Categories
Selected Articles

Генерал ВС США Марк Милли признал неспособность ВСУ вытеснить ВС РФ с Украины

This article links to a state controlled Russian media. Read more.

7_13c.jpg

Exclamation_flat_icon.svg This article links to a state controlled Russian media. Read more.

Украинской армии не удастся выбить российские войска с Украины. Об этом заявил председатель комитета начальников штабов вооруженных сил США генерал Марк Милли.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Opinion | Donald Trump Is Finally Finished

15stephens-1-facebookJumbo.jpg

Credit…Tom Brenner for The New York Times

  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

    Give this articleGive this articleGive this article

Whether or not Donald Trump’s hat is in the ring, he’s finished as a serious contender for high office.

That’s not a line to write lightly. First, because he has been written off so often in the past — after mocking John McCain’s military record; after the “Access Hollywood” tape; after Jan. 6; after the Jan. 6 committee hearings — that it seems foolhardy to do it again. Second, because every time he is written off, his supporters seem to draw energy from their purported irrelevance. And third, because the line will surely be hung around my neck if I’m wrong.

But I’m not.

Last week, the realization finally dawned on his devoted supporters that Trump can no longer deliver what they want most: power. Or, let me put it in language more congenial to them: Whatever purpose they believe he was meant to serve — bringing working-class voters back to the Republican fold; restoring nationalism to conservative ideology; rejecting the authority of supposed experts — has been served. Others can now do the same thing better, without the drama and divisiveness. He’s yesterday’s man.

This is an observation made from an objective reading of political reality: Trump cost Republicans dearly in the midterms.

In key Senate and gubernatorial races, the former president proffered his endorsements based on fealty over electability. He turned election denialism into a loyalty oath. Primary victories became Pyrrhic ones. In the same states where mainstream Republicans won handily (Chris Sununu in New Hampshire, Brian Kemp in Georgia, Mike DeWine in Ohio), Trump’s candidates either underperformed or lost — a contrast that again gives the lie to the notion that Democrats somehow won thanks only to cheating, bending rules or taking advantage of early voting.

But none of this alone would be enough to turn off Trump’s devotees — just as Republican losses of the House in 2018, the White House in 2020 and the Senate in 2021 weren’t enough. Three additional factors were required.

The first is shock.

Republicans expected a blowout win last week every bit as much as Democrats expected one for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Many of the polls predicted one, as did the normal ebb and flow of American politics. Joe Biden is an unpopular incumbent presiding over an inflationary economy and a border crisis. For the G.O.P. to underperform so badly is a No Excuses moment for the party, and the only coherent explanation for it is the specter of Trump.

The second is that Trump is finally being abandoned by many of his usually unflagging apologists and enablers in right-wing media, whose influence will be felt downstream.

That includes Fox News’s Laura Ingraham: “If the voters conclude that you’re putting your own ego or your own grudges ahead of what’s good for the country, they’re going to look elsewhere.” It includes Townhall’s Kurt Schlichter: “Trump presents problems and we need to face them,” he admitted. “We owe Trump nothing. He’s a politician.” It includes Victor Davis Hanson: “Will an unapologetic Trump instead now escalate his slurs, bray at the moon, play out his current angry Ajax role to the bitter end, and thus himself end up a tragic hero — appreciated for past service but deemed too toxic for present company?”

None of these are full-on repudiations, though they come close. And they bring us to the third reason Trump is finally finished: his gratuitous pre-election swipe at Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, whose 19-point victory over the Democrat Charlie Crist was one of the G.O.P.’s few unequivocal highlights of election night.

The sin here was not that Trump violated Ronald Reagan’s famous Eleventh Commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.” Trump has violated that commandment as freely as he has so many of the others. It’s that he was a loser criticizing a winner — and what Trump’s base wants most of all is a winner.

A wiser Trump would have made DeSantis’s victory his own, treating the governor as his star student and designated successor. But Trump couldn’t, and can’t, help himself. And what the Republican base sees in DeSantis is everything it likes about Trump — the combativeness and self-belief and disdain for elite opinion — minus the personal baggage and habits of self-sabotage. In the battle for the affections of American conservatives, the ex-president increasingly feels like the jealous paunchy spouse, the governor like the attractive and successful neighbor.

The field of possible primary contenders might still move aside for Trump, much as Hillary Clinton mostly cleared the field the last time she ran. But with his midterm rout, Trump has proved once again that he’s toxic and can never again win a general election. He would be no match for a younger, charismatic primary candidate, just as Clinton proved no match for Barack Obama in 2008.

The field is open for a real Republican contender. It’s time someone stepped up to the plate.

Times Opinion will publish a selection of responses in a future article.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Sergei Lavrov, a fixture of Russian diplomacy facing his toughest test in Ukraine

1021.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=8

If Sergei Lavrov, the 72-year-old whiskey-drinking Russian foreign minister, had indeed experienced a heart flutter soon after stepping off the plane in Bali it would have been understandable for a man who has been cast by his leader as his stand-in punchbag at the summit.

Viewing the forces arrayed against him at the G20, President Vladimir Putin deputed Lavrov to attend the two-day event in his stead, and for a brief moment it appeared to have been too much. News agencies reported Lavrov had been sent to hospital for a checkup, only for the Russian foreign ministry to rush out a picture of Lavrov in shorts, sporting an Apple watch and Jean-Michel Basquiat-inspired T-shirt, thumbing his notes for his first address at the summit on Tuesday.

Sergei Lavrov reads documents on a patio in Bali, IndonesiaSergei Lavrov reads documents on a patio in Bali, Indonesia, on Monday. Photograph: Maria Zakharova/Telegram/Reuters

The Russian foreign ministry had a field day denouncing what it called western propaganda as a high-level lie.

Oddly, if Lavrov has succumbed to ill-health, it would have been a moment of genuine regret for some western diplomats, who over two decades have become inured to this fixture of Russian diplomacy.

“He is a rogue,” said one western diplomat, “but we all know his outbursts are stage-managed and calculated. It’s all smiles afterwards. He is a professional.”

Born in 1950 towards the end of the Stalin era to diplomatic parents, he was educated at the elite Russian Institute of International Relations before ascending to become Russia’s envoy at the UN, where for a decade he lived through the trauma of the collapse of the Soviet Union. At the time, the then US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, said Lavrov seemed a man unmoored by the fate of his country.

Appointed foreign minister in 2004, he has since then through successive US administrations developed a Putinesque revulsion for all western ideas, if not all western consumer durables. At one point, he said all the ills of the 20th century colonialism, two world wars and the cold war lay at the door of American arrogance. He has clashed with the US over Iraq, Iran, Syria and now Ukraine, all the while well briefed and loyal to his own motto, “Do not rush but pursue your goals stubbornly.” The constant theme has been the need to end the US monopoly on the international order.

But he also knows when to stop the verbal onslaughts. He once ended talks with the then US secretary of state, John Kerry, with a post-midnight dinner at the foreign ministry’s guesthouse and a toast to the American B-50B bomber that made the world’s first nonstop flight around the world in 1949 – with a wine of that year’s vintage.

The number of secretaries of state that have come and gone during Lavrov’s period at the foreign ministry – seven – is a testament to his longevity and usefulness to Putin, even if he is not seen as part of the inner sanctum of decision makers. To have survived that long given his intake of whiskey, vodka and cigarette smoke is a tribute to his reliability for Putin, but also a reproach to health advocates worldwide.

Apart from ice hockey and football, Lavrov is said to be happiest going white water rafting and fishing with friends in Siberia.

It is in the last year that he has faced his most punishing time. He had made a career out of condemning the US for the interference in the affairs of other countries, elevating this to the high point of Russian principle, and has had to contort himself to defend the special military operation in Ukraine, portraying it as an operation in defence of the Russian minorities provoked by Ukrainian aggression.

At the G20 it will take more than a health scare to stop him relentlessly sticking to his talking points.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

G-20 nations to condemn Russia’s Ukraine invasion as Foreign Minister Lavrov watches on

107151711-1668503694772-gettyimages-1441

NUSA DUA, INDONESIA – NOVEMBER 15: Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov arrives at the formal welcome ceremony to mark the beginning of the G20 Summit on November 15, 2022 in Nusa Dua, Indonesia. The G20 meetings are being held in Bali from November 15-16. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images,)

G-20 nations on Tuesday will issue a joint statement condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, saying “today’s era must not be of war.”

Leaders of the world’s largest economies are gathered in Indonesia this week. Tensions over Russia’s onslaught in Ukraine has raised questions about whether they would be able to unite on what is one of the most pressing issues globally, with Russia being a member of the G-20 grouping. Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, is attending the summit.

“Most members strongly condemned the war in Ukraine and stressed it is causing immense human suffering and exacerbating existing fragilities in the global economy — constraining growth, increasing inflation, disrupting supply chains, heightening energy and food insecurity, and elevating financial stability risks,” the joint statement will say, according to a draft document seen by CNBC.

The joint statement also said “the peaceful resolution of conflicts, efforts to address crises, as well as diplomacy and dialogue, are vital. Today’s era must not be of war.”

The communique has been agreed upon by the highest public servants of all the G-20 nations and is expected to be approved by the heads of state on Wednesday. At the time of writing, it was unclear whether China was among the nations condemning Russia’s war in Ukraine.

An official, who is following the high-level discussions in Indonesia and preferred to remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of the talks, told CNBC that “the ambiguity is there for a reason” — refraining to confirm if Beijing was among the “most members” group condemning the Kremlin.

The same official added that the G-20 “narrative is progressing because we see the consequences of the war.” “A few months ago, it would have not been possible to reach such agreement,” the source said.

In recognition of the differences of opinion, the joint statement also said: “There were other views and different assessments of the situation and sanctions.”

Russia has dubbed its invasion of Ukraine as a “special operation” aimed at “demilitarizing” its neighbor. Russia’s Foreign Minister Lavrov said Tuesday that Western countries were making the G-20 declaration politicized, according to Russian state media.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Rishi Sunak urges Russia to ‘get out’ of Ukraine at G20

“But I also think that China is an indisputable fact of the global economy and we’re not going to be able to resolve shared global challenges like climate change, or public health, or indeed actually dealing with Russia and Ukraine, without having a dialogue with them.”

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Opinion | Trump’s Announcement Is a Sign of Weakness

15douthat-2-facebookJumbo.jpg

Credit…Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

    Give this articleGive this articleGive this article

The defiant timing of Donald Trump’s announcement of his candidacy for president in 2024, dropping amid Republican recriminations over their midterm disappointments, is an admission of weakness poorly disguised as a show of strength.

The intended flex is obvious: The early announcement is meant to cow potential rivals, force them to come off the blocks explicitly running against him, seize the media spotlight, run up endorsements and fund-raising totals, and hopefully elevate the former president in national polling.

It’s also intended as a pre-emptive political strike against any potential indictment that might be awaiting him, assuring Republican primary voters that the Biden Department of Justice is coming after him only because they want to keep him from the White House.

Even before the midterm results, though, it was a sign of Trump’s potential weakness that such calculation was even necessary. If the former president were as strong as he wished everyone to imagine him to be, he could have afforded to wait in Mar-a-Lago, accepting supplicants, while any pretenders exhausted themselves with futile campaigning and the people clamored for their once and future king.

Instead, he decided on this move, telegraphing it before the midterms, because his position had steadily weakened over the course of 2022. The emergence of Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida as the singular, popular, potentially deep-pocketed rival, the drip-drip of state polling showing DeSantis competitive with Trump, the uncertain politics of a potential prosecution, the pre-election polling showing more Republicans identifying with their party than with Trump — it all created a scenario in which the former president remained the favorite, but he clearly needed to do more to win than simply show up.

And now the results of the election, the DeSantis landslide in Florida and the consistent underperformance of Trump-associated Republican candidates nationwide, have made it uncertain whether the former president should even be considered the 2024 favorite anymore. This isn’t just a matter of Trump-skeptical conservatives griping on Twitter or anonymous Republican politicians hoping vaguely that this time will be different; a pair of postelection surveys of potential GOP voters, one national and one of delegate-rich Texas, show DeSantis suddenly in the lead. So do polls of early primary and caucus states commissioned by the Club for Growth — a formerly Trump-allied outfit, now increasingly aligned against him.

A Politico-Morning Consult poll released today shows Trump leading DeSantis nationally 47 to 33 percent, so it’s too soon to talk about Trump as a primary-season underdog. But even that poll suggests he’s starting under 50 percent, despite a claim to incumbency and universal name recognition, which suggests a difficult battle for the nomination rather than an easy coast or coronation.

This means, among other things, that the campaign that he just began — in a notably low-energy style, it must be said — will need an actual strategy. And here the very Trumpification of the G.O.P., the routing of his enemies and the burial of the older models of Republicanism, may work against his attempted restoration. As David Byler of The Washington Post noted in a shrewd summertime column, by remaking the party in his own image, Trump has potentially given some of his supporters permission to look elsewhere in 2024.

Much of Trump’s success in 2016, Byler pointed out, rested on his distinctiveness within that year’s G.O.P. field. This wasn’t just a matter of his celebrity status or his zest for demagogy. He also tapped into a fundamental policy mismatch between the Republican Party and many of its voters, by running to the party establishment’s right on immigration and somewhat to its left on issues like foreign policy, health care and entitlement reform.

Flash forward to 2022, however, and those contrasts have diminished. On substance and style alike, the party and its leaders moved closer to Trump during his presidency; at the same time, by governing as a fairly conventional Republican — tax cuts, yes; infrastructure, not so much — Trump also moved closer to the party. This convergence has left rank-and-file Republicans more satisfied with the G.O.P. than they were in 2016, while depriving Trump of signature issues that might set him apart from a figure like DeSantis. And the main exception, his determination to relitigate the 2020 election, isn’t obviously a high priority even within the Republican Party — and it’s likely to be less of one now that so many “Stop the Steal” candidates have gone down to general-election defeat.

This vulnerability need not be fatal to his second coming. Trump’s mythic narrative — the wronged and exiled king returning to claim his throne — remains potent, and his adaptable ruthlessness has not yet been turned to the task of making DeSantis look like the smaller, weaker man.

But running on the mythos alone, making the primary a crude test of loyalty while bragging about his past glories and accomplishments, probably isn’t enough to defeat a disciplined primary rival with unified establishment support. And it also sets up Trump poorly for a general election, should he eke out a victory. In 2016, his primary-season populism, anti-establishment and anti-globalization, segued naturally into the general election pitch that helped him win the Midwest, and with it the electoral college. It’s hard to see a similar segue from a primary season message fixated on voter-fraud conspiracy or endlessly replaying his first term’s greatest hits.

So to the extent that Trump and his team are capable of executing a strategy, they will be looking for versions of what he found six years ago: opportunities to outflank a more establishment Republican in multiple directions, from the right one moment and the left the next.

Those opportunities will depend on the specific positions that DeSantis or some other rival (but come on, it can really only be DeSantis) ends up taking. For example, Trump’s announcement speech’s boast about his record of peacemaking previews a scenario where the Ukraine war drags on while a potential Taiwan crisis continues to percolate, Beltway Republicans continue to take a generally hawkish line (the populist flank in the House notwithstanding) and Trump pitches himself as the peace candidate, the tough guy who can make the necessary deals with Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping to stabilize the world.

Or in domestic policy, you can imagine a world in which the desire to appear tough on inflation tugs Republicans toward austerity politics, allowing Trump to pull off some shamelessly dishonest posturing: We replaced Obamacare with Trumpcare, it’s beautiful and it works, and now a bunch of Swamp Creatures and Ron DeSanctimonious want to take it away. Which then could be paired with some extreme and shocking gesture that even a practiced culture-warrior like DeSantis might be loath to imitate, some variation on the Muslim ban.

We don’t know what that gesture might be, but that’s the point — just the original idea of a Muslim ban was an on-the-fly response to Islamist terrorism, the headlines of 2023 will presumably offer something suited to Trump’s instincts.

It’s those instincts, ultimately, that were decisive in the destruction of Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz in 2016 — the shamelessness, the cunning, the ideological flexibility, the quick sizing-up opponents’ weaknesses. Does Trump still have them sharp and ready? Is he too deep in his labyrinth of self-pity and conspiracy?

Lucky America; lucky Republican Party; lucky, lucky media: Everyone gets to spend the next year and more finding out.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Biden flies out of Bali after condemning ‘MERCILESS’ Russian strikes

64597561-0-image-a-95_1668582027774.jpg

Published: 06:48 GMT, 16 November 2022 | Updated: 07:12 GMT, 16 November 2022

President Joe Biden left Bali on Wednesday at the end of a six-day foreign policy blitz that took him to three countries and all the way around the world.

His final day at the G20 summit on the Indonesian island was upended by an explosion in Poland, five miles from the border with Ukraine, that triggered worries of a N.A.T.O. retaliatory strike if Russia were to blame.

And back home Donald Trump hogged the headlines by announcing his bid to win back the White House in 2024.

Biden shrugged off Trump’s run. When asked if he wanted to comment, he responded: ‘Not really.’

He left Bali after taking part in a photo-friendly event meant to promote environmental stewardship. It was intended to be the lingering image of a conference where sometimes fractured nations could work out their differences.

But even here, the explosion in Poland obtruded into what the G20 organizers had planned.

Biden’s top-level diplomacy forced him to delay his arrival for the planting with Indonesian president Joko Widodo.

That came after Biden gave the Indonesian his regrets for missing a gala dinner and cultural performance the night before.

A White House official emailed DailyMail.com: ‘He just had spent a full day in meetings and needed to attend to a few things tonight (nothing urgent!).’

When Biden did make it to the mangrove event, he joined leaders decked out in matching white shirts, with most of them wearing white baseball caps at the Hutan Mangrove Forrest.

Not all G20 participants were there. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov had already left. Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad in Salman, another controversial presence in Bali, also wasn’t there.

President Joe Biden boarded Air Force One for the long flight back to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, after a six-day, three-summit trip around the world, that ended with the G20 meeting in Bali, Indonesia

On his final day, Biden joined other world leaders to plant trees at a mangrove forest on the tropical island of Bali

Biden also met the new British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on the final day of his overseas trip

Biden smiled and posed with the group, though he opted for a blue shirt and his trademark aviator shades. All held up shovels for the cameras.

The group lined up against mangrove saplings for the planting. The trees are critical to habitat for a range of creatures and have other environmental benefits – with Indonesia touting its own carbon capturing potential as a way to do its part amid pressing climate change.

‘Push to fill the hole with soil,’ an announcer told the group.

‘You may immerse yourselves in the beauty of nature,’ she instructed.

Biden had already had a busy day by then.

Officials said Biden was woken early to be told of the explosion in Poland. 

He telephoned the Polish president to offer U.S. support for its investigation, before calling a morning emergency meeting with other N.A.T.O. leaders in Bali to discuss a joint response.

Then he addressed the media to say initial indications were that Russia was not responsible.

‘There is preliminary information that contests that,’ he told reporters outside his hotel after crisis talks with allies. 

‘I don’t want to say that until we completely investigate but it is unlikely in the … trajectory that it was fired from Russia, but we’ll see.’

He condemned Russia’s aggression against Ukraine as ‘totally unconscionable,’ particularly at a time when world leaders had come together in Bali to further isolate Moscow.

American officials later said initial assessments suggested the missile was fired by Ukrainian forces at an incoming Russian projectile.

President Joe Biden called an emergency meeting of G7 and N.A.T.O. leaders on the Indonesian island of Bali on Wednesday morning as Poland investigates an explosion that killed two people five miles from its border with Ukraine

President Joe Biden spoke by phone with Polish President Andrzej Duda on Wednesday morning from his hotel in Bali, Indonesia. He is joined by his National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan while Secretary of State Antony Blinken takes notes from the sofa, in this handout picture supplied by the White House after an explosion in Poland

Biden condemned the latest Russian missile strikes on Wednesday as ‘totally unconscionable’ but urged the world to wait for an investigation into an explosion in Poland that killed two people five miles inside the border from Ukraine

But with Russia launching what Ukraine said were the heaviest missile strikes of the nine-month war, immediate suspicion fell on Moscow. 

That could trigger N.A.T.O.’s principle of collective defense known as Article 5, in which an attack on one of the Western alliance’s members is deemed an attack on all – and raising the prospect of a military response. 

Biden was woken by staff at his luxury hotel to be informed of the explosion. 

He postponed attendance at a tree planting ceremony at the G20 summit in Bali on Wednesday morning. He instead met with British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, President Emmanuel Macron of the French Republic and others at the Grand Hyatt hotel. 

He said there was total unanimity among leaders around the table.

Today, the Leaders of Canada, the European Commission, the European Council, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States met on the margins of the G20 Summit in Bali and released the following statement: 

We condemn the barbaric missile attacks that Russia perpetrated on Ukrainian cities and civilian infrastructure on Tuesday. We discussed the explosion that took place in the eastern part of Poland near the border with Ukraine. 

We offer our full support for and assistance with Poland’s ongoing investigation. 

We agree to remain in close touch to determine appropriate next steps as the investigation proceeds. 

We reaffirm our steadfast support for Ukraine and the Ukrainian people in the face of ongoing Russian aggression, as well as our continued readiness to hold Russia accountable for its brazen attacks on Ukrainian communities, even as the G20 meets to deal with the wider impacts of the war. 

We all express our condolences to the families of the victims in Poland and Ukraine.

Biden offered offered full U.S support and assistance with Poland’s investigation in the phone call with Duda (right)

Przewodow is located just five miles from the border with Ukraine

Biden called an emergency meeting of his G7 leaders and N.A.T.O. allies on Wednesday morning at his hotel in Bali, Indonesia.

They were expected to discuss a coordinated response to reports that a Russian missile fell inside Polish territory.

Biden is flanked by Canada’s Justin Trudeau (left) and the U.K.’s Rish Sunak at their Wednesday morning meeting

In attendance were: 

Chancellor Olaf Scholz of the Federal Republic of Germany

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada

President Emmanuel Macron of the French Republic

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of the Italian Republic

Prime Minister Kishida Fumio of Japan

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

President Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission

President Charles Michel of the European Council

Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of the Kingdom of Spain

Prime Minister Mark Rutte of the Netherlands

‘We also discussed the latest series of Russian missile attacks, which are continuing the brutality and inhumanity that they’ve demonstrated throughout this war against Ukrainian cities and civilian infrastructures,’ he said.

‘They’ve been totally unconscionable what they’re doing.’

In a one-on-one meeting with Sunak, he said the U.S. and U.K. were unified in their stance on Ukraine.

‘We’re going to continue to support Ukraine as long as Russia continues their aggression,’ said Biden.

He added that the attacks were barbaric and ‘merciless.’

‘This morning we’ve already met with our fellow N.A.T.O. and G7 leaders to address Russia’s latest missile strikes against Kyiv and Western Ukraine – it’s merciless,’ he said.

Earlier, he telephoned his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda to offer the full backing of the Unites States.

Officials said Biden expressed condolences for the loss of life and laid out Washington’s ‘ironclad’ commitment to N.A.T.O. – which includes a mutual defense pact.

‘President Duda described Poland’s ongoing assessment of the explosion that took place in the eastern part of the country near the border with Ukraine,’ said the White House.

‘President Biden offered full U.S support for and assistance with Poland’s investigation.’

The two leaders will stay in touch.

Biden is due to fly out of Bali on Wednesday after a second day of meetings with other G20 leaders.  

A day earlier Ukrainian President Volodmyr Zelensky dialed in to set out his 10-point plan to ending the war. 

Biden also called N.A.T.O. Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg ahead of an expected meeting of members’ ambassadors later in the day. 

Meanwhile, moments after Biden met with key allies, his predecessor Donald Trump trashed Biden’s diplomacy during a speech from Mar-a-Lago announcing another run for president.

‘The United States has been embarrassed, humiliated and weakened for all to see,’ Trump said, blasting Biden for the hurried withdrawal from Afghanistan.

‘Even just today a missile was sent in probably by Russia to Poland, 15 miles into Poland,’ Trump said, bringing up the explosion and contradicting how Biden phrased the state of play.

‘Enemies are speaking us with scorn and laughter and derision,’ said Trump.

Russia’s war in Ukraine has dominated the gathering of leaders from the world’s 20 richest economy. 

Chinese President Xi Jinping for the first time appeared to express frustration with Moscow, while other leaders lined up to isolate Russia. 

A spokeswoman for Biden’s National Security Council said American officials could not confirm that Russia was responsible for the explosion. But earlier Poland said it believed Russia, and its war in Ukraine was to blame. 

‘A Russian-made missile fell, killing two citizens of the Republic of Poland,’ Polish foreign ministry spokesman Lukasz Jasina said, adding that the Russian ambassador to Poland had been summoned to give ‘immediate detailed explanations’. 

Explosions rang out in Przewodów, a rural village located five miles from the Ukrainian border in south western Poland, at around 3:40pm local time. 

Twin explosions rang out Tuesday afternoon in Przewodów, a rural village located five miles from the Ukrainian border in south western Poland. The aftermath of the explosions, which killed two, is pictured

Smoke rises in the distance, amid reports of two explosions, seen from Nowosiolki, Poland, near the border with Ukraine November 15, 2022

A chunk of metal is pictured lying in the dirt after Russian missiles landed on Polish soil and killed two. Some commentators have claimed the debris looks similar to components of the S-300 air defense system employed in Ukraine, but Poland’s foreign ministry confirmed the missile was Russian

Smoke is seen at the site of a reported Russian missile strike on Polish soil

The blasts came as Moscow launched a wave of missile attacks across Ukraine in what Kyiv said was the heaviest strikes in nearly nine months of war.

Russia’s defense ministry for its part denied that its missiles had landed on Polish soil, describing the incident as ‘a deliberate provocation aimed at escalating the situation’.

It added in a statement: ‘No strikes on targets near the Ukrainian-Polish state border were made by Russian means of destruction.’

One European diplomat said the alliance would act cautiously and needed time to verify how exactly the incident happened.

Poland is a member of N.A.T.O. which maintains a ‘collective defense policy’, meaning that an attack on one nation in the security bloc is an attack on all. 

Article 5 of the Washington treaty – N.A.T.O.’s founding agreement – stipulates that if a N.AT.O. ally is the victim of an armed attack, ‘each and every other member of the alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the ally attacked’.

But Article 4 allows for a consultation of member states to determine appropriate collective responses to incidents, so it is unlikely that N.A.T.O. will launch a military operation unless there is proof of Russian intentions to deliberately target Polish or N.A.T.O. military bases, infrastructure or civilian centers. 

Pentagon spokesman Big. Gen. Patrick Ryder said in a statement that the U.S. is still looking into the reported missile strikes in Poland but added: ‘we’ve been crystal clear that we will defend every inch of NATO territory.’ 

There was speculation that the explosion could have been caused by a Russian missile being shot down over Ukrainian skies before landing in Poland, with some defense researchers claiming parts of the debris bore a resemblance to components of the S-300 air defense system employed in Ukraine, though no conclusive proof was found. 

Meanwhile, editor-in-chief of RT Margarita Simonyan posted an incredulous message on social media, claiming that ‘the probability that a modern Russian missile will go off course so much is about the same as meeting a living dinosaur on the street…. there is a high probability that this is either a Ukrainian mistake or a Polish provocation. Or British.’

Ukraine’s foreign minister called for NATO members to convene an ‘immediate’ summit to bring tough measures against Moscow following the reports Russian missiles had landed in Poland.

‘A collective response to Russian actions must be tough and principled. Among immediate actions: a NATO summit with Ukraine’s participation to craft further joint actions, which will force Russia to change its course on escalation, providing Ukraine with modern aircraft,’ Dmytro Kuleba said in a statement on Twitter.

At least three Russian missiles hit the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv on Tuesday, with mayor Vitali Klitschko saying they all struck residential buildings

Polish president Andrzej Duda is pictured. Polish officials were called into an emergency meeting following the news that a pair of Russian missiles had hit a village near the border with Ukraine, killing two

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting of Pobeda (Victory) organising committee via teleconference call at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence, outside Moscow, on November 15, 2022

Polish government spokesman Piotr Muller said that Warsaw is looking into whether it must request consultations with member states of N.A.T.O. in the wake of the suspected Russian missile strikes. 

Article 4 of the Washington Treaty, which has been recognized since N.A.T.O. was founded in 1949, allows a member state to call on its fellow members to ‘consult together’ when its ‘territorial integrity, political independence or security’ is threatened.

If it can be determined that Russian missiles entered into Poland somehow by mistake or that they were shot down over Ukrainian skies and landed in Poland, then N.A.T.O. is highly unlikely to launch a military response to yesterday’s strike on Poland.

N.A.T.O. members Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland triggered Article 4 in February when Russia first invaded Ukraine, and NATO stationed more troops along the border in those territories. 

But the situation could become significantly more complicated if member states conclude that Moscow intended to hit a location where Western military supplies are stored.

N.A.T.O.’s principle of collective defence, which is fundamental to the alliance, commits all members to take ‘such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force’, in the event of an ‘armed attack’ on any member.

The principle is enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, and dictates that a collective armed response should be implemented if a member state suffers an attack.  

N.A.T.O. has only invoked Article 5 one time in its history, following the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the U.S. 

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke by phone Tuesday with Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda, offering his condolences following reports of the alleged Russian missile strike on Polish soil.

‘Expressed condolences over the death of Polish citizens from Russian missile terror. We exchanged available information and are clarifying all the facts. Ukraine, Poland, all of Europe and the world must be fully protected from terrorist Russia,’ Zelensky said in a tweet.

N.A.T.O. chief Jens Stoltenberg said on Twitter: ‘Spoke with President Duda about the explosion in Poland. I offered my condolences for the loss of life. NATO is monitoring the situation and Allies are closely consulting. Important that all facts are established.’

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meanwhile declared: ‘Alarmed by reports of an explosion in Poland, following a massive Russian missile strike on Ukrainian cities. I extend my condolences and my strongest message of support and solidarity with Poland and our Ukrainian friends,’ adding she was in close contact with Polish security officials. 

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in a tweet said Britain will support allies as they establish what happened.

‘We are also coordinating with our international partners, including NATO,’ he said.

Russia unleashed one of its largest missile barrages to date at Ukraine today, leaving the country’s energy network ‘critical’ with rolling blackouts. 

More than 100 rockets were fired at cities across the country, hitting civilian buildings and power stations, the Ukrainian air force said.

The bombardment left half of Kyiv, where at least one civilian died, and the whole city of Zhytomyr without power.

Strikes were also reported in the western city of Lviv – the closest large urban settlement to the Polish border – and caused partial blackouts. 

Kharkiv, Vinnytsia, Rivne, Odesa, Zaporizhzhia, Chernihiv, Khmelnytskyi, and Ivano-Frankivsk were also targeted.

The bombardment came as German newspaper Der Spiegel reported that documents leaked from the German military said one of the country’s top generals, Eberhard Zorn, ordered the country’s army to put itself on a war footing in the face of ‘existential’ threats.

The 68-page policy paper was produced in September, according to Der Spiegel. In it, Zorn called for the complete overhaul of the German military and told commanders to prepare themselves for war.

‘Attacks on Germany can potentially occur without warning and with great, possibly even existential, damage,’ he wrote.

Firefighters work to put out a fire in a residential building hit by a Russian missile strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv

Russian occupation authorities in Nova Kakhovka in Ukraine’s Kherson region said Tuesday they had left the city, following Moscow’s retreat from the regional capital, because they were under fire from Ukrainian forces.

‘Employees of the state administration of Nova Kakhovka, as well as state and municipal institutions have left the city and were relocated to safe locations in the region,’ the Moscow-installed authorities said on Telegram.

Nova Kakhovka is on the left bank of the Dnipro River, around 60 kilometres north-east of Kherson, from which Russian troops retreated from last week.

The Russian-backed officials said that after Moscow’s pull-out from Kherson, Nova Kakhovka came under ‘indiscriminate fire’ from the Ukrainian army and that ‘life in the city is unsafe.’

It also claimed that ‘thousands of residents’ had followed their recommendation to leave the city to ‘save themselves’, saying Kyiv’s forces will seek ‘revenge on collaborators.’

Attacks on Ukraine today came just hours after Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky – speaking via videolink from Kyiv – told world leaders at the G20 Bali summit that he is ready to end the war provided Russia withdraws its troops from areas it currently occupies. 

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov – speaking later at the summit in Indonesia – accused the West of waging ‘hybrid war’ in Ukraine and Kyiv of ‘prolonging’ the conflict, without mentioning Russia’s own involvement in the fighting.

‘There is an attack on the capital. According to preliminary information, two residential buildings were hit in the Pechersk district,’ Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said.

‘Several missiles were shot down over Kyiv by air defence systems. Medics and rescuers are at the scene of the strikes.’

Moments later, he added: ‘Another hit in the Pechersk district. Multi-storey building.’

Andriy Yermak, head of Zelensky’s staff, said the attack was a response to the president addressing the G20 – ramping up pressure on Russia to stop its attacks.

‘Does anyone seriously think that the Kremlin really wants peace? It wants obedience. But at the end of the day, terrorists always lose,’ Yermak said.

Russian forces have in recent weeks been targeting energy infrastructure across Ukraine and has launched barrages of missiles and swarms of drones.

Around a third of Ukraine’s power-generating capacity has been taken out, causing rolling blackouts across the country just as winter hits.

Kyiv was last targeted by Russian forces nearly one month ago on October 17.

Russia faced mounting diplomatic pressure Tuesday to end its war in Ukraine, as G20 allies and critics alike rued the painful global impact of nearly nine months of conflict.

A draft communique obtained by AFP showed the world’s 20 leading economies coming together to condemn the war’s effects, but still divided on apportioning blame.

The summit has shown that even Russia’s allies have limited patience with a conflict that has inflated food and energy prices worldwide and raised the spectre of nuclear war.

Firefighters work at the scene of a missile attack in Kyiv, Ukraine, which was struck by Russian rockets hours after President Zelensky spoke at the G20

Firefighters work to put out a fire in a residential building hit by a Russian missile strike, amid attacks on Ukraine

President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the G20 just hours before the missiles hit, calling on Russia to end its invasion of his country

Risking diplomatic isolation, Russia was forced to agree that the war in Ukraine – which Moscow refuses to call a war – has ‘adversely impacted the global economy’.

It also agreed that ‘the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons’ is ‘inadmissible’, after months of its president Vladimir Putin making such threats.

The embattled Russian leader has skipped the summit, staying at home to reckon with a string of embarrassing battlefield defeats and a grinding campaign that threatens the future of his regime.

Rubbing salt in Russia’s wounds, Zelensky – fresh from a visit to liberated Kherson – delivered an impassioned video appeal to G20 leaders.

He said they could ‘save thousands of lives’ by pressing for a Russian withdrawal.

The United States and its allies used the summit to broaden the coalition against Russia’s invasion and scotch Moscow’s claims of a conflict of East versus West.

Ukraine has reclaimed more than 50 per cent of the territory it had lost since the beginning of the war to Russian troops, a new report has claimed.

Within a week of Vladimir Putin ordering his tanks to roll across the Ukrainian border on February 24, Russian armed convoys had paraded into north eastern Ukraine and had pulled up mere miles from the outskirts of Kyiv.

There they remained while Russian troops flooded into the south, rumbling through the Zaporizhzhia region and into Kherson where they seized the eponymous city on the Dnieper river.

Putin’s soldiers also launched a grinding offensive in the east, using WWI style tactics of heavy artillery bombardment and trench warfare to grind down Ukrainian positions and advance into the eastern Donbas region. 

But by April, the tide began to turn and Ukrainian forces pushed back the fraying Russian forces outside of Kyiv, forcing them to retreat into Belarus and Putin’s defence chiefs to ‘refocus’ their efforts on the Donbas. 

In the months that have followed, Ukraine’s armed forces engaged in a series of strategic counterattacks which have systematically pushed back Russian forces in the north- and south-east. 

According to an analysis of Institute for the Study of War data by the New York Times, Russia currently controls around 18 per cent of Ukraine, including Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces in the east as well as Crimea, which it illegally annexed in 2014. 

Ukrainian servicemen fire a mortar on a front line, as Russia’s attack on Ukraine continues, near Bakhmut, Donetsk region, Ukraine, pictured 

A Ukrainian servicemen at the frontline at the northern Kherson region on 7 November, pictured

Ukraine have reclaimed areas including Kherson and Kyiv from Russian forces. Pictured: A Ukrainian soldier is kissed by a resident in liberated Kherson on November 13 

Civilians, pictured, carrying Ukrainian flags celebrate at Independence Square after the withdrawal of the Russian army from Kherson to the eastern bank of Dnieper River, Ukraine on November 14, 

Firefighters work to put out a fire in a residential building hit by a Russian missile strike, amid attacks on Ukraine

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Deadly missile attack in Poland may be from Ukraine, US official says

4404592.jpg?r=1668579474265

On Tuesday, Polish officials said a “Russian-made missile” landed in Przewodow, Poland on the Ukraine border. The accusation comes after Russia launched a new wave of missile attacks across Ukraine, but Moscow has denied the allegations.

However, according to US officials, initial findings show the missile that hit Poland may have been fired by Ukrainian forces, the Associated Press has reported.

The official origins of the missile are currently unknown and are still being investigated.

The Guardian’s diplomatic editor Patrick Wintour has reported that the missile may have been an S-300 which are air missile in the possession of Ukraine.

Earlier today, President Joe Biden said the missile that hit Poland “unlikely” came from Russia but added: “I’m going to make sure we figure out exactly what happened.”

Speaking at the G20 conference in Bali, Indonesia the US leader said that “there is preliminary information that contests” the notion that the missile came from Russia.

Picture of Polish police officerA police officer walks past a check point at Przewodow, Poland. (Image: Getty Images)

Picture of Joe BidenJoe Biden has said it is “unlikely” the middle came from Russia (Image: Getty Images)

He said: “I don’t want to say until we completely investigate. It is unlikely in the lines of the trajectory that it was fired from Russia, but we’ll see.”

He did not address where the missile could have been fired from in his statement.

France has urged that there must be “utmost caution” on assessing who is responsible for the missile in Poland.

An official from the French presidency office was quoted by the Agence France-Presse and said: “It’s logical that we approach the question with utmost caution… Many countries have the same kind of weapons, so identifying the type of missile won’t necessarily identify who is behind it.”

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has confirmed he has spoken with Polish President Andrzej Duda and expressed his condolences.

In a statement, he said: “This is a terrible incident and it is necessary to carefully clarify how it came about.”

READ MORE: Two dead after Russian missiles land in NATO state Poland

A map showing the location of the missileTwo people have been killed after a missile landed in Poland (Image: Getty Images)

Picture of Dmytro Kuleba's twitterDmytro Kuleba has said the claim the missile belonged to Ukraine is a Russian “conspiracy theory” (Image: Getty Images)

Polish leader Andrzej Duda has told the media it remained unclear who the missile blast occurred, but said they would be investigating all possibilities.

He said: “We do not have any conclusive evidence at the moment as to who launched this missile … it was most likely a Russian-made missile, but this is all still under investigation at the moment.”

Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said he had no information on the attack, but Russian state news agency Ria Novosti has claimed it was a Ukrainian missile that hit Polish territory.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba has said the claim the missile belonged to Ukraine is a Russian “conspiracy theory” and said anyone repeating the claim was spearing “Russian propaganda”.

DON’T MISS: 
Polish military planes ‘scrambled’ after explosions rock state [REVEAL]
US vows to protect ‘every inch of NATO territory’ after Poland strike [INSIGHT]
Russian missiles strike NATO member Poland – what it means for world [REPORT]

Picture of a sign which says PrzewodowThe missile landed near the Ukraine border in Przewodow, Poland (Image: Getty Images)

US President Joe Biden has met with Rishi Sunak and both condemned the recent missile strikes Russia launched on Ukraine, calling them “barbaric”.

President Biden reportedly told Mr Sunak: “We’re going to continue to support Ukraine as long as Russia continues their aggression.

“I’m glad we’re on the same page in terms of supporting Ukraine.”

The pair have both declined to take any questions from reporters about the missile explosion in Poland.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

СМИ сообщают, что российские ракеты упали в Польше, около границы с Украиной

15 ноября 2022

Обновлено 7 часов назад

Подпишитесь на нашу рассылку ”Контекст”: она поможет вам разобраться в событиях.

Члены правительства и Совета безопасности Польши собрались на срочное совещание

Автор фото, EPA

Подпись к фото,

Члены правительства и Совета безопасности Польши собрались на срочное совещание

Польское правительство провело срочное заседание после сообщений СМИ о том, что на территории Польши, неподалеку от границы с Украиной, во вторник упали две ракеты. Варшава подтвердила, что в результате взрывов погибли два польских гражданина, но пока не делала заявлений о том, что именно стало причиной инцидента и откуда могли прилететь ракеты.

После заседания представитель польского правительства Петр Мюллер заявил, что Польша рассматривает возможность активизации статьи 4 устава НАТО, то есть начать консультации в альянсе по поводу угрозы, которая беспокоит одного из его членов. Мюллер отказался давать какие-либо еще комментарии в связи с инцидентом.

Первой об инциденте с ракетами сообщила польская радиостанция Radio ZET – она сослалась на свои источники и не указала, были ли ракеты российскими. Однако позже агентство Ассошиэйтед пресс написало со ссылкой на неназванных высокопоставленных сотрудников американской разведки, что ракеты залетели на территорию Польши и были российскими.

Министерство обороны США пока не готово подтвердить данные о двух российских ракетах, залетевших на территорию Польши. Представитель американского оборонного ведомства генерал Патрик Райдер заявил на брифинге, что в Пентагоне видели сообщения об инциденте в прессе, но “в данный момент не располагают информацией для подтверждения этих сообщений и продолжают изучать ситуацию”.

Вечером правительство Польши заявило, что приводит войска в состояние повышенной боеготовности.

Министерство обороны России назвало сообщения о падении российских ракет в районе Пшеводува “намеренной провокацией в целях эскалации обстановки”. “Никаких ударов по целям вблизи украинско-польской государственной границы российскими средствами поражения не наносилось, – сказано в заявлении российского военного ведомства. – Опубликованные по горячим следам польскими СМИ с места происшествия в населенном пункте Пшеводув обломки не имеют никакого отношения к российским средствам поражения”.

Президент Украины Владимир Зеленский в своем вечернем заявлении сказал, что в Польше разорвались российские ракеты. “Сегодня российские ракеты ударили по территории Польши, по территории нашей дружественной страны, погибли люди. Примите, пожалуйста, соболезнования от всех украинских братьев. Сколько раз Украина говорила, что нашей страной страна-террорист не ограничится? Польша, страны Балтии – это вопрос времени, когда российский террор пойдет дальше”, – сказал он.

Блок НАТО должен потребовать объяснений

Пол Адамс, дипломатический корреспондент Би-би-си

Правительство Польши пока не подтвердило, что именно произошло на ее границе с Украиной. Однако в соцсетях расходятся фотографии с воронкой и перевернутым трейлером – судя по всему, с зерном. Еще на одном фото, похоже, обломок ракеты.

Есть несколько возможных объяснений. Бить по польским фермам не в интересах России, поэтому ситуация похожа на последствия каких-либо неполадок. Кроме того, сегодня усиленно работала украинская ПВО, сбивая российские ракеты. Нельзя исключить, что одна из ракет ПВО сбилась с курса.

Бывший посол США при НАТО Курт Волкер сказал в беседе с Би-би-си, что считает важным дать России возможность объяснить, что произошло. Он считает, что это могла быть случайность. Однако Россия должна об этом сказать. Блок НАТО, считает Волкер, должен потребовать объяснений.

В соцсетях расходятся фото, предположительно, обломков ракет. Они не верифицированы.

По данным Radio ZET, ракеты упали в деревне Пшеводув в Люблинском воеводстве. Польские пожарные службы говорят о попаданиях на месте, где находится зерносушилка.

Реакция Запада и НАТО

Вечером во вторник пресс-секретарь польского президента Анджея Дуды написал в “Твиттере”, что польский лидер беседует с президентом США Джо Байденом. “Идет разговор двух президентов”, – написал он.

Председатель Европейского совета ЕС Шарль Мишель заявил, что инициирует встречу по инциденту на проходящем на Бали саммите “Большой двадцатки”. Эта встреча должна пройти в среду.

В офисе президента Франции Эммануэля Макрона также заявили, что находятся на связи с польскими властями.

О том же написал генсек НАТО Йенс Столтенберг. “Говорил с президентом Дудой о взрыве в Польше. Я выразил свои соболезнования по поводу гибели людей. НАТО следит за ситуацией, а союзники внимательно консультируются. Важно, чтобы все факты были установлены”, – написал он.

“Мы внимательно следим за ситуацией и поддерживаем связь и нашими польскими друзьями и союзниками по НАТО”, – написала министр иностранных дел Германии Анналена Бербок.

Данные об инциденте также прокомментировали представители нескольких восточноевропейских государств, в том числе министр обороны Латвии Артис Пабрикс. “Мои соболезнования польским братьям по оружию. Преступный российский режим запускает ракеты, которые попадают не только по украинским мирным жителям, но приземлились и на территории НАТО в Польше”, – написал Пабрикс в “Твиттере”.

Похожее заявление сделал латвийский премьер-министр Кришьянис Кариньш, добавив, что “каждый дюйм территории НАТО нужно защищать”.

Россия во вторник ведет массированные обстрелы украинских городов; основная их цель – объекты энергетической инфраструктуры. По данным Офиса президента Украины, около 7 млн домохозяйств в Украине после ракетных ударов по системе энергоснабжения остались без электричества.

Подпись к видео,

Воздушные удары по Украине. Что известно?

В Киеве от обломков сбитых ракет пострадали три жилых дома, сообщается об одном погибшем.

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Biden ‘unlikely’ missile that hit Poland fired from Russia

web1_13168336-8e321a26fde74bcfb344a14be6

  • THE WHITE HOUSE / AP In this photo provided by the White House, President Joe Biden talks on the phone with Polish President Andrzej Duda as White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan, center, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken listen, Wednesday, Nov. 16, in Nusa Dua, Indonesia.

    THE WHITE HOUSE / AP

    In this photo provided by the White House, President Joe Biden talks on the phone with Polish President Andrzej Duda as White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan, center, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken listen, Wednesday, Nov. 16, in Nusa Dua, Indonesia.

NUSA DUA, Indonesia >> President Joe Biden said Wednesday it was “unlikely” that a missile that killed two in NATO-ally Poland was fired from Russia, but he pledged support for Poland’s investigation into what it had called a “Russian-made” missile.

Biden spoke after he convened an “emergency” meeting of the Group of Seven and NATO leaders in Indonesia Wednesday morning for consultations on the attack that killed two people in the eastern part of Poland near the Ukraine border.

“There is preliminary information that contests that,” Biden told reporters when asked if the missile had been fired from Russia. “It is unlikely in the lines of the trajectory that it was fired from Russia, but we’ll see.”

It was not immediately clear whether Biden was suggesting that the missile hadn’t been fired by Russia at all. Ukraine still maintains stocks of former Soviet and Russian-made weaponry, including the S-300 air-defense missile system.

The president, who was awakened overnight by staff with the news of the missile explosion while in Indonesia for the Group of 20 summit, called Polish President Andrzej Duda early Wednesday to express his “deep condolences” for the loss of life. Biden promised on Twitter “full U.S support for and assistance with Poland’s investigation,” and “reaffirmed the United States’ ironclad commitment to NATO.”

Biden said that he briefed the allies on his conversations with Duda and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and that there was “Total unanimity among the folks at the table” to support Poland’s investigation into the attack.

“I’m going to make sure we find out exactly what happened,” Biden said. “And then we’re going to collectively determine our next step as we investigate.”

Meeting at a large round table in a ballroom in his hotel, the U.S. president hosted the leaders of the G-7, which includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the European Union, along with the president of the European Council and the prime ministers of NATO allies Spain and the Netherlands.

A statement from the Polish Foreign Ministry identified the missile as being made in Russia. But Poland’s president, Duda, was more cautious about its origin, saying that officials did not know for sure who fired it or where it was made. He said it was “most probably” Russian-made, but that is being still verified. If confirmed, it would be the first time since the invasion of Ukraine that a Russian weapon came down on a NATO country.

The foundation of the NATO alliance is the principle that an attack against one member is an attack on them all, making the source of the missile launch critical for determining next steps.

Biden also said the leaders condemned “the latest series of Russian missile attacks,” referring to the confirmed Russian strikes in recent days that have targeted Ukraine’s power grid and caused widespread blackouts.

“The moment when the world came together at the G-20 to urge de-escalation, Russia continues to escalate in Ukraine, while we’re meeting,” Biden said. “There were scores and scores of missile attacks in western Ukraine.”

Biden and his allies had set out to isolate Russia at the G-20 summit and the group’s final communique was expected to show that “most” of the nations in the G-20 condemn Russia’s invasion.

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE