unions, governing organs, regulatory frameworks, branch agreements, and special EU programs ahead of full membership.

A resolute intensification and modification of the West’s existing Ukraine-related programs and policies would go a long way to meeting some of Kyiv’s most immediate needs. However, Ukraine’s extraordinary current circumstances and their consequences for the whole European project, as well as the institutional and doctrinal inertia of existing programs, mean that mere acceleration and adaptation will be insufficient. Entirely new tools will be required to bring about a rapid and qualitative change in Kyiv’s ability to win the current war and the subsequent peace.

Innovation will be essential in 2023 in order to provide the support necessary to defeat Putin and prepare the ground for the massive national reconstruction project that lies ahead. A number of novel approaches have already become hot topics on the international agenda. Top of the list is the need for a multilateral reconstruction initiative for Ukraine, which most observers are framing as a successor to the Marshall Plan in post-World War II Europe.

There is currently no consensus of the exact makeup of a possible future Marshall Plan for Ukraine. However, there is a general sense that the EU would play a leading role together with the UN, the world’s leading international financial institutions, national development agencies, individual partner governments, and private investors.

Some policymakers and observers favor the establishment of a reconstruction or coordination center which would function under the joint auspices of the G7 nations and Kyiv. This could serve as an attuning, auditing, and clearing mechanism for multilateral, national, and non-governmental actors in order to harmonize their support for Ukraine under a common roof.

The international community should also look to establish a political risk insurance scheme to help Ukraine attract the foreign direct investment the country will desperately need in the coming years. The EU and international financial institutions could create a framework that will protect investors from war-related risk in order create the right conditions for an economic revival.

Talk of rebuilding Ukraine is still premature, of course. First, Russia’s attempt to take over or destroy the country must be decisively defeated. To achieve this goal, Ukraine needs significantly enhanced weapons supplies from the country’s international partners.

Once active hostilities come to an end, Europe should take the lead in the establishment of a new type of collective security guarantee for Ukraine involving a coalition of willing states. Unless Ukrainian security is guaranteed by a powerful coalition, there will be no sustainable peace in Europe. 

Providing Ukraine with the support necessary to defeat Russia and win the peace will require both political will and political skill. This will be neither cheap nor easy. Indeed, European leaders must be prepared to invest considerable political capital if they wish to stop Putin and prevent a far larger war in the coming years. Some will inevitably be reluctant to accept such costs, but failure to do so would have disastrous consequences for Europe and the wider world.

Dr. Andreas Umland is an analyst at the Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies (SCEEUS) of the Swedish Institute of International Relations (UI). He recently authored the SCEEUS report: ”How the West Can Help Ukraine: Three Strategies for Achieving a Ukrainian Victory and Rebirth.”

Further reading

The views expressed in UkraineAlert are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Atlantic Council, its staff, or its supporters.

The Eurasia Center’s mission is to enhance transatlantic cooperation in promoting stability, democratic values and prosperity in Eurasia, from Eastern Europe and Turkey in the West to the Caucasus, Russia and Central Asia in the East.

Follow us on social media
and support our work

The post How Europe can help Ukraine defeat Russia and win the peace in 2023 appeared first on Atlantic Council.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Analysis: White House strategy for classified records lacking

(NewsNation) — The White House continued to deal with fallout from the discovery of classified documents at the home of President Joe Biden and was peppered with questions again Tuesday.

Press secretary Kareen Jean-Pierre repeatedly refused to answer those questions during a press briefing, citing the ongoing investigation. The Justice Department is probing the matter.

Bob Cusack, editor-in-chief of The Hill, says the White House needs to figure out a strategy for dealing with the fallout.

“It’s certainly overshadowing a very good midterm election for him,” Cusack said Tuesday on “Rush Hour.” “I think President Biden and the White House need to get on top of this, make sure there aren’t more documents and then have a strategy of how to deal with this, and that could be awhile.”

You can watch his interview above.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Why Netflix’s Cancellation of Warrior Nun Sparked Widespread Protests Online

In mid-December, Netflix quietly canceled Warrior Nun, a fantasy drama series with a cult following. Based on Benn Dunn’s comic book character Warrior Nun Areala from 1993, the show follows Ava Silva (Alba Baptista) after she wakes up in a morgue with a divine artifact embedded in her back, suddenly part of an ancient order charged with fighting demons.

“I’ve just found out that @netflix will not be renewing #WarriorNun,” tweeted showrunner Simon Barry after the news came out. “My sincere appreciation to all the fans who worked so hard to bring awareness to this series, and for the love you showed me, the cast and the whole production team. It was a privilege to be a part of this.”

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

The cancellation came just a month after the release of Warrior Nun’s second season, which spent three weeks in Netflix’s Global Top 10 TV shows. The series is one of a growing number of original shows the streamer has scrapped early in its run (and fans would argue prematurely)—Decider counts 92 canceled original shows. The entertainment industry has been abuzz in recent months with news about scrapped shows. Much of that attention has been directed at HBO Max, which recently dumped a number of shows in addition to deciding not to air several that had already finished filming.

Read more: Why Your Favorite Show Is Leaving HBO Max

How fans have responded

Warrior Nun’s dedicated fan base—which refers to itself as Nunkind or Halo Bearers—has been rallying around the show for the past month. On Tuesday morning, the phrase “Netflix, correct your mistake” was trending worldwide on Twitter in reference to the cancellation.

#SaveWarriorNun also trended immediately following the news (it has been tweeted more than five million times), as did #CancelNetflix, as fans shared screenshots of their own cancellation confirmations. To date, more than 107,000 people have signed an online petition to renew the show for a third season.

Their pleas have been creative, to say the least. One fan posted a selfie with a #SaveWarriorNun sign while paragliding. Another shared a selfie holding the hashtag while scuba diving. A third organized a poetry open mic night for the cause. And singer-songwriter Ames—whose single Hymn For Her was featured in the second episode of the show—released an instrumental version of the track “for all #nunkind.”

HOW. They can’t just live us hanging like that. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU @nettlix ? Justife for #warriornun https://t.co/oLfTNXovSX

— Nicole Polizzi (@snooki) December 13, 2022

The second season scored 100% from critics and 99% from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, a record-setting high for a Netflix original series. It also landed in the New York Times’ “50 Best TV Shows on Netflix Right Now” and the Washington Post’s “10 Hidden TV Gems You May Have Missed”—all with “$0 spent on promotion,” according to the showrunner.

While Netflix hasn’t clarified why it chose not to renew the series, it’s possible, even likely, that the reason comes down to basic math: perhaps simply not enough eyeballs were on the show, despite the ardent devotion of those fans who did watch. (The second season’s release was sandwiched between two highly-watched shows: Manifest and Wednesday.) Unlike with, say, a canceled network show, Netflix controls what data it chooses to release, so it can be harder to parse the logic behind these decisions.

Canceled Netflix shows

Aside from nuns with guns, Warrior Nun is known for its sapphic central romance: that between Ava and another nun, Beatrice (Kristina Tonteri-Young.) (The pair canonically cement the relationship in the second season finale with a kiss.)

The show joins a whole host of recent shows scrapped by Netflix, many of which involved LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or storylines: 1899, First Kill, Fate: The Winx Saga, Q-Force, Uncoupled, GLOW. The streamer has now established a history of canceling queer shows like these after a season or two—despite positive reviews and devoted fans.

Those fans—as well as the show’s creators—are holding out hope that Warrior Nun might be picked up by another streamer. One Day at a Time, for instance, survived cancellation by being picked up by Pop, a television channel that sidestepped some of Netflix’s restrictions on how and when a show can air elsewhere.

“Working on Warrior Nun was a very special chapter of my life,” tweeted Baptista, the star of the show. “Thank you to the cast and crew for giving everything they had. Thank you to the fans that loved and supported us. I see you and I love you. It was all for you. I’m forever grateful.”

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

How China planted an FBI mole who was discovered only after gutting the CIA’s vast spy network

The FBI building in Washington, DC.The FBI building in Washington, DC.

Celal Gunes/Getty Images

  • The following is an excerpt from “SPYFAIL: Foreign Spies, Moles, Saboteurs, and the Collapse of America’s Counterintelligence” by James Bamford.
  • An alleged spy within the FBI may be largely responsible for unraveling the CIA’s Chinese spy network.

The FBI’s website carries a stark warning. “The counterintelligence and economic espionage efforts emanating from the government of China,” it says, “are a grave threat to the economic well-being and democratic values of the United States. Confronting this threat is the FBI’s top counterintelligence priority.” But far worse is the threat to the lives of scores of courageous Chinese agents who have volunteered to spy for the U.S. within their own country. Over the past decade, more than a dozen agents recruited by the CIA have been killed or imprisoned.

And it now turns out that it was an alleged Chinese spy within the FBI’s own counterintelligence division who may have been largely responsible. A spy whose activities went undetected for upwards of two decades, until his quiet arrest in 2020. Currently in a Hawaiian jail, his little-known case is wrapped in layers of secrecy as he awaits trail. Now in his new book, “SPYFAIL: Foreign Spies, Moles, Saboteurs and the Collapse of America’s Counterintelligence,” author James Bamford peels back many of those hidden layers.


THE RENDEZVOUS

Spy Fail James Bamford book cover“Spy Fail” by James Bamford.

Twelve Books

In the spring of 2001, Chinese intelligence was on a very big roll. On April 1, a Navy EP-3 electronic spy plane, operated by the National Security Agency and on patrol along the Chinese coast, was forced to make an emergency landing on China’s Hainan Island. After evacuating the crew, Chinese intelligence agents went to work extracting some of the agency’s most secret espionage and cryptologic equipment, along with piles of documents classified above top secret.  An enormous windfall, the hardware, software, and documents gave Chinese intelligence critical insight into the NSA’s targets in their country, and the methods used to spy on them.  And less than a week earlier, Chinese intelligence came upon another intelligence bonanza when two former CIA clandestine officers, one born in Shanghai and the other in Hong Kong, agreed to change sides.

At the time, four years after the handover from Britain to China, much of Hong Kong remained a world of neon and noise. But now a great many of the tourists haggling over Rolex watches, checking into the Peninsula, and packing Lan Kwai Fong and other nightlife districts had a decidedly Mandarin accent. “Five years ago, everyone looked down on you if you spoke Mandarin,” said a Beijing executive living in Hong Kong. “Now, they know we’re the big bosses with the money.”

Despite predictions that the former colony would turn into a gray vista of hunched workers and nameless noodle shops, travelers from mainland China had become the principal source of visitors to Hong Kong. They were even spending more per capita than their American and Japanese counterparts. And March 2001 was an especially busy time. As soon as the Hong Kong Arts Festival ended, the Hong Kong International Film Festival began.

Deep in the shadows, the city had also become a major crossroads for Eastern and Western spies. “Hong Kong is a place where foreign intelligence agencies conduct a lot of activity,” admitted Li Gang, the deputy director of Beijing’s Liaison Office in the city. As the arts crowd checked out of their rooms and the film fans checked in, two former American spies quietly slipped into another hotel for a discreet rendezvous with their Chinese counterparts. They were brothers who had both worked as clandestine CIA officers in China, and now they were about to switch sides.

Alexander Yuk Ching Ma and his older brother David were both veterans of the CIA’s clandestine operations division. David was born in Shanghai in 1935, a time of smoky jazz clubs, bustling casinos, and opium dens. The Pudong District, on the eastern bank of the Huangpu River, became the country’s major financial hub, and decades later it would also become its high-tech eavesdropping hub.

In 1961, at the age of twenty-six, David moved to Los Angeles, became a naturalized U.S. citizen, and six years later joined the CIA in an entry-level capacity, possibly as a translator. But in the late 1960s the United States was in the middle of its desperate war with North Vietnam, which was aided by China. As a result, a throng of new recruits were continuously making their way to Camp Perry, known as “The Farm,” the CIA’s boot camp for spies, near Williamsburg, Virginia.

The problem was, nearly all had the physical appearance of cheering fans at a Notre Dame football game. Few would blend into a crowd on a street in Asia. Also, very few spoke Chinese or Vietnamese, especially with any fluency. That was good for David, and in 1971 he was promoted to the officer ranks within the CIA’s clandestine service. Entrusted with the identities of many of the agency’s human sources in China and elsewhere, as well as its system of covert communications (known as “covcom”), he spent years in the Far East.

Hong Kong Happy Valley Tai ChiPeople do Tai Chi exercises in Hong Kong’s Happy Valley district in February 2001.

Dustin Shum/South China Morning Post via Getty Images

In 1983, David resigned after it was determined that he was inappropriately using his government position to assist Chinese nationals in obtaining entry into the United States. But months before, as if taking his place, his thirty-year-old brother Alex had joined up and also became a clandestine officer. He was born in Hong Kong and, like David, lived for a time in Shanghai. Both also graduated from the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Following extensive training at The Farm, he was also provided with the identities of the agency’s networks of spies, the various covcom details, and was sent to the Far East. Seven years later he left the agency, and around 1995 he moved to China, there oddly being no restrictions on former spies moving to their target nations. Therefore, little is known about his activities there.

David, however, ran into serious legal and financial trouble. In 1998, while living in Los Angeles, he pled guilty to two counts of defrauding a lending institution. In December he began serving a five-month sentence at Taft Correctional Institution, a low-security federal prison near Bakersfield, California, followed by five years of probation and $145,623 in restitution — money he didn’t have. Then in 2000, his brother Alex returned from China, telling Customs and Border Protection officers that he was an “importer and exporter” and was carrying $9,000 in U.S. currency. Not long after, both brothers turned up in Shanghai.

For three days, beginning on March 24, 2001, Alex and David allegedly met secretly in a hotel room with at least five officials from China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) and passed on highly classified information. According to government charges, details included the covers used by CIA officers and CIA activities in China; cryptographic information used in classified and sensitive CIA communications and reports; information concerning CIA officer identities as well as those of CIA human assets in China; the CIA’s use of operational tradecraft; and CIA secure communications practices — that is, covcom details. The brothers were then handed $50,000 in cash.

Afterward, as laid out in the indictment, both Alex and David returned to California, but they kept in touch with their handlers. Alex eventually agreed to become a mole for China’s intelligence service within the FBI, and on the day after Christmas 2002, he applied for the position of special agent. By then, however, he was about forty-nine years old and was informed that he was over the age limit.

But in 2004 he was nevertheless hired as a Chinese translator since he spoke several Chinese dialects. In many ways, this was an even better position for a spy since he would have access to a very broad range of information, including intercepted Chinese conversations. The day before he started his new job, he called a suspected accomplice, possibly David, to give him the good news that he would now be working full-time for “the other side.”

By then the FBI was reeling from another extremely damaging, and extremely embarrassing, counterintelligence disaster involving China. In 2003 it was discovered that the bureau’s key U.S.-based China asset, Katrina Leung, was, like Alex, a double agent working for China. Worse, she was simultaneously sleeping with two of the FBI’s top China agents. Among them was her longtime handler, through whom she had been passing false information for more than a decade, information that often was quickly passed on to the White House.

Assigned to the Honolulu FBI office, Alex and his wife moved into a $600,000 condominium on Hawaii Kai Drive, a short walk to the ocean on the southeastern corner of Oahu. Strongly built, with a broad natural grin, Alex wore squarish glasses above puffy cheeks that seemed to glow when he smiled, which was often. Over at least the next six years and possibly much longer, he took over the role of FBI mole where Robert Hanssen, who spied for Russia for more than two decades, left off, except for a different spymaster. It was as though no lessons had ever been learned by the bureau.

The method was simple. Attracting no suspicion, Ma would gather up piles of highly secret materials and simply walk out the door with them, just as Hanssen had done for decades. Some he photographed with a digital camera, others he downloaded from his computer onto a flash drive, while still others he copied onto CD-ROM discs. Some dealt with guided missiles and weapon systems, and others revealed the identity of confidential sources, putting their lives at risk.

FBI agents Robert Hanssen evidenceFBI agents remove evidence from Robert Hanssen’s home in Vienna, Virginia on February 20, 2001.

Alex Wong/Newsmakers

In addition, Ma had extensive knowledge of the CIA’s highly secret covcom techniques by which CIA officers communicated with their sources. Every few months, once he had accumulated a load of secrets, he would call his handlers. They would then book him a hotel room in Shanghai, pick him up at the airport, and take him into town, where he would hand over his secrets and be debriefed by agents of the Shanghai State Security Bureau (SSSB).

The SSSB was the regional office of the Ministry of State Security, China’s equivalent of both the CIA and FBI. Headquartered in Beijing at Xiyuan (Western Garden), next to the vast ensemble of lakes, gardens, and palaces of the Summer Palace, its logo still displays the hammer and sickle of the Communist Party. At the time, it was run by Minister of State Security Xu Yongyue, a stern-faced senior party official from Zhenping County, the jade capital of China, in the province of Henan. And in charge of the SSSB was Cai Xumin, who received a very significant promotion to vice minister of the MSS in 2004, likely due to his recruitment of Ma.

Following the rendezvous and document drops in Shanghai, Ma would simply fly back to Honolulu. At one point a curious U.S. customs official pulled him aside for a secondary search and discovered he was carrying $20,000 in cash and a shiny new set of golf clubs. But no questions were raised, no actions were taken, and later that day Ma sent an email to his SSSB handler with an attachment containing additional classified information. Other money paid to him by the MSS was regularly deposited in a bank account in Hong Kong.

David Ma also secretly remained in the loop. Living in Arcadia, a wealthy Los Angeles bedroom community, he established himself as a consultant on immigration rights for the many Asian immigrants in the nearby communities, such as Alhambra and Monterey Park. Familiar with their needs and fluent in various Chinese dialects, including Mandarin, Cantonese, Shanghai, and Chaozhou, he opened several businesses. They included the Chinese American Civil Rights Organization and AsiAmerica Immigration & Consultancy, Inc.

Ironically, in 2005 he was quoted in a Los Angeles Times article about Chinese espionage. As China’s economy continued to boom, he said, he could understand the temptation of some Chinese Americans who wanted to do business there to help the government any way they could. “I’m not saying all of them are spies,” he said. “But for some of them it is outright greed because they need to do business with [the Chinese government]. It’s just like barter or exchange.”

Because of his businesses, David became very well known within the Chinese communities in Los Angeles, which was ideal for the SSSB and MSS. Critical for them was discovering community members who had become confidential informants on China for the CIA and FBI. In February 2006, Alex Ma, China’s mole in the FBI, sent David photos he received from his handlers of five suspected human sources. Accompanying the pictures was a photo of five dogs sitting on a park bench, which was a coded way of asking him to supply the identity of the sources. Shortly thereafter, David sent Alex an email identifying two of the informants. And a memory card belonging to Alex had pictures of the five sources along with a list of five names.

Shanghai Pudong district Huangpu RiverShanghai’s Pudong district in August 2006.

Athanasios Gioumpasis/Getty Images

A few months later, Alex arranged for his wife, Amy Ma, who was also born in Hong Kong, to fly to Shanghai to meet with his handlers and to deliver an encrypted laptop computer to them. An email message soon came back thanking him for sending his wife and delivering “the present.” Over the years, without suspicion, Alex continued to fly back and forth to Shanghai every few months with stashes of secrets. And in June 2008, his handler phoned him to say that his “company” would have a lot of work orders in the coming year.

In May 2010, a few months after another clandestine rendezvous to hand over documents to his handler, Alex received a phone call from an MSS officer apologizing for not seeing him during a recent visit to China and extending an invitation to meet in Shanghai in the future. He also asked Alex to get in touch with David and see if he would be willing to discuss their “business venture.” About the same time, the MSS was also bringing on board another veteran CIA clandestine officer, one who had just reapplied to the agency, possibly to become a mole. Known as Zhen Cheng Li in China, he was Jerry Chun Shing Lee to his colleagues at Langley.

Born in Hong Kong like Alex, Lee grew up in Hawaii and became a naturalized U.S. citizen. At seventeen, in 1982, he joined the U.S. Army, serving for four years but remaining in the reserves. A few years later he enrolled at Hawaii Pacific University, graduating in 1992 with a degree in international business management. A year later he earned a master’s degree in human resource management and shortly thereafter joined the CIA as a case officer in the clandestine service. Over the following fourteen years, he was dispatched on numerous overseas assignments, including to China, where he, like Alex and David Ma, had access to the agency’s clandestine networks, both human and covcom.

By July 2007, Lee had become frustrated by his lack of advancement at the CIA. “He was quite critical about the organization and his time there; the fact that he didn’t get credit, he didn’t get promoted, he didn’t get the assignments he deserved,” said one of his associates. As a result, Lee resigned and moved to Hong Kong, taking a job with Japan Tobacco International ( JTI). Employing about forty thousand people around the world, the company sells 120 brands of cigarettes, including both Camel and Winston outside the United States.

But a key problem for the company was tobacco smugglers and counterfeiters. Asian crime syndicates were exporting tons of counterfeit cigarettes out of China with the help of corrupt officials. To combat the syndicates, the company had established a Brand Integrity Unit under a veteran CIA officer, David Reynolds, who had worked at the agency from 1988 to 2002. Afterward he was assigned as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou for two years. Lee claimed that his last job at the CIA was the agency’s official liaison in Beijing to Chinese intelligence, the MSS, and he was hired by Reynolds.

Now, with an office on the forty-second floor of Tower 1 in Times Square, the city’s flashy, upscale shopping and restaurant complex at Causeway Bay, Lee could see all of Hong Kong spread out below him. But adjusting to private industry was difficult and he soon ran into problems. Company officials began to suspect that he was alerting corrupt Chinese officials about the firm’s investigations and the pending raids and arrests by law enforcement. “Several of the shipments of counterfeits purchased as part of the investiga-tions were seized by the Chinese authorities or simply disappeared, and one of our contract investigators was arrested and imprisoned in China,” said a manager.

All evidence pointed toward Lee, and as a result, executives at JTI alerted the FBI, but apparently no action was ever taken. Lee was finally fired in mid- 2009, and soon afterward a Chinese official warned the company that he was not only continuing to share information with MSS officers, but was also actively working with them. And once again JTI officials passed the information to the FBI. “I certainly reported it to the appropriate authorities,” said a company supervisor. It was good information, but once again it seemed to go nowhere within the bureau. At about the same time, Lee hooked up with a potential business partner, Barry Cheung Kam-lun, a former Hong Kong police officer who, Lee knew, had close ties to the MSS. And on April 26 the two traveled across the Hong Kong border to neighboring Shenzhen for a private dinner with MSS officers.

Shenzhen, China.Shenzhen, China.

Liao Xun/Getty Images

It was time for the official pitch. After excusing Barry, the intelligence officers and Lee reached an agreement that he would begin passing secrets to them and act as their spy. In exchange, they handed him a briefcase full of cash, $100,000, along with an agreement to take care of him “for life.” It would be the first of hundreds of thousands of dollars he would receive, and within a few weeks he began receiving his taskings, key among them apparently becoming a mole in the CIA, as Alex Ma had done in the FBI. That same month, he applied for reemployment with the CIA. But given his less than illustrious career and departure from the agency, it went nowhere.

Instead, possibly as a cover, Lee and Barry Cheung Kam-lun established their own company, FTM International, to enter the “Big Tobacco” wars and conduct their own brand integrity investigations. After investing nearly $400,000, they set up shop in the down-market Wan Chai area, renting space in Dannies House. Unlike JTI’s soaring skyscraper in Times Square, Lee’s new office was in a tired thirteen-story orange high-rise with battered air-conditioning units stuck out the windows like giant steel bird feeders.

But two years later, fed up with Hong Kong and having run out of secrets to sell, Lee decided to move his family back to Virginia, where he had been offered a potential job by the CIA. It had been secretly created to lure him back to the United States, and in August 2012, during a three-day stopover in Hawaii, agents conducted a black bag job on his hotel room. What they found was damning. Inside a small, clear plastic travel pack was a forty-nine-page datebook and a twenty-one-page address book, both of which contained top secret handwritten operational notes from his CIA days. Most critically, they included the true names of secret human sources as well as the dates and operational locations of the meetings. Another clandestine search was conducted on his hotel room in Fairfax, Virginia, soon after he arrived, and the information remained in his possession.

But inexplicably, rather than Lee being arrested, the decision was made to simply question him repeatedly over the following year. Finally, after the fifth interview in June 2013, with the questions becoming more and more revealing of what the bureau knew, Lee fled with his family back to China-controlled Hong Kong. Once more he was out of reach, and once more the FBI had bungled it.

Over the next few years, Lee did security work for the cosmetics company Estée Lauder and the auction house Christie’s. Then in January 2018, apparently believing the danger had blown over, he boarded a Cathay Pacific flight to New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport. It was a serious mistake. His name had been flagged on the airline’s manifest and he was arrested as soon as he landed. After first vowing to fight the espionage charges, in May 2019 he agreed to plead guilty and was sentenced to nineteen years in prison.

Around the same time, the FBI finally discovered the Chinese mole who had bored his way into the organization sixteen years earlier. In August 2020, an agent posing as an MSS officer approached Alex Ma in Honolulu and snared him in a sting operation. To convince Ma of his bona fides, he showed him a video of the meeting between him, David, and the SSSB agents at the time they signed on as spies in 2001. The pretend MSS officer then offered Ma $2,000 in cash as a “small token” of appreciation for Ma’s assistance to China. Ma offered to continue working for the MSS and stated that he wanted “the motherland” to succeed. Shortly afterward he was arrested on charges of espionage and is currently awaiting trial. With regard to David, then eighty-five years old, the decision was made not to arrest him due to his advanced stage of Alzheimer’s disease.

James Bamford, winner of the National Magazine Award for Reporting, is the bestselling author of “The Puzzle Palace,” “Body of Secrets,” and other books on intelligence. His most recent book, from which this excerpt was taken, is “SPYFAIL: Foreign Spies, Moles, Saboteurs and the Collapse of America’s Counterintelligence,” which will be released on January 17.

Excerpted from “SPYFAIL: Foreign Spies, Moles, Saboteurs, and the Collapse of America’s Counterintelligence.” ©2022 James Bamford and reprinted by permission from Twelve Books/Hachette Book Group.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

A tech news site issued a string of corrections after an article quietly written by AI got key facts wrong

AI artificial intelligence illustrationRecent advancements in AI technology have been hailed as “magic” by some and met with trepidation by others.

NurPhoto/Getty Images

  • CNET was forced to make major corrections to an article written by AI due to multiple inaccuracies. 
  • CNET quietly began using AI writing in articles in November, officially revealing the practice last week.
  • While some have praised controversial AI technology like ChatGPT as “magic,” others have warned it’s prone to falsehoods.  

CNET seems to have discovered AI’s limitations the hard way. 

On Sunday, the tech news and product reviews publication was forced to make multiple corrections to an article written by AI due to inaccuracies in basic math throughout the piece.

The article, which explained compound interest, contained at least 5 errors, including incorrectly calculating how much a person would earn if they deposited $10,000 into a savings account that earns 3%: AI said the person would earn $10,300 instead of $300. 

Since the launch of ChatGPT, OpenAI’s chatbot, in late November, AI’s rapid advancement has been met with both celebration and horror. Some executives have called the technology “magic,” while others have warned ChatGPT is still prone to get basic facts wrong. 

In fact, this author recently attempted to use ChatGPT to write an Insider article from scratch. At first glance, the bot’s work was impressive, but a closer read revealed the piece was riddled with inaccuracies. 

Despite some of AI’s flaws, CNET began quietly publishing articles “assisted by an AI engine and reviewed, fact-checked and edited by our editorial staff” in November. The publication’s use of AI writing was first revealed by science and technology news site Futurism last week. After the revelation, CNET came clean, saying it has published about 75 articles using the technology. 

“For over two decades, CNET has built our reputation testing new technologies and separating the hype from reality, from voice assistants to augmented reality to the metaverse,” the company’s editor-in-chief wrote in a blog post. 

Despite the recent spate of corrections, CNET did not indicate that it’s ready to stop using AI to write articles altogether. Instead, in a statement to Insider, CNET said they “are actively reviewing all our AI-assisted pieces to make sure no further inaccuracies made it through the editing process.” 

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

I asked ChatGPT to write my resignation letter but instead I got career coaching

An image of a phone with ChatGPT and OpenAI's logo visible.ChatGPT, OpenAI’s buzzy new chatbot, is a sensation.

NurPhoto/Getty Images

  • My editor asked me to see whether ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, could write a decent resignation letter.
  • I’d had a hard week at work, and the assignment gave me an opportunity to (artificially) quit.
  • But I hadn’t expected that the personalized resignation letter would prompt self-reflection.

If ChatGPT, OpenAI’s buzzy new chatbot, can write cover letters good enough to grab the attention of recruiters, can it write a passable resignation letter?

That was the question my editor posed to me one day in a team meeting, and I valiantly volunteered for the mission. (It had been a tough week, and the assignment strangely appealed to me. Come on, who hasn’t fantasized about quitting their job? The chance to live out my daydream — even artificially — was an opportunity to seize.)

I looked forward to receiving my resignation in pixelated form. (Did I mention I was having a hard week?) It’s not that I wanted to quit, necessarily, but I’m tired and maybe suffering from some pandemic burnout, like a lot of people. Besides, having spent the past two years as a careers and workplace reporter covering the “Great Resignation,” an unprecedented period in which workers have been quitting — and changing — jobs at record-high levels, some part of me longed to join the crowd.

What I didn’t expect was that the effect of seeing ChatGPT’s personalized resignation letter in black and white would be so jarring. I thought that I was fulfilling an assignment to help prospective quitters take care of an otherwise tedious task. Instead, I got career counseling.

Logging on took a while

First things first: I needed to log on to the chatbot. This took some time. ChatGPT was released to the public in late November, and within five days, it gained more than 1 million users. Lately, it’s been overrun with requests. And while I initially found charming the chatbot’s joking attempts to “explain its status” in Shakespearean prose, pirate talk, and sea-otter speak, they soon grated on me.

Finally, after four days of trying, I got in. My request was straightforward and so was the reply:

Can you write me a resignation letter for my job as Senior Correspondent at Insider? My last day is February 1.

Dear [Editor’s Name],

I am writing to inform you of my resignation as Senior Correspondent at Insider, effective February 1st.

I would like to thank you and the entire team at Insider for the opportunities and experiences I have had while working here. I have greatly appreciated the support and guidance provided by my colleagues and superiors during my time at the company.

I assure you I will do everything possible to ensure a smooth transition and to make sure that my departure will have minimal impact on the team and the projects that I have been working on. I will gladly assist in training or finding a replacement, and I will make sure that all of my current assignments are completed to the best of my abilities before my last day.

Thank you again for the time and opportunities that I have had while working at Insider.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

Can you write me a resignation letter?Can you write me a resignation letter?

Insider

Momentary joy, then panic

Well, there it was. I could now quit. The catharsis was real. Assignment done.

But as I read it again, my exhilaration turned to panic. See, in addition to covering the Great Resignation, I’ve also written recently about the softening of the economy, mounting layoffs in tech — many others in the media industry — and a possible recession. I’m a worrier by nature, so quitting might not be a good idea (for me, at least; many others think differently).

What’s more, the letter’s reference to “the support and guidance provided by my colleagues and superiors” left me feeling tender. The wording was generic, but the sentiment was apt. I can’t leave, can I?

Luckily, I could ask the AI: 

What if I change my mind and I don’t want to resign?

If you change your mind and decide that you do not want to resign, you can try to retract your resignation letter. It will be up to your employer to decide whether or not to accept your retraction. It’s always best to speak with your manager or supervisor and have an open and honest conversation about your decision.

It’s important to keep in mind that once you have submitted a resignation letter, it may be difficult to take back, and your employer may have already begun making plans to fill your position. It’s also worth to consider that if you do retract your resignation, it may damage your relationship with your employer and colleagues.

It’s best to weigh all the pros and cons before making a final decision and talk it over with someone you trust.

It’s good to have options — and advice you can trust

ChatGPT is right, of course. Quitting then un-quitting is not a good career move. (Looking at you, Tom Brady.)

I was enjoying the back-and-forth. True, ChatGPT’s answers were robotic, but I work from home and it gets lonely sometimes. Plus, my kids are teens/tweens, and getting immediate, fulsome responses from ChatGPT was satisfying. 

I wanted to keep the conversation going, so I asked one last question based on the previous response:

Who can I trust?

It’s important to have people in your life that you can trust and confide in. Some people you may consider talking to include:

  • A close friend or family member who you trust and who will give you honest and unbiased advice.
  • A mentor or someone who has more experience in similar situations who you respect and can guide you.
  • A therapist or counselor who can provide a neutral and confidential space to talk through your thoughts and feelings.
  • A career coach or a professional who can help you think through your career choices.

It’s also important to remember that you can trust yourself. Take the time to reflect on your decision, and consider what is best for you and your career.

Amen. Everyone needs reliable and honest people in their lives. And you can trust yourself. If you’re ever unsure, ChatGPT is a decent sounding board.

Look, I don’t mean to gloss over ChatGPT’s problems. The chatbot is not only rife with bias but also could allow students to cheat, spread misinformation, and be used to enable questionable business practices. But for simple chores, like writing resignation letters, it seems useful and could even prompt a bit of self-reflection.

My week is looking up. Note to my editor (hi there!): I’m not resigning today. But when I do — some day long into the future — I know where to turn to write my letter.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

North Dakota weighs ban of ‘sexually explicit’ library books

Books containing “sexually explicit” content — including depictions of sexual or gender identity — would be banned from North Dakota public libraries under legislation that state lawmakers began considering Tuesday.

The GOP-dominated state House Judiciary Committee heard arguments but did not take a vote on the measure, which applies to visual depictions of “sexually explicit” content and proposes up to 30 days imprisonment for librarians who refuse to remove the offending books.

The proposal comes amid a national wave of Republican-backed laws to ban books that feature LGBTQ subject matter — though usually those bills have been limited to school libraries, not public ones.

Supporters of the bill said it would preserve children’s innocence and reduce their exposure to pornography.

But critics said the measure is “steeped in discrimination” and would allow government censorship of material that is not actually obscene.

House Majority Leader Mike Lefor, of Dickinson, introduced the bill and said public libraries currently contain books that have “disturbing and disgusting” content, including ones that describe virginity as a silly label and assert that gender is fluid.

Lefor argued that a child’s exposure to such content has been associated with addiction, poor self esteem, devalued intimacy, increasing divorce rates, unprotected sex among young people and poor well-being — though did he did not offer any evidence to support such claims.

Stark County resident Autumn Richard also spoke in favor of the bill, giving examples of explicit content in the graphic novel “Let’s Talk About It: The Teen’s Guide to Sex, Relationships, and Being a Human” and the kids’ comic book “Sex Is a Funny Word” — both available in public libraries.

Richard argued the books might have beneficial knowledge about contraceptives, body image and abusive relationships, but many sections provide information that she said was harmful for minors.

Though supporters of North Dakota’s bill repeatedly called the sexual content “obscene,” opponents said the material in question is not actually considered legally obscene.

“Nearly 50 years ago, the (U.S.) Supreme Court set the high constitutional bar that defines obscenity,” said Cody Schuler, an advocacy manager at the American Civil Liberties Union of North Dakota, who testified against the bill.

Obscenity is a narrow, well-defined category of unprotected speech that excludes any work with serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value, Schuler said. Few, if any, books have been deemed obscene, and the standard for restraining a library’s ability to distribute a book are even more stringent, Schuler added.

The definition of pornography is also subjective, opponents of the bill said.

Library Director Christine Kujawa at Bismarck Veterans Memorial Public Library said the library has a book with two little hamsters on the cover. At the end of the book, the hamsters get married, and they are both male.

“It’s a cute book,” Kujawa said — but it would be considered pornography under the bill because the book includes gender identity.

Facing criminal charges for keeping books on shelves is “something I never thought I would have to consider during my career as a librarian,” Kujawa added.

In addition to banning depictions of “sexual identity” and “gender identity,” the measure specifies 10 other things that library books cannot visually depict, including “sexual intercourse,” “sexual preference” and “sexual perversion,” — though it does not define any of those terms. The proposal does not apply to books that have “serious artistic significance” or “materials used in science courses,” among other exceptions.

The bill would allow prosecutors to charge any person who displays these materials at places that children visit with a class B misdemeanor. The maximum penalty is 30 days of imprisonment and a $1,500 fine.

The wave of attempted book banning and restrictions continues to intensify across the country, the American Library Association reported in September. Numbers for 2022 approached the previous year’s totals, which were the highest in decades. Bills to restrict mature content in school libraries became laws last year in Tennessee, Utah, Missouri, Florida and Oklahoma.

The most targeted books have included Maia Kobabe’s graphic memoir about sexual identity, “Gender Queer,” and Jonathan Evison’s “Lawn Boy,” a coming-of-age novel narrated by a young gay man, according to an April report.

The U.S. Department of Education investigated the removal of LGBTQ-themed books from the library of a Texas school district in December. The investigation followed a complaint by the ACLU and appeared to be the first based on a nationwide movement to ban school library books dealing with sexuality and gender.

___

Trisha Ahmed is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow her on Twitter: @TrishaAhmed15

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE