Categories
Saved Web Pages

Allegations of political bias, widespread misconduct prompt FBI agents to call for Wray to step down

trump_fbi_64971_c0-341-6907-4370_s1200x7

Rank-and-file FBI agents say they cannot see how FBI Director Christopher A. Wray stays in his position after The Washington Times’ exclusive report about a senior bureau official stepping down under scrutiny for suspected political bias affecting investigations.

Kurt Siuzdak, a lawyer and former FBI agent who represents whistleblowers at the bureau, said agents tell him that Mr. Wray has lost control of the agency and should resign.

“I’m hearing from [FBI personnel] that they feel like the director has lost control of the bureau,” he said. “They’re saying, ‘How does this guy survive? He’s leaving. He’s got to leave.’”

FBI whistleblowers talking to Congress about corruption and retaliation say in disclosures that Mr. Wray was often notified of the problems within the bureau but never took action to resolve them.

That includes recent whistleblower disclosures to House Judiciary Committee Republicans about agents being forced or coerced into signing false affidavits and claims of sexual harassment and stalking. It also includes fabricated terrorism cases to elevate performance statistics, as reported this month by The Times.

“[The FBI agents] are telling me they have lost confidence in Wray. All Wray does is go in and say we need more training and we’re doing stuff about it, or we will not tolerate it,” Mr. Siuzdak said.

SEE ALSO: Top agent exits FBI amid charge of political bias undermining Hunter Biden probe, sources say

In response, the FBI released this statement to The Times:

“The men and women of the FBI work hard every day to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution. All employees are held to the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct, and we expect them to focus on process, rigor, and objectivity in performance of their duties. Allegations of misconduct are taken seriously and referred to the Inspection Division or appropriate investigative body. In reality, the FBI is comprised of 37,000 employees who do it the right way on a daily basis to keep our nation safe by fighting violent crime, preventing terrorist attacks and defending America from espionage and cyber threats.”

The increased scrutiny on the conduct of FBI agents, including accusations of politicized investigations, led to the exit of a top official last week, as first reported by The Times on Monday.

Timothy Thibault, an assistant special agent in charge at the FBI’s Washington field office, was forced to leave his post last week, according to information from two former FBI officials familiar with the situation.

At a recent Senate hearing, Republicans questioned Mr. Wray about Mr. Thibault, who made anti-Trump statements in social media posts in 2020. At the time, Mr. Thibault led the FBI’s investigation of Hunter Biden, whose father was running for the White House.

In February and September of 2020, Mr. Thibault liked separate Washington Post opinion pieces criticizing Attorney General William Barr for not being more aggressive in prosecuting President Trump’s political allies and close associates.

Mr. Thibault also retweeted a post by the Lincoln Project, a Republican group that called Mr. Trump “a psychologically broken, embittered and deeply unhappy man.”

Mr. Wray was evasive about Mr. Thibault and his social media posts. He called them “ongoing personnel matters.”

Rank-and-file agents are now privately urging Mr. Wray to step down.

Republican lawmakers have previously called for the resignation of Mr. Wray, whom Mr. Trump appointed in 2017.

The first call for his resignation was in 2018. Florida Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican who is now a U.S. senator, criticized the FBI for failing to properly investigate a tip about the Parkland shooter. In 2020, then-Rep. Doug Collins, Georgia Republican, called for Mr. Wray’s resignation for the way he handled the Trump-Russia investigation.

“For Wray, not tolerating it means he doesn’t do anything. And that’s what I think people are people reacting to because at this point you need to have leadership’s stepping-up and taking charge, and there is a complete leadership vacuum.”

The increased scrutiny of the FBI includes accusations that bureau officials routinely violate federal whistleblower protections for employees. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the committee’s top Republican, recently introduced legislation to improve those protections.

The legislation would allow FBI whistleblowers to appeal retaliation cases to the Merit Systems Protection Board, a quasi-judicial agency that oversees most other federal whistleblower cases.  

The act also would allow FBI whistleblower retaliation cases to proceed to the board if the FBI has not issued a ruling within 180 days, the length of time the FBI attempts to complete an investigation and adjudication of a misconduct case. FBI whistleblowers are not given the same anti-retaliation protections as most other federal employees.

• Kerry Picket can be reached at kpicket@washingtontimes.com.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Frustrations Mount at Washington Post as Its Business Struggles

00wapo-1-facebookJumbo.jpg

With digital subscriptions and digital advertising revenue stagnating, the company is on a pace to lose money this year.

  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

This article is part of our Daily Business Briefing

Fred Ryan, the chief executive and publisher of The Washington Post, with Sally Buzbee, the executive editor, left.

Fred Ryan, the chief executive and publisher of The Washington Post, with Sally Buzbee, the executive editor, left.Credit…Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

In the years after Jeff Bezos bought The Washington Post in 2013, business boomed. Droves of readers bought digital subscriptions, and the newsroom roughly doubled in size, adding hundreds more journalists.

But The Post’s business has stalled in the past year. As the breakneck news pace of the Trump administration faded away, readers have turned elsewhere, and the paper’s push to expand beyond Beltway coverage hasn’t compensated for the loss.

The organization is on track to lose money in 2022, after years of profitability, according to two people with knowledge of the company’s finances. The Post now has fewer than the three million paying digital subscribers it had hailed internally near the end of 2020, according to several people at the organization. Digital ad revenue generated by The Post fell to roughly $70 million during the first half of the year, about 15 percent lower than in the first half of 2021, according to an internal financial document reviewed by The New York Times.

Fred Ryan, the chief executive and publisher, in recent weeks has floated with newsroom leaders the possibility of cutting 100 positions, according to several people with knowledge of the discussions. The cuts, if they happen, could come through hiring freezes for open jobs or other ways. The newsroom now has about 1,000 people.

A spokeswoman for The Post said the organization was not reducing head count, and instead would be adding steadily to the newsroom and “exploring positions that should be repurposed to serve a larger, national and global audience.” She said the document showing ad revenue declines depicted an incomplete picture of The Post’s business, but she declined to detail how.

More than 20 people with knowledge of The Post’s business operations spoke for this article. Most of them would do so only on the condition of anonymity, to protect their relationships inside the organization.

The Post’s newsroom remains one of the most formidable in the country. This year, it won the coveted Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for reporting on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. The publication has also, in recent years, opened hubs in Seoul and London to enable round-the-clock editing, and it has invested in coverage of topics such as personal technology, climate, and health and wellness.

Many news outlets, in addition to The Post, have experienced declining readership since former President Donald J. Trump left office. But two of The Post’s top competitors — The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal — have added subscriptions since Mr. Trump left office.

The downturn at The Post has set off frustration internally. Some top executives are concerned that Mr. Ryan, picked by Mr. Bezos to be the publication’s top business executive, hasn’t moved decisively enough to expand coverage. Some have also become irritated by the company’s halting marketing efforts, which are guided by Mr. Ryan, and inconclusive talks about acquiring another large news organization.

Mr. Ryan’s focus on productivity and office attendance in the newsroom has also been a source of tension. He has expressed his belief to members of his leadership team that there were numerous low performers in the newsroom who needed to be managed out. He has monitored how many staff members come into the office, and has weighed new measures to compel people to return to work, including threats of firings, several people at The Post said.

Many of the publication’s top leaders, including its top editor, Sally Buzbee, are urging patience. They say the company’s efforts to broaden coverage will eventually attract new readers and lead to financial success.

Ms. Buzbee said the newsroom was in the process of adding 150 positions. Mr. Ryan; Joy Robins, The Post’s chief revenue officer; and Ms. Buzbee, who joined in 2021, are overseeing a new initiative called “5 by 25,” an effort to reach five million total digital subscribers by 2025.

“There’s no question that we need to diversify what people come to us for,” Ms. Buzbee said in an interview. “That’s our whole strategy.”

Mr. Ryan declined to comment for this article. The spokeswoman for The Post noted that Mr. Ryan had championed investment, citing the creation of international news hubs, an initiative aimed at younger readers and a partnership with Imagine Entertainment, the Hollywood studio.

“These investments are aligned with our strategic road map, and we expect to see returns, both in consumer and advertising revenue, on this work in the coming year,” the spokeswoman said.

Jeff Bezos, center, bought The Washington Post in 2013. He picked Mr. Ryan, right, to be the publication’s top business executive.Credit…Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Mr. Bezos, one of the world’s richest people, has said an independent newsroom should be self-sustaining. He was a regular presence at The Post for the first few years after he purchased the company, but receded somewhat from the newspaper’s operations during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a person with knowledge of his interactions. Zoom and phone meetings with Mr. Bezos, once held every other week, have become less frequent, as have trips by Post executives to Seattle, where Mr. Bezos lives, to solicit his input.

Mr. Bezos is still engaged, however, weighing in during budgeting season and participating in calls. He declined to comment for this article, but the Post spokeswoman said any suggestion that Mr. Bezos had become less interested in The Post was “absolutely false.”

What we consider before using anonymous sources.
How do the sources know the information? What’s their motivation for telling us? Have they proved reliable in the past? Can we corroborate the information? Even with these questions satisfied, The Times uses anonymous sources as a last resort. The reporter and at least one editor know the identity of the source.

Much of the decision-making, though, falls on Mr. Ryan, 67. A former official in the Reagan administration and chief executive of Politico, he came to The Post in 2014. He replaced Katharine Weymouth, a scion of the Graham family, which was The Post’s longtime owner. When Mr. Bezos selected him in 2014, he thanked him for taking the job, adding that Mr. Ryan was “excited to roll up his sleeves.”

The Post’s efforts to diversify its journalism beyond political coverage extends back until at least the summer of 2016. At that time, senior editors considered a plan that would expand the newspaper’s coverage to temper a decline in readership during what they thought would be the presidential administration of Hillary Clinton, according to two people with knowledge of the proposal.

The plan, code-named Operation Skyfall, was set aside after Mr. Trump won the presidential election.

As the importance of moving beyond Washington coverage became more urgent over the past year, Mr. Ryan has given some mixed signals about how ambitiously he wanted to move.

Late last year, as part of a monthslong review of the company done by an internal group called the Strategic Review Team, Mr. Ryan told executives that The Post could be the definitive source of news and information for the English-speaking world, according to people with knowledge of the meeting. At a subsequent gathering of the executives, he said The Post should be an essential source of news, which at least one person interpreted as a less ambitious goal. Others in attendance, including Ms. Buzbee, said they did not see his comments that way.

The Post’s executives have had extensive internal talks about whether to buy other major news organizations, according to five people familiar with the matter. The outlets discussed have included The Associated Press, The Economist and The Guardian, some of the people said. The Strategic Review Team noted in a multipage memo that an acquisition might make sense to expand The Post’s audience internationally, where it is not as well known.

So far, Mr. Ryan has focused on building The Post’s capacity for covering new areas rather than acquiring rivals.

Mr. Ryan’s decision to scrap some of the newspaper’s brand marketing campaigns has been another source of tension among executives at The Post, according to two people with knowledge of the paper’s branding strategy. The newspaper hired the firms Ogilvy and Buddha Jones to create advertising for The Post, but some of those campaigns were never widely distributed.

Mr. Ryan’s focus on productivity and office attendance in the newsroom has been a source of tension.Credit…Justin T. Gellerson for The New York Times

A rendering of one of those campaigns, which was never used, showed a sleek subway ad featuring the slogan: “We don’t just break news. We break ground.” The Post also filmed two reporters, Sarah Kaplan and Darryl Fears, for an ad about the newspaper’s efforts to cover the changing climate, but that spot hasn’t run.

One person familiar with The Post’s marketing strategy said the company was planning a major brand marketing push to promote its new coverage areas, including climate. Last year, The Post aired a campaign on “Jeopardy!” around the Afghanistan Papers, its investigation into the secret history of the war in Afghanistan.

The discussions about budget reductions come as Mr. Ryan has expressed annoyance with senior newsroom leaders at what he sees as a lack of productivity by some journalists at the paper. Last fall, he asked for the company’s chief information officer to pull records on which days employees held videoconference meetings, as a way to judge production levels, and found that fewer meetings occurred on Fridays, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

He has also grown increasingly frustrated that some Post staff members are still not in the office at least three days a week, the company’s policy.

In recent weeks, Mr. Ryan asked for disciplinary letters to be drafted and sent to employees who had not made any appearance in the office this year, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions. He ultimately decided that the letters should not be sent, and that the people should be called instead. The Post spokeswoman said Mr. Ryan welcomed employee input on the return-to-office policy.

Some employees have taken their frustrations directly to Mr. Ryan. A letter addressed to Post management and sent to Mr. Ryan this month from journalists who covered the Covid-19 pandemic cited “grave concerns” about the policy.

“Such decisions are extremely personal and consequential,” the letter said, “and we urge management to allow employees to make these decisions without fear of punishment from their employer.”

Categories
Saved Web Pages

Обыски в Германии: сырье для “Новичка” поставляли из ФРГ? – DW – 30.08.2022

16336220_6.jpg

Власти Германии подозревают немецкие компании Riol Chemie и R.R. Rhein Reserve в том, что они могли на протяжении последних трех с половиной лет без соответствующего разрешения поставлять в Россию ядовитые субстанции и товары специального назначения для лабораторий. Ранним утром во вторник, 30 августа, в помещениях этих фирм – в поселке Лилиенталь в федеральной земле Нижняя Саксония и городе Констанце в земле Баден-Вюртемберг – прошли масштабные обыски в рамках расследования, которое ведет прокуратура города Штаде.

Следователи полагают, что среди ядовитых субстанций могли быть и химикалии, служащие основой для производства химического и биологического оружия – такого, как горчичный газ (иприт) и “Новичок”, сообщают немецкие общественно-правовые медиакомпании NDR и WDR, а также газета Süddeutsche Zeitung. Судя по документам, оказавшимся в распоряжении журналистов, эти субстанции могли экспортировать в мизерных объемах, в частности, на предприятие “Химмед” в Москве.

На сайте российской компании указывается, что она является “официальным дистрибьютором крупнейших мировых производителей реактивов и оборудования для лабораторий” и “активно сотрудничает со многими российскими и зарубежными партнерами в области поставок химических реактивов, фармацевтических субстанций, оборудования, расходных материалов”. При этом название компании Riol Chemie GmbH в обнародованной на сайте выборке основных партнеров “Химмеда” не значится.

Компании из санкционного списка США

Между тем еще в марте 2022 года “Новая газета” опубликовала расследование, согласно которому “Химмед” является поставщиком материалов для спецлабораторий Минобороны РФ и ФСБ. Издание отмечает, что эта компания входит в список из 13 российских, швейцарских и немецких фирм, санкционированных США за “участие в поддержке российских программ по разработке оружия массового уничтожения”.

Как указано на сайте немецкой новостной программы Tagesschau, Rio Chemie также находится в этом списке. При этом ЕС поддерживать санкционный список США не стал.

Одна из жертв отравлений28G:><“>AA89A:89 >??>78F8>==K9 ?>;8B8: ;5:A59 020;L=K9″ style=”padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; max-height: 0;”>Одна из жертв отравлений “Новичком” – Алексей НавальныйФото: Daria Nawalny/privat/Instagram/dpa/picture alliance“>

Ряд химикалий, которые Riol Chemie могла поставлять российскому закупщику, – так называемые товары двойного назначения, то есть те, которые могут использоваться как для мирных, так и для военных целей. Кроме того, речь идет о поставках защитного оборудования, применяющегося при производстве био- и химического оружия. Экспорт такого оборудования из Германии подлежит строгому регулированию.

Как Россия пытается обойти санкции

По данным германских служб безопасности, на протяжении последних лет Россия активно предпринимала усилия по скрытой закупке на мировом рынке материалов и веществ, которые могут быть использованы в военных целях, однако являются для Москвы труднодоступными из-за западных санкций.

Так, в середине июля высший земельный суд Дрездена приговорил гражданина Германии – предпринимателя из округа Лейпциг – к трем годам и трем месяцам лишения свободы, посчитав доказанным, что в период с 2017 по 2020 годы тот в семи случаях экспортировал в Россию без лицензии лабораторное оборудование на сумму около миллиона евро. Согласно обвинительному заключению, мужчина делал это через подставную компанию, которой руководила российская спецслужба.

Намеренное введение таможни в заблуждение

Компания Riol Chemie оказала в фокусе внимания германской таможни в 2021 году во время одной из проверок. В прошлом против этой фирмы уже велось расследование в связи с подозрением в нарушении закона о регулировании внешнеэкономической деятельности.

После того как Riol Chemie попала в американский санкционный список, ряд ее бывших сотрудников зарегистрировали в городе Констанце еще одну компанию – R.R. Rhein Reserve. В настоящий момент прокуратура города Штаде проверяет, не использовалась ли эта фирма для осуществления незаконного экспорта в Россию.

По данным следствия, компания Riol Chemie, сотрудничая с фирмой по перевозкам из Бремена, намеренно вводила таможню в заблуждение, утверждая, что осуществляет вывоз лабораторного оборудования, экспорт которого подвержен ограничениям, вовсе не в Россию, а в Литву. Об этом говорит содержание телефонных разговоров сотрудников немецкой фирмы, прослушанных следователями.

Судя по всему, и руководители компаний Riol Chemie и R.R. Rhein Reserve  имели связи с Россией. Из российского торгового регистра следует, в частности, что бывший управляющий компании Riol Chemie ранее был совладельцем дочернего предприятия “Химмеда”. Ту же роль в свое время играл и нынешний директор этого немецкого предприятия. По мнению Федерального ведомства по охране конституции, управление немецкими компаниями по сути осуществлялось из России.

На данный момент компании Riol Chemie, R.R. Rhein Reserve и “Химмед” не прокомментировали выдвинутые против них обвинения.

Смотрите также:

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE